Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:12:33.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DUBLIN'S NORTH INNER CITY, PRESERVATIONISM, AND IRISH MODERNITY IN THE 1960S*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2010

ERIKA HANNA*
Affiliation:
Hertford College, University of Oxford
*
Hertford College Oxford OX1 3BWerika.hanna@history.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

This article examines changes to Dublin's built environment in the 1960s through a study of the north inner city. It first discusses Dublin Corporation policy in the area and then studies three efforts to resist these changes, by the Irish Georgian Society, Uinseann MacEoin, and the Dublin Housing Action Committee. It argues that, due to the deficit of urban regulation emanating from central government, these groups could use preservation as a way to articulate a variety of discontents. The three campaigns all had very different conceptions of what was worth preserving in the urban environment, resisted Corporation policy in very different ways, and ultimately came into conflict. This urban activism raised issues about the nature of the city in the Irish cultural imagination, the effects of urban modernization, and the role of voluntary bodies in shaping the urban environment. Through addressing these themes this article makes a fundamental contribution to the historiography of the 1960s in Ireland by assessing the complexities of Irish modernity and the continued impact of a multiplicity of pasts on Irish politics and culture.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Many thanks to my interviewees who made the research for this article possible: Harold Clarke, the Honourable Desmond Guinness, Ruadhan MacEoin, John McDonnell, Jennifer McRea, and Ian MacLaughlin. I would also like to thank the Modern British History seminar at the University of Oxford for their helpful questions and comments on this article. In particular, it benefited greatly from reading and advice from Roy Foster, Matt Houlbrook, and Josie McLellan.

References

1 F. O'Connor, Irish miles (Dublin, 1947), pp. 12–13.

2 P. Hall, Cities of tomorrow: an intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century (Oxford, 2004); Mort, F., ‘Fantasies of metropolitan life: planning London in the 1940s’, Journal of British Studies, 43, (2004), pp. 120–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; S. Gunn and R. Morris, eds., Identities in space: contested terrain in the western city since 1850 (Aldershot, 2001).

3 R. Foster, Luck and the Irish: a brief history of change, c. 1970–2000 (London, 2007); F. Tobin, The best of decades: Ireland in the nineteen-sixties (Dublin, 1984); B. Fallon, An age of innocence: Irish culture, 1930–1960 (Dublin, 1998); D. Keogh, F. O'Shea, and C. Quinlan, eds., The lost decade: Ireland in the 1950s (Cork, 2004); B. Fanning, The quest for modern Ireland: the battle for ideas, 1912–1986 (Dublin, 2008).

4 R. Foster, Modern Ireland, 1600–1972 (London, 1988), ch. 23; P. Bew, Ireland: the politics of enmity, 1789–2006 (Oxford, 2007), p. 477; H. Patterson, Ireland since 1939: the persistence of conflict (London, 2006), p. 146; B. Girvin and G. Murphy ‘Whose Ireland? the Lemass era’, in B. Girvin and G. Murphy, eds., The Lemass era: politics and society in the Ireland of Sean Lemass (Dublin, 2005), p. 2; T. Garvin, Preventing the future: why was Ireland so poor for so long? (Dublin, 2004), p. 200; J. Horgan, Sean Lemass: the enigmatic patriot (Dublin, 1997), p. 189; P. Bew and H. Patterson, Sean Lemass and the making of modern Ireland, 1945–1966 (Dublin, 1982), pp. 1–15.

5 J. Lee, Ireland, 1912–1985: politics and society (Cambridge, 1989), p. 386.

6 Ibid., p. 652; T. Brown, Ireland: a social and cultural history, 1922–2002 (London, 2004), p. 255.

7 Garvin, T., ‘The destiny of soldiers: tradition and modernity in the politics of De Valera's Ireland’, Political Studies, 26, (1978), pp. 328–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; R. Savage, ‘Introducing television in the age of Sean Lemass’, in Girvin and Murphy, eds., The Lemass era, pp. 191–214; M. Daly and M. O'Callaghan, ‘Introduction – Irish modernity and “the patriotic dead” in 1966’, in M. Daly and M. O'Callaghan, eds., 1916 in 1966: commemorating the Easter Rising (Dublin, 2007), pp. 1–17; C. Holohan, ‘More than a revival of memories? 1960s youth and the 1916 Rising’, in Daly and O'Callaghan, eds., 1916 in 1966, pp. 173–97; J. Cleary, ‘Introduction: Ireland and modernity’, in J. Cleary and C. Connolly, eds., The Cambridge companion to modern Irish culture (Cambridge, 2005), pp. 1–21; C. McCarthy, Modernisation, crisis and culture in Ireland, 1969–1992 (Dublin, 2000).

8 Lee, Ireland, p. 652; Brown, Ireland, p. 255.

9 P. O'Mahony and G. Delanty, Rethinking Irish history: nationalism, identity and ideology (London, 1998), p. 167.

10 A. Kincaid, Postcolonial Dublin: imperial legacies and the built environment (London, 2006), p. 140.

11 H. Campbell, ‘Modern architecture and national identity in Ireland’, in Cleary and Connolly, eds., Cambridge companion to modern Irish culture, p. 297.

12 J. Prunty, Dublin slums 1800–1925: a study in urban geography (Dublin, 1999), pp. 274–98.

13 M. Craig, Dublin 1660–1880 (Dublin, 1980), pp. 187–90; N. McCullough, Dublin: an urban history (Dublin, 1989), pp. 62–5; M. Daly, Dublin: the deposed capital: a social and economic history, 1860–1914 (Cork, 1984), ch. 1.

14 ‘The ruined city’, Build, Dec. 1965, p. 10.

15 P. Abercrombie, S. Kelly, and M. Robertson, Town Planning Report: Sketch Development Plan (Dublin, 1941); map in National Archives of Ireland (NAI) S6619D.

16 K. Schaecterle, General traffic plan part 1: traffic investigation concerning the future main road network, carried out in accordance with the corporation of Dublin (Ulm and Donau, 1965).

17 R. Travers Morgan & Partners, Central Dublin traffic plan (Dublin, 1973).

18 ‘Two killed as home collapses’, Irish Press, 3 June 1963, p. 5 col. 1; ‘Eight families evacuated’, Irish Press, 5 June 1963, p. 7, col. 2; ‘Tenements evacuated’, Irish Press 6 June 1963, p. 5, col. 2; ‘Two girls die as houses fall’, Irish Press, 13 June 1963, p. 1, col. 1; Local inquiry at City Hall Dublin, 24 June 1963 to 5 July 1963 p. 3, NAI S17486/63.

19 Letter from Sean Moore to Sean Lemass, 20 Aug. 1963, NAI S17486/63.

20 ‘Fifty houses in danger’, Irish Press, 14 June 1963, p. 1, col. 1.

21 F. McDonald, The destruction of Dublin (Dublin, 1985), p. 24; ‘Building notes and news: “the lepers”: the truth behind the demolitions’, Build, Jan. 1966, pp. 12–13; ‘Halt the demolitions’, Build, Jan. 1967, p. 31; ‘“Vandalism” by landlords is alleged in dáil’, Irish Independent, 1 Feb. 1968, p. 12, col. 1.

22 P. Malone, Office development in Dublin, 1960–1980 (Dublin, 1981), pp. 54–8 for a complete list of office development in Co. Dublin in the period.

23 G. Cherry, ‘Reconstruction: its place in planning history’, in J. Diefendorf, ed., Rebuilding Europe's bombed cities (London, 1990), pp. 209–11; A. Ravetz, The government of space: town planning in modern society (London, 1986), p. 10; L. Esher, A broken wave: the rebuilding of England, 1940–1980 (London, 1980); P. Mandler, ‘New towns for old: the fate of the town centre’, in B. Conekin, F. Mort, and C. Waters, eds., Moments of modernity: reconstructing Britain, 1945–1964 (London, 1999), pp. 208–27; M. Bannon, ed., Planning: the Irish experience, 1920–1988 (Dublin, 1989); R. McManus, Dublin, 1910–1940: shaping the city and suburbs (Dublin, 2002); M. Daly, ed., County and town: one hundred years of local government in Ireland (Dublin, 2001).

24 M. Wright, Advisory regional plan and final report: the Dublin region (Dublin, 1965); C. Buchanan, Regional development in Ireland (Dublin, 1969); C. Abrams, Urban renewal project in Ireland (Dublin and New York, 1961); reports and printed documents of Dublin Corporation, Report No. 102, Report of the planning and development committee: with further reference to the north central area redevelopment scheme, p. 420.

25 J. Davis, ‘“Simple solutions to complex problems”: the greater London council and the greater London development plan, 1965–1973’, in J. Harris, ed., Civil society in British history: ideas, identities, institutions (Oxford, 2003), p. 249.

26 L. MacNeice, The collected poems of Louis MacNeice (London, 1979), p. 163.

27 Private members' business – planning appeals bill, 1967: second stage (resumed), Dáil Éireann, 28 February 1968, http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0232/D.0232.196802280041.html.

28 ‘The embalmed city’, New Statesman, 12 Apr. 1963, p. 529.

29 ‘Georgian heritage is not ignored’, Irish Times, 16 Dec. 1966, p. 15, col. 1.

30 Letter from Desmond Guinness, Irish Times, 23 June 1957, p. 5, col. 5.

31 Guinness, D., ‘Irish Georgian Society’, Quarterly Bulletin of the Irish Georgian Society, 1 (1958), p. 3Google Scholar.

32 J. White, Minority report: the Protestant community in the Irish Republic (Dublin, 1975); K. Bowen, Protestants in a Catholic state: Ireland's privileged minority (Dublin, 1983); B. Inglis, West Briton (London, 1962).

33 Preservation in Ireland’, Quarterly Bulletin of the Irish Georgian Society, 7 (1964), p. 45Google Scholar.

34 Memorandum in Frederick Rogerson papers, file 6717, Irish Architectural Archive (IAA) A00495 98/7 box 3.

35 ‘The House of Dillon’, Cellar, Nov. 1966, IAA RW.D203.

36 Interview with Ruadhán MacEoin, Apr. 2009; interview with Harold Clarke, Aug. 2009.

37 J. Molloy and A. Molloy, ‘Press release’, in IAA RW.D203.

38 Interview with Harold Clarke; Christie's auction catalogue for 19 North Great George's Street Dublin Ireland, available in IAA.

39 Molloy and Molloy, ‘Press release’.

40 ‘An Irishwoman's diary’, Irish Times, 18 Dec. 1967, p. 9, col. 7.

41 T. Bodkin, Report on the arts in Ireland (Dublin, 1951), p. 11.

42 For example Irish Georgian Society’, Quarterly Bulletin of the Irish Georgian Society, 8 (1965), p. 129Google Scholar.

43 ‘Plan for Mountjoy office block scheme outlined’, Irish Times, 13 Feb. 1968, p. 7, col. 6.

44 ‘Mountjoy Sq. office block appeal opens’, Irish Independent, 8 Feb. 1968, p. 3, col. 1.

45 ‘Building notes and news’, Build, July 1968, p. 11; ‘New move may save Mountjoy Square’, Irish Times, 10 Dec. 1969, p. 1, col. 7.

46 Mountjoy Square Estates, Mountjoy Square Dublin (Dublin, 1970), p. 1, in IAA RW.D203; ‘Mountjoy Sq. restoration interests purchasers’, Irish Times, 12 Aug. 1970, p. 5, col. 3.

47 Mountjoy Square Estates, Mountjoy Square Dublin, p. 11.

48 H. Clarke, ‘Do it yourself restoration’ in Clarke's private collection.

49 Molloy and Molloy, ‘Press release’.

50 ‘Pomeroy's Plan’, Hibernia, 24 Oct.– 6 Nov. 1969, p. 4.

51 Interview with Ruadhán MacEoin; ‘Uinseann MacEoin’, Irish Independent, 31 May 1968, p. 11, col. 1.

52 Under MacEoin's lead the Wolfe Tone Society was involved in the saving of Tailor's Hall alongside the Georgian Society.

53 Interview with Ruadhán MacEoin.

54 A common post-war problem: see Esher, A broken wave, p. 54.

55 Malone, Office development in Dublin, pp. 54–8.

56 Patterson, Ireland since 1939, pp. 166–70; McDonald, The destruction of Dublin.

57 ‘This is no plan’, Irish Architect and Contractor, May 1965, p. 15.

58 ‘A bad decision’, Build, Sept. 1968, p. 9.

59 Interview with Ruadhán MacEoin.

60 B. Hanley and S. Millar, The lost revolution: the story of the official IRA and the Workers' Party (Dublin, 2009), pp. 88–9.

61 Hanley and Millar, The lost revolution, pp. 97–8.

62 ‘Mountjoy Square tenants to petition minister’, Irish Times, 24 Feb. 1968, p. 9, col. 5.

63 ‘Housing battle on’, United Irishman, Feb. 1968, p. 1, col. 1.

64 ‘How many in 26 counties?’, United Irishman, Feb. 1969, p. 10, col. 3.

65 ‘Slums Forever?’, Build, Feb. 1969, p. 9.

66 ‘Protest meets mild response in Dublin’, Irish Times, 8 Apr. 1969, p. 1, col. 7; ‘Saturday's battle for the bridge’, Irish Times, 20 Jan. 1969, p. 4, col. 7.

67 D. Keogh, Twentieth-century Ireland: revolution and state building (Dublin, 2005), p. 306.

68 ‘Mrs MacSwiney supports Dennehy's actions’, Irish Times, 1 Feb. 1969, p. 10, col. 1.

69 Interview with Jennifer McCrea, Aug. 2009.

70 ‘Mumford in Dublin on Dublin’, Plan, July–Aug. 1971, p. 32.

71 ‘Dublin Corporation's Dublin’ Irish Times, 21 Nov. 1968, p. 11, col. 1.

72 See, for example, C. Hamnet, Unequal city (London, 2003); S. Zukin, Naked city: the death and life of authentic urban places (Oxford, 2010); T. Butler, Gentrification and the middle classes (Aldershot, 1997); S. Zukin, Loft living: culture and capital in urban change (London, 1988); D. Ley, The new middle class and the remaking of the central city (Oxford, 1996); N. Smith, The new urban frontier: gentrification and the revanchist city (London, 1996).

73 R. Glass, ‘Introduction’ in Centre for Urban Studies and R. Glass, eds., London: aspects of change (London, 1964), pp. xiii–xlii.

74 Ley, D., ‘Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification: a Canadian reassessment’, Annals of the association of American geographers, 76, (1986), pp. 521–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.