Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:32:37.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Michael Baur and John Russon (eds), Hegel and the Tradition: Essays in Honour of H.S. Harris (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997), pp. xv + 349. ISBN 0-8020-0927-1.

Review products

Michael Baur and John Russon (eds), Hegel and the Tradition: Essays in Honour of H.S. Harris (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997), pp. xv + 349. ISBN 0-8020-0927-1.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Will Dudley
Will Dudley*
Affiliation:
Williams College
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 22 , Issue 1-2: number 43/44 , January 2001 , pp. 72 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The essay, co-translated by H.S. Harris and Walter Cerf, thus might have been rendered more perspicuously, without the misleading initial definite article, as “Differentiation within Fichte's and Schelling's System of Philosophy.” Hoffmann remarks in a note that “it was the publisher who inserted the definite article. Since Hegel had not used a definite article, Harris had intended to render the title without it, but at the publisher's insistence he relented, since he felt at the time that he did not have a strong argument for leaving it out” (260-1, note 9).

2 This is also the advance that John McCumber's essay, to be discussed below, attributes to Hegel over Hamann.

3 James Crooks' essay, discussed above, also clearly expresses the view that Hegelian truth resides entirely in the speculative process, to which particular theoretical results are subordinate.