Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:40:54.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel's Defence of Plotinus against F. H. Jacobi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Stylianos Tavoularis
Stylianos Tavoularis*
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Abstract

Although Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy was teaching material intended for students and published posthumously, it would be wrong to regard this work as irrelevant to his philosophical project. In his introduction to the Lectures, Hegel emphasised that the history of philosophy should not be treated as a mere accumulation of opinions, or as a random collection of correct and incorrect views according to some later standards. The history of philosophy, just like art, religion and Recht, reflects the necessary logical determinations of the Idea, and in this sense it should be studied with the intent of revealing those determinations. Hegel, of course, intended his project to be sufficiently established through the Phenomenology and the Logic without the need to resort to any historical manifestations of culture. However, his interpretation of the history of philosophy does reveal his own philosophical agenda more straightforwardly than the ahistorical complex accounts of his other major works.

Hegel's intention was to present the development of the history of philosophy as a reflection of the development of the Idea. Therefore, one would assume that the further we go back in time, we would find philosophers whose doctrines were less mature and more distant from Hegel's own conception of philosophy. However, Hegel seems to have singled out a few favourite philosophers, to whom he did not hesitate to attribute insights that could not possibly have been developed at the time, according to his pre-conceived pattern of development. One famous example was Aristotle, whom he credited with the conception of a Reason that becomes its own object, i.e., Reason which is ‘in and for-itself.’ A philosopher belonging to the ‘objective’ stage of the spirit could not normally have achieved such a conception.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 28 , Issue 1-2: number 55/56 , 2007 , pp. 121 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anselm, (2001), Proslogion, trans. Williams, T.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1982), Metaphysics, trans. Tredennick, H.. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1993), On the Free Choice of the Will, trans. Williams, Thomas. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. (2004), Platonismus und Idealismus. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Bonaventure, (2002), ‘Christ Our One Teacher’, trans. Pasnau, R., Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts: Volume 3, Mind and Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 79–92.Google Scholar
Bussanich, J. (1997), The One and its Relation to Intellect in Plotinus. Brill: Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (1994), God and Greek Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1994), Traite 9 (VI, 9), Les écrits de Plotin publiés dans l'ordre chronologique. Paris: Editions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, J. (1999), Hegel und der spätantike Neuplatonismus. Untersuchungen zur Metaphysik des Einen und des Nous in Hegels spekulativer und geschichtlicher Deutung, Beihefte, Bd. 40. Bonn: Hegel-Studien.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Faith and Knowledge, trans. Cerf, W. and Harris, H. S.. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1985), Hegel's Introduction to the Lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. Knox, T. M. and Miller, A. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1989), Faith and Knowledge, trans. Miller, A. V.. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), Encyclopaedia Logic, trans. Geraets, T. F., Suchting, W. A. and Harris, H. S.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1999), An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Beauchamp, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jong, K. H. E. (1916), Hegel und Plotin. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klibansky, R. (1982), The Continuity of the Platonic Tradition during the Middle Ages. New York: Kraus Intl Pubns.Google Scholar
Meijer, P. A. (1992), Plotinus on the Good or the One (Enneads VI, 9). Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Meara, D. ed. (1981), Neoplatonism and Christian Thought. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1973), ‘The One of Plotinus and the God of Aristotle,’ Review of Metaphysics 27: 75–87.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1996), ‘Plotinus and Christian Philosophy’ in Gerson, Lloyd P. ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 386–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiedemann, D. (1797), Geist der Speculativen Philosophie. Marburg: Neue Akademische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Tennemann, W. G. (1819), Geschichte der Philosophie. Leipsig: Barth.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (1989), ‘Hegel's Attitude toward Jacobi in the “Third Attitude of Thought toward Objectivity’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 27: 135–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gandillac, M. (1974), ‘Hegel et le Néoplatonisme’ in Hondt, J. D' ed., Hegel et la Pensée Grecque. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Düsing, K. (1983), Hegel und die Geschichte der Philosophie: Ontologie und Dialektik in Antike und Neuzeit. Darmstadt.Google Scholar