Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T18:53:25.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current Status of Geophysical Models of Nutation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

P.M. Mathews  and
V. Dehant
P.M. Mathews
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge, Massachusetts
V. Dehant
Affiliation:
Royal Observatory of Belgium Brussels, Belgium

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Geophysical modeling of nutations involves (a) the formulation of a general theory of the forced nutations of an idealized Earth (spheroidal, oceanless, elastic), supplemented by separate theoretical treatments of the effects of the oceans, anelasticity, and other deviations from the ideal, and (b) fitting of the theoretical expressions to VLBI-estimated amplitudes of the various spectral components of the nutations. The aim is to obtain best-fit estimates of Earth parameters which influence the nutations; and the degree of success of the modeling is judged by the precision of the estimates obtained, as well as the quality of the fit as measured by χ2red, the chisquared per degree of freedom.

We present here our findings from two types of fits using, for the observational input, the nutation amplitude estimates for seven important pairs (retrograde and prograde) of circular nutations, together with their standard errors and mutual correlations, which were kindly furnished by T.A. Herring (private communication, 1993). The theoretical framework employed was that of Mathews et al. (1991), hereinafter referred to as MBHS, together with the Zhu and Groten (1989) rigid Earth nutation series modified to take account of the recently-estimated correction of −0.3 mas/cy to the precession constant. Estimates of ocean tide effects, and of anelasticity effects based on Wahr and Bergen’s (1986) results for model QMU with α = 0.15 (hereafter abbreviated to WB), were taken from Herring et al. (1991). Alternative estimates of anelasticity effects (DZ, due to Dehant (1990) based on the Zschau model), were also considered.

Type
II. Joint Discussions
Information
Highlights of Astronomy , Volume 10: Highlights of Astronomy. As presented at the XXIInd General Assembly of the IAU, 1994 , 1995 , pp. 243 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1995

References

Defraigne, P., Dehant, V., and Hinderer, J. (1994), J. Geophys. R., Vol. 99, pp. 9203–9213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehant, V. (1990), Geophys. J. Int., Vol. 100, pp. 477–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwinn, C.R., Herring, T.A., and Shapiro, I.I. (1986), J. Geophys. R., Vol. 91, pp. 4745–4754.Google Scholar
Mathews, P.M., Buffett, B.A., Herring, T.A., and Shapiro, I.I. (1991), J. Geophys. R., Vol. 96, pp. 8219–8257.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1910), Bull. Astron., Vol. 27, pp. 321–356.Google Scholar
Wahr, J.M., and Bergen, Z. (1986), Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., Vol. 87, pp. 633–668.Google Scholar
Zhu, S.Y., and Groten, E. (1989), Astron. J., Vol. 99, pp. 1024–1044.Google Scholar