Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:50:20.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE IMPACT OF URBANIZATION ON MURDER RATES AND ON THE GEOGRAPHY OF HOMICIDE IN ENGLAND AND WALES, 1780–1850*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2010

PETER KING
PETER KING*
Affiliation:
Open University
*
Department of History, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6BJp.j.r.king@open.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although higher murder rates have traditionally been associated with large cities, this view has recently been challenged by several historians who have argued that ‘homicide rates were negatively correlated with urbanisation and industrialisation’, and this is rapidly becoming the new consensus. By exploring the geography of homicide rates for one area undergoing rapid urbanization and industrialization – England and Wales, 1780–1850 – this article challenges this new view and re-assesses the relationship between recorded homicide rates and both modernization and urbanization. After discussing the methodological problems involved in using homicide statistics, it focuses mainly on the first fifteen years for which detailed county-based data is available – 1834–48 – as well as looking at the more limited late eighteenth-century and early nineteenth-century evidence. This data raises fundamental questions about the links historians have recently made between urbanization and low homicide rates, since the remote rural parts of England and Wales generally had very low recorded murder rates while industrializing and rapidly urbanizing areas such as Lancashire had very high ones. Potential explanations for these systematic and large variations between urban and rural areas – including the impact of age structures and migration patterns – are then explored.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 671 - 698
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author would like to thank John Carter Wood, Ros Crone, Steve King, and all those who gave comments on this paper at the ‘History of crime’ Conference at the Open University, February 2009 as well as Bridget Lewis and Philippa Mitchell for their research assistance.

References

1 Eisner, M., ‘Long-term historical trends in violent crime’, Crime and Justice. A Review of Research, 30 (2003), p. 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar; E. Johnson, Urbanisation and crime: Germany, 1871–1914 (Cambridge, 1995), p. 13; Eisner, M., ‘Modernisation, self-control and lethal violence: the long-term dynamics of European homicide rates in theoretical perspective’, British Journal of Criminology, 41, (2001), pp. 618–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; S. Carroll, ‘Introduction’, in S. Carroll, ed., Cultures of violence: interpersonal violence in historical perspective (Basingstoke, 2007), p. 13.

2 Eisner, ‘Long-term’, p. 103.

3 E. Monkkonen, Murder in New York city (Berkeley, CA, 2001), pp. 11–16.

4 D. Archer and R. Gartner, Violence and crime in cross-national perspective (New Haven, CT, 1984), p. 104; F. Brookman, Understanding homicide (London, 2005), p. 29.

5 On parallel differences in Europe – P. Spierenburg, A history of murder (Cambridge, 2008), p. 212. For Durkheim and the Chicago school – F. Williams and M. McShane, Criminological theory (3rd edn, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999), pp. 54–60 and 92–5; Archer and Gartner, Violence, pp. 98–100; Lane, R., ‘Introduction’, Social Science History, 25 (2001), p.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Archer and Gartner, Violence, p. 98.

7 Monkkonen, Murder, pp. 7–22.

8 R. Lane, ‘Urban homicide in the nineteenth century: some lessons for the twentieth’, in J. Inciardi and C. Faupel, eds., History and crime (Beverly Hills, CA, 1980), pp. 91–109; R. Lane, Violent death in the city (Cambridge MA, 1979), p. 60; R. Lane, Murder in America (Columbus, OH, 1997), pp. 182–4, 296. Adler's work on Chicago's rising homicide rates was published after these conclusions were written – J. Adler, First in violence, deepest in dirt: homicide in Chicago, 1875–1920 (Cambridge, MA, 2006).

9 E. Johnson, ‘Urban and rural crime in Germany 1871–1914’, in E. Johnson and E. Monkkonen, eds., The civilisation of crime: violence in town and country since the middle ages (Chicago, IL, 1996), p. 231; Johnson, Urbanisation, pp. 12–13; Zehr, H., ‘The modernisation of crime in Germany and France 1830–1913’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 8 (1975), p. 129Google Scholar.

10 King, P., ‘Punishing assault: the transformation of attitudes in the English courts’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 27, (1996), pp. 46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; H. Zehr, Crime and the development of modern society. (London, 1976), pp. 115–19.

11 Zehr, Crime, pp. 114–19; Johnson, ‘Urban’, p. 240. P. Chassigne, Ville et violence (Paris, 2004), unfortunately uses only single years.

12 Johnson and Monkkonen, eds., The civilisation, p. 7.

13 Gurr, T., ‘Historical trends in violent crime: a critical review of the evidence’, Crime and Justice: An Annual Review, 3, (1981), pp. 295–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stone, L., ‘Interpersonal violence in English society, 1300–1980’, Past and Present, 101, (1983), pp. 22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sharpe, J., ‘Debate: the history of violence in England: some observations’, Past and Present, 108, (1985), pp. 206–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cockburn, J., ‘Patterns of violence in English society: homicide in Kent, 1560–1985’, Past and Present, 130, (1991), pp. 70–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shoemaker, R., ‘Male honour and the decline of public violence in eighteenth-century London’, Social History, 26 (2001), p. 190CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Eisner, ‘Modernisation’.

14 Eisner, ‘Modernisation’; Eisner ‘Long-term’; P. Spierenberg, ‘Long-term trends in homicide: theoretical reflections and the Dutch evidence, fifteenth to twentieth centuries’, in Johnson and Monkkonen, eds., The civilisation, pp. 63–105.

15 Eisner, ‘Modernisation’; Eisner, ‘Long-term’, p. 88; Eisner, M., ‘Modernity strikes back? A historical perspective on the latest increase in interpersonal violence (1960–1990)’, International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 2 (2008), p. 298Google Scholar.

16 Eisner, ‘Long-term’, pp. 102–6.

17 C. Emsley, Hard men: violence in England since 1750 (London, 2005), p. 73; Archer, J., ‘“The violence we have lost”; body counts, historians and interpersonal violence in England’, Memoria y Civilizacion, 2 (1999), p. 173Google Scholar; Sharpe, ‘Debate’, p. 208.

18 For a discussion see P. King, Crime, justice and discretion in England, 1740–1820 (Oxford, 2000), pp. 11–12, 132–4.

19 J. Havard, The detection of secret homicide (London, 1960), pp. 50–5; K. Watson, Poisoned lives (London, 2004), pp. 3–7.

20 Forbes, T., ‘Coroners’ inquests in the county of Middlesex, England, 1819–1842' Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 32, (1977), pp. 377–9Google ScholarPubMed.

21 Forbes, T., ‘Coroners' inquisitions from the county of Cheshire, 1817–1839 and 1877–1878’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 59, (1985), pp. 486–7Google Scholar; Forbes, T., ‘Coroner's quest’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 68, (1978), pp. 1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Archer, J., ‘Mysterious and suspicious deaths: missing homicides in north-west England, 1850–1900’, Crime, histoire et sociétés, 12, (2008), pp. 45–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Archer, ‘Mysterious’; Havard, The detection, pp. 44–68; L. Rose, Massacre of the innocents (London, 1986); R. Ireland, ‘“Perhaps my mother murdered me”: child death and the law in Victorian Carmarthenshire’, in C. Brooks and M. Lobban, eds., Communities and courts in Britain, 1150–1900 (London, 1997), pp. 229–44; Banks, S., ‘“Very little law in the case”: contests of honour and the subversion of the English criminal courts, 1780–1845’, King's Law Review, 19 (2008), p. 577Google Scholar.

23 Emmerichs, M., ‘Getting away with murder: homicide and the coroners in nineteenth-century London’, Social Science History, 25, (2001), pp. 93–100Google ScholarPubMed; V. Bailey, This rash act (Stanford, CA, 1998), p. 63; I. Burney, Bodies of evidence: medicine and the politics of the English inquest, 1830–1926 (Baltimore, MD, 2000).

24 Fisher, P., ‘Getting away with murder? The suppression of coroners’ inquests in early Victorian England and Wales', Local Population Studies, 78, (2007), pp. 47–62Google Scholar; Archer, ‘Mysterious’; Taylor, H., ‘Rationing crime: the political economy of criminal statistics since the 1850s’, Economic History Review, 51, (1998), pp. 569–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Havard, The detection, p. 64.

26 Fisher, ‘Getting’, p. 55; Havard, The detection, p. 58; Archer, ‘Mysterious’, p. 48.

27 P. King, Narratives of the poor in eighteenth-century Britain, iv: Institutional responses: the refuge for the destitute (London, 2006), pp. 204, 358–9; Lane, Violent, p. 73.

28 The National Archives (TNA), Assi 24/42, 25 Mar. 1776; J. Beattie, Crime and the courts in England, 1660–1800 (Oxford, 1986), p. 84; P. James and T. Critchley, The maul and the pear tree (London, 1971).

29 Brookman, Understanding homicide, p. 31.

30 On body counts – Spierenberg, P., ‘Faces of violence: homicide trends and cultural meanings: Amsterdam, 1471–1816’, Journal of Social History, 27 (1994), p. 70Google Scholar.

31 On murder/manslaughter see M. Wiener, Men of blood: violence, manliness and criminal justice in Victorian England (Cambridge, 2004), pp. 25–7; and for an excellent discussion of why the two must be treated together – Spierenburg, ‘Long-term trends’, pp. 69–70. For a good recent discussion of this artificial line and of the fact that what is an acceptable or an unacceptable killing is, of course, socially constructed and historically contingent see Brookman, Understanding homicide, pp. 2–3. Beattie's work suggests that manslaughter charges were rarely used until about 1800, the practice being to indict for murder but then allow juries routinely to reduce to manslaughter. 6 out of 315 indictments were for manslaughter not murder in Surrey 1660–1800. Beattie, Crime, p. 84.

32 Beattie does not analyse spatial variations in infanticide – Beattie, Crime, pp. 108–24.

33 Ibid., p.108.

34 TNA, Assi 35/180–239 and 31/2–20, HO 26/ 1- 11. Rates calculated using Wrigley, E., ‘English county populations in the later eighteenth century’, Economic History Review, 60, (2007), pp. 54–5Google Scholar.

35 Parliamentary Papers (PP) 1802, vii, and A. Brown, Essex at work, 1700–1815 (Chelmsford, 1969), pp. 100 and 111–28 for the seven towns – Bocking, Braintree, Halstead, Colchester, Saffron Walden, Harwich, and Chelmsford.

36 On not founds Beattie, Crime, p. 90.

37 TNA, Assi 41/8–9; E. Evans, The forging of the modern state: early industrial Britain (2nd edn, London, 1996), pp. 430–2.

38 Based on the sources listed in P. King, ‘War as a judicial resource: press gangs and prosecution rates, 1740–1830’, in N. Landau, ed., Law, crime and English society, 1660–1830 (Cambridge, 2002), p. 99.

39 P. King, ‘Changing attitudes to violence in the Cornish courts, 1730–1830’, in P. King, Crime and law in England, 1750–1840: remaking justice from the margins (Cambridge, 2006), pp. 255–78. Cornish murder rates fell 50 per cent between 1770–89 and 1810–29.

40 The 1834–48 data PP 1835, xlv; 1836, xli; 1837, xlvi; 1837–8, xliii; 1839, xxxviii; 1840, xxxviii; 1841, xviii; 1842, xxxii; 1843, xlii; 1844, xxxix; 1845, xxxvii; 1846, xxxiv; 1847, xlvii; 1847–8, lii; 1849, xliv. When a murder charge was reduced by the jury to manslaughter it was recorded as the latter.

41 M. Jackson, New-born child murder: women, illegitimacy and the courts in eighteenth-century England (Manchester, 1996), pp. 168–77.

42 V. Gatrell, ‘The decline of theft and violence in Victorian and Edwardian England’,in V. Gatrell, B. Lenham, and G. Parker, eds., Crime and the law (London, 1980), pp. 342–5; Eisner, ‘Long-term’, p. 90.

43 www.oldbaileyonline – for Central Criminal Court 1834–48; Gatrell, ‘The decline’, p. 342; PP 1835, xlv.

44 Figure 1 based on PP 1819, viii, pp. 28–31; PP 1828, vi, pp. 276–87; PP 1835, xl, pp. 22–5, and references in n. 40.

45 Gatrell, ‘The decline’, pp. 287 and 342–5; Spierenburg, A history, p. 209; Eisner, ‘Modernity strikes back?’.

46 J. Carter Wood, Violence and crime in nineteenth-century England. The shadow of our refinement (London 2004), p. 30; Wiener, Men, pp. 25–6.

47 The counties amalgamated had populations under 60,000 inhabitants.

48 King, ‘Changing’; Deacon, B., ‘Proto-industrialisation and potatoes: a revised narrative for nineteenth-century Cornwall’, Cornish Studies, 5 (1997), p. 61Google Scholar.

49 J. Langton and R. Morris, eds., Atlas of industrialising Britain, 1780–1914 (London, 1985), p. 31.

50 Ibid., pp. 32, 167–75.

51 Even when combined the Breconshire and Radnorshire population was only 78,000.

52 L. Schwarz, London in the age of industrialisation: entrepreneurs, labour force and living conditions, 1700–1850 (Cambridge, 1992), p. 2; Evans, The forging, pp. 430–2.

53 Fisher, ‘Getting’, p. 56.

54 Ibid., pp. 50–61. In Norfolk, the crackdown came late in 1844 – twenty murder cases 1842–4, and twenty-one 1845–7. In Devon inquest costs were halved 1844–46 – sixteen murder cases 1842–4 and twenty-five 1845–7.

55 Burney, Bodies, pp. 52–60; Havard, The detection, p. 49; Fisher, ‘Getting’, p. 52; Rose, Massacre, pp. 62–3.

56 Fisher, ‘Getting’, p. 49; Forbes, ‘Coroners’ inquests', p. 377; Forbes, ‘Coroner's quest’, p. 13.

57 Gatrell, ‘The decline’, pp. 247 and 293.

58 Taylor, ‘Rationing’, pp. 569–90.

59 Archer, ‘Mysterious’, p. 48; Gatrell, ‘The decline’, p. 248.

60 D. Philips and R. Storch, Policing provincial England, 1829–1856: the politics of reform (Leicester, 1999), pp. 84–92.

61 Havard, The detection, pp. 57–8.

62 C. Emsley, The English police: a political and social history (London, 1991), pp. 24–5; R. Morris, ‘“Crime does not pay”: thinking again about detectives in the first century of the Metropolitan Police’, in C. Emsley and H. Shpayer-Makov, eds., Police detectives in history, 1750–1950 (Aldershot, 2006), p. 79–81; and the introduction – C. Emsley and H. Shpayer-Makov, ‘The police detective and police history’, p. 4; Gatrell, ‘The decline’, p. 296.

63 Philips and Storch, Policing, p. 157; C. Emsley, Policing and its context, 1750–1870 (London, 1983), pp. 67–74.

64 ‘It is safe to use 1838 as an approximate line between unreformed and reformed police work’, E. Midwinter, Social administration in Lancashire, 1830–1860 (Manchester, 1969), p. 136; S. Palmer, Policing and protest in England and Ireland, 1780–1850 (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 407–20. Liverpool was different – M. Brogden, The police: anatomy and consent (London, 1982), pp. 56–60.

65 Philips and Storch, Policing, p. 157, and D. Jones, Crime in nineteenth-century Wales (Cardiff, 1992), p. 205.

66 J. Stevenson, Popular disturbances in England, 1700–1870 (London, 1979), pp. 218–28; Midwinter, Social, p. 168; D. Jones, Rebecca's children (Oxford, 1989), p. 2; A. Charlesworth, An atlas of rural protest in Britain, 1548–1900 (London, 1983), pp. 163–71; J. Archer, By flash and a scare (Oxford, 1990).

67 Palmer, Policing, p. 435.

68 D. Thompson, The chartists: popular politics in the industrial revolution (London, 1984), p. 80; D. Jones, Before Rebecca: popular protests in Wales, 1793–1835 (London, 1973), pp. 186–7.

69 M. Freeman, ‘Transport’, in Langton and Morris, eds., Atlas, p. 89.

70 PP 1819, viii (585), p. 313, and 1843, xli, pp. 5–6; King, Crime and law, pp. 66–8; Jones, Crime, pp. 6–12

71 Jones, Rebecca's children, pp. 180–1; Jones, Crime, p. 73; Ireland, ‘Perhaps’, p. 244; PP 1839, xix, p. 42; J. Langton, ‘Languages and dialects’, in Langton and Morris, eds., Atlas, p. 203.

72 C. Conley, Certain other countries (Columbus, OH, 2007), p. 45; Jones, Crime, pp. 65 and 69; D. Gareth Evans, A history of Wales, 1815–1906 (Cardiff, 1989), pp. 11 and 70.

73 PP 1839, xix, p. 43; K. Snell, Parish and belonging (Cambridge, 2006), pp. 1–80.

74 For modern criminological theories – S. Jones, Understanding violent crime (Buckingham, 2000).

75 J. Fletcher, Summary of the moral statistics of England and Wales (London, 1848); Rawson, R., ‘An inquiry into the statistics of crime in England and Wales’, Journal of the Statistical Society, 2 (1839), p. 322Google Scholar; Redgrave, S., ‘Abstract of criminal tables for England and Wales, 1837’, Journal of the Statistical Society, 1, (1839), pp. 231–45Google Scholar; T. Plint, Crime in England, its relation, character and extent from 1801 to 1848 (London, 1851); Emsley, Hard, p. 72; J. Shuttleworth, The moral and physical condition of the working classes (1832, reprinted London, 1970), pp. 4–8, 23, 42; D. Jones, Crime, protest, community and police in nineteenth-century Britain (London, 1982), pp. 144–55; Wood, Violence, pp. 95–118.

76 TNA HO 26/ 1–11; PP, 1835, xlv.

77 P. Lawton, ‘Population’, in Langton and Morris, eds., Atlas, p. 17.

78 R. Lawton and C. Pooley, Britain, 1740: an historical geography (London, 1992), p. 134.

79 PP 1843, xxiii (497); King, P., ‘Making crime news: newspapers, violent crime and the selective reporting of Old Bailey trials in the late eighteenth century’, Crime, histoire et sociétés, 13, (2009), pp. 105–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wiener, Men, pp. 40–75; D. Macraild, The Irish in Britain, 1800–1914 (Dublin, 2006), p. 59.

80 I. Whyte, Migration and society in Britain, 1550–1830 (Basingstoke, 2000), pp. 138–53.

81 Jones, Crime, protest, pp. 86 and 104–5; J. Davies, A history of Wales (London, 1993), p. 356; P. O'Leary, Immigration and integration (Cardiff, 2000), pp. 45, 111–13, 167–73.

82 Lawton, ‘Population’, p. 25.

83 D. Fitzpatrick, ‘A peculiar and tramping people: the Irish in Britain, 1801–1870’, in V. Vaughan, ed., A new history of Ireland, v (Oxford, 1989), p. 660; Swift, R., ‘Heroes or villains? The Irish, crime and disorder in Victorian England’, Albion, 29 (1997), p. 414CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 TNA HO 26/ 1–12. Further research will appear in P. King and J. Carter Wood, Ethnicity, crime and justice in England 1700–1825 (forthcoming).

85 T. Beames, The rookeries of London (1850, reprinted London, 1970), p. 113; Wiener, Men, p. 60; PP 1814–15, iii, p. 1; Conley, Certain, p. 53; In 1871 Irish-born were 14 per cent of the Glasgow population Fitzpatrick, ‘A peculiar’, p. 659.

86 Jones, Crime, p. 78; R. Swift, ‘Crime and the Irish in nineteenth-century Britain’, in R. Swift and S. Gilley, eds., The Irish in Britain, 1815–1939 (London, 1989), p. 166; R. Swift, ed., Irish migrants in Britain, 1815–1914 (Cork, 2002), p. 35.

87 Swift, ‘Heroes’, pp. 408–11; Macraild, The Irish, pp. 58–9; Wood, Violence, pp. 3–14 and 47–69.

88 C. Conley, Melancholy accidents: the meaning of violence in post-famine Ireland (Lanham, MD, 1999), pp. 3–17.

89 Ibid., pp. 20–8; R. Swift, ‘Behaving badly? Irish migrants and crime in the Victorian city’, in J. Rowbottom and K. Stevenson, eds., Criminal conversations (Columbus, OH, 2005), p. 114; O'Leary, Immigration, p. 174; on similar English traditions – Snell, Parish, p. 57.

90 Swift, ‘Crime’ p. 166–9; www.oldbaileyonline t17990508–21.

91 The Scots and Welsh were also over represented amongst the Old Bailey murder accused but not to anywhere like the extent that the Irish were – Conley, Certain, p. 45.

92 Sharpe, J., ‘Domestic homicide in early modern England’, Historical Journal, 24, (1981), pp. 29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Spierenberg, ‘Faces’.

93 See P. King, ‘The geography of recorded homicide rates in early and mid-nineteenth century Scotland’ (forthcoming).

94 L. Shelley, Crime and modernisation; the impact of industrialisation and urbanisation on crime (Carbondale, IL, 1981), pp. 1–37.

95 However Eisner's current research using smaller administrative units within countries (similar to Figure 2) will hopefully provide the data needed.

96 E. Ferri, L'Omicidio (Turin, 1895), pp. 281–325.