Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:52:20.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problem of Nature in Hegel's Philosophy of Right

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2021

Simon Lumsden
Simon Lumsden*
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australias.lumsden@unsw.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

The notion of being-at-home-in-otherness is the distinctive way of thinking of freedom that Hegel develops in his social and political thought. When I am at one with myself in social and political structures (institutions, rights and the state) they are not external powers to which I am subjected but are rather constitutive of my self-relation, that is my self-conception is mediated and expanded through those objective structures. How successfully Hegel may achieve being-at-home-in-otherness with regard to these objective structures of right in the Philosophy of Right is arguable. What is at issue in this paper is however to argue that there is a blind spot in the text with regard to nature. In Ethical Life the rational subject's passions and inclinations are brought into the subject such that she is ‘with herself’ in them; with regard to external nature no such reconciliation is achieved or even attempted. In Abstract Right external nature is effectively dominated by and subsumed into the will and it is never something in which one is with oneself. It remains outside the model of freedom that Hegel develops in the Philosophy of Right. There is something troubling about this formulation, since it excludes nature from freedom, but also something accurate, as it reflects the unresolved attitude of moderns to the natural world.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 42 , Special Issue 1: Naturalism and Sociality , April 2021 , pp. 96 - 113
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, J. (2017), ‘Our Amphibian Problem: Nature in History in Adorno's Hegelian Critique of Hegel’, in Kreines, J. and Zuckert, R. (eds.), Hegel on Philosophy in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blasche, S. (2004), ‘Natural Ethical Life and Civil Society: Hegel's construction of the family’, in Pippin, R. and Quante, M. (eds.), Hegel on Ethics and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2019), A Spirit of Trust: A Reading Hegel's ‘Phenomenology’. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deranty, J-P. (2021), ‘The Body of Spirit: Hegel's Concept of Flesh and its Normative Implications’, Hegel Bulletin. 42:1. doi: 10.1017/hgl.2020.27.Google Scholar
Hailwood, S. (2015), Alienation and Nature in Environmental Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970a), Philosophy of Nature, ed. and trans. Petry, M. J.. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970b), The Encyclopaedia Logic: Part One of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, trans. Garaets, T. F., Suchting, W. A. and Harris, H. S.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hutchings, K. (2017), ‘Living the contradictions: wives, husbands, and children in Hegel's Elements of the Philosophy of Right’, in James, D. (ed.), Hegel's Elements of the ‘Philosophy of Right’: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1970), Political Writings, trans. Nisbet, H. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lumsden, S. (2012), ‘Habit, Sittlichkeit and Second Nature’, Critical Horizons 13:2: 220–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, S. (2018), ‘Hegel and Pathologized Modernity or the End of Spirit in the Anthropocene’, History and Theory 57:3: 371–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magri, E. (2018), ‘Zweite Natur und Sittlichkeit: Über Hegels Auffassung von Inhabitanz’, in Oehl, T. and Kok, A. (eds.), Objektiver und Absoluter Geist nach Hegel: Kunst, Religion und Philosophie innerhalb und außerhalb von Gesellschaft und Geschichte. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Menke, C. (2017), ‘Autonomy and Liberation: The Historicity of Freedom’, in Kreines, J. and Zuckert, R. (eds.), Hegel on Philosophy in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merker, B. (2012), ‘Embodied Normativity: Revitalizing Hegel's Account of the Human Organism’, Critical Horizons 13:2: 154–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, K. (2017), ‘Hegel and Adorno on Negative Universal History: The Dialectics of Species-Life’, in Monahan, M. (ed.), Creolizing Hegel. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Novakovic, A. (2019), ‘Hegel's Real Habits’, European Journal of Philosophy 27:4: 882–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2012), Hegel's Naturalism: Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. (2008), Hegel's Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, S. (2017), ‘Hegel's Philosophy of Nature’, in Moyar, D. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ritter, J. (2004), ‘Person and Property in Hegel's Philosophy of Right’, in Pippin, R. and Quante, M. (eds.), Hegel on Ethics and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2016), ‘Hegel, Nature and Ethics’, in Keogh, G. (ed.), The Ethics of Nature and the Nature of Ethics. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Testa, I. (2009), ‘Second Nature and Recognition: Hegel and the Social Space’, Critical Horizons 10:3: 341–70. https://doi.org/10.1558/crit.v10i3.341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testa, I. (2020), ‘Embodied Cognition, Habit, and Natural Agency in Hegel's Anthropology’, in Bykova, M. and Westphal, K. (eds.), The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. (2015), Thinking Like a Mall: Environmental Philosophy After the End of Nature. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar