Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:02:07.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SOUTH ASIAN HISTORIES OF CITIZENSHIP, 1946–1970*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2012

JOYA CHATTERJI
JOYA CHATTERJI*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
*
Trinity College, Cambridge CB2 1TQjc280@cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After partition, minorities in South Asia emerged as a distinct legal category of citizens who were not fully protected by the states within which they lived. The power of South Asia's nation-states over their ‘minority-citizens’ far exceeds their sovereignty over ordinary citizens, and the capacity of ‘minority-citizens’ to resist this power was broken, this article will show, by a series of draconian executive actions. But ‘minority citizenship’ was not simply a product of ‘bureaucratic rationality’, as some have suggested, or even of ‘governmentality’. On the contrary, it was produced by complex, often violent, interactions between government and a range of non-state actors, who forced their own ideas of nationality, justice, and entitlement on to the statute books. Citizenship in South Asia thus proves to have a complex parenthood, with ‘civil’ and ‘political’ more entangled, and mutually constituted, than some theorists would have us believe. India and Pakistan continued to be bound together by migrants and migration even as their discursive claims seemed to pull them ever further apart.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 1049 - 1071
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to Sunil Amrith, David Feldman, John Lonsdale, Fiona McConnell, and David Washbrook for their detailed comments on an earlier version of this article; to Tim Harper for kindly organizing a workshop to discuss its main themes; to Jasdeep Brar for summarizing the rich case law on the permit system; to the Newton Trust which provided a small grant for that purpose; to Newal Osman who procured rare published sources from Karachi and Islamabad; and to the Arts and Humanities Research Council (UK), which funded the early stages of this research.

References

1 See, for instance, Kim, Keechang, Aliens in medieval law: the origins of modern citizenship (Cambridge, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Kohn, Hans, The idea of nationalism: a study in its origins and background (1944) (New Brunswick, NJ, 2005)Google Scholar, passim.

3 Michael Walzer, ‘Citizenship’, in Terence Ball, James Farr, and Russell L. Hanson, eds., Political innovation and conceptual change (Cambridge, 1995).

4 Shani, Ornit, ‘Conceptions of citizenship in India and the “Muslim question”’, Modern Asian Studies, 44 (2010), pp. 145–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Neeraja Gopal Jayal, ‘Genealogies of rights’, unpublished lecture.

6 Holsten, James, Insurgent citizenship: disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil (Princeton, NJ, 2008), p. 7Google Scholar.

7 Chatterjee, Partha, The politics of the governed (New York, NY, 2004)Google Scholar.

8 Zamindar, Vazira F., The long partition and the making of modern South Asia: refugees, boundaries, histories (New York, NY, 2007), p. 7Google Scholar and passim.

9 Migdal, Joel S., State in society: studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another (Cambridge, 2009), p. 23Google Scholar.

10 Sherman, Taylor C., ‘Migration, citizenship and belonging in Hyderabad (Deccan), 1946–1956’, Modern Asian Studies, 45 (2011), pp. 81–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Migdal, State in society, p. 12.

12 Holsten, Insurgent citizenship, p. 7.

13 The ‘constitution of India bill’ of 1895 merely stated that all ‘those born in India’ or naturalized therein would be Indian citizens. Rao, B. Shiva, ed., The framing of India's constitution: select documents (5 vols., New Delhi, 1966)Google Scholar, i, p. 6. The Nehru Report of 1928 took a similar line. Ibid., p. 59.

14 Benhabib, Seyla, The rights of others: aliens, residents and citizens (Cambridge, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 See the responses to the questionnaire ‘safeguards’ sent on 28 Feb. 1947 to the sub-committees on fundamental rights and minority rights. Shiva Rao, ed., India's constitution, ii, pp. 391–2. Also see Pant's speech on the subject in the Constituent Assembly on 24 Jan. 1947. Constituent Assembly of India: debates (12 vols., Faridabad, 1947–51) (CAID), ii, p. 328.

16 CAID, iii, p. 417.

17 Banerjee, Sukanya, Becoming imperial citizens: Indians in late-Victorian empire (Durham, NC, and London, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tabili, Laura, ‘We ask for British justice’: workers and racial difference in late imperial Britain (New York, NY, 1994)Google Scholar, passim.

18 For the numerous iterations of this sentiment by Congress since 1895, see Shiva Rao, ed., India's constitution, i. The Sapru Report (1945) also held firm to this notion of citizenship.

19 See K. M. Munshi's speech in defence of Clause 3 on 29 Apr.1947. CAID, iii, p. 424.

20 See Patel's defence of Clause 3 made minutes later on the same day, ibid.

21 Ibid., p. 526.

22 See Pant's speech on 24 Jan. 1947, CAID, ii, p. 332.

23 ‘Note on fundamental rights by B. N. Rau, 2 Sept. 1946’, in Shiva Rao, ed., India's constitution, ii, pp. 21–55.

24 Rau, B. N., India's constitution in the making (Calcutta, 1960)Google Scholar, passim.

25 CAID, iii, p. 419.

26 See R. V. Dhulekar's question on this subject. Ibid., p. 421.

27 Ibid., p. 423.

28 See his remark urging K. Santhanam to withdraw his proposed amendment to this new clause. Ibid.

29 CAID, iii, p. 527.

30 See the remarks by B. R. Ambedkar and C. Rajagopalachariar on 2 May 1947. CAID, iii, p. 527; and Pandey, Gyanendra, ‘Can a Muslim be an Indian?’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 41 (1999), pp. 608–29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

31 Constituent Assembly of Pakistan. Debates (16 vols., Karachi, 1947–54) (CADP), i, no. 2, pp. 16–20.

32 Jinnah's speech ‘Those who gave great sacrifices’, 9 June 1947, cited in Naqvi, Tahir Hasnain, ‘The politics of commensuration: the violence of partition and the making of the Pakistani state’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 20 (2007), p. 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 CADP, i, no. 2, p. 16.

34 Bajpai's perceptive new discussion of the Indian Constituent Assembly debates focuses on the content of the speeches and the ideas that underpinned them, disregarding context outside the Assembly. Bajpai, Rochana, Debating difference: group rights and liberal democracy in India (New Delhi, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. This article, in contrast, interprets the significant shifts in the Assembly's line towards minorities in the light of the rapidly evolving political situation outside it.

35 Sherman, ‘Migration, citizenship and belonging’.

36 Giorgio Agamben, State of exception (translated by Kevin Attrell) (Chicago, IL, 2005).

37 Telegram from Patel to the governor of East Punjab, 24 Aug. 1947, Das, Durga, ed., Sardar Patel's correspondence (10 vols., Ahmedabad, 1971)Google Scholar (SPC), iv, p. 249.

38 Ian Talbot, ‘The August 1947 violence in Sheikhpura City’, unpublished paper, Honolulu (Apr. 2011).

39 Telegram from Sampuran Singh to Patel, 27 Aug. 1947, SPC, iv, p. 256.

40 Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs papers, National Archives of India (MEAI) F./2–1/48-Pak i (vol. i).

41 Note from Lt Col Kirpal to the Joint Defence Council, 28 Aug. 1947. Mountbatten papers (Mountbatten papers database, University of Southampton), section i (MB1), D/46/3.

42 The role played by social workers in shaping policy will be discussed in the larger work on which this article is based. Joya Chatterji, The disinherited: migrants, minorities and citizenship in South Asia, 1946–1970 (forthcoming).

43 Salma Tasasaddaque Hussain to M. A. Jinnah, 22 Aug. 1947, Zaidi, Z. H., ed., Jinnah papers: first series (18 vols,, Islamabad, 1998–2011)Google Scholar, v, p. 90.

44 Kamran, Tahir, ‘The unfolding crisis in Punjab, March–August, 1947: key turning points and British responses’, Journal of Punjab Studies, 14 (2007), pp. 187–210Google Scholar.

45 Copland, Ian, ‘The further shores of partition: ethnic cleansing in Rajasthan, 1947’, Past and Present, 160 (1998), pp. 203–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 See Rajendra Prasad to Patel, 10 Sept. 1947; and Patel's reply to Prasad, 12 Sept. 1947, SPC, iv, pp. 340–1.

47 See Patel's directions of 3 Oct. 1947 that 'we should insist that our motor transport convoys bring in our refugees', ibid., p. 308.

48 Enclosure in Jairamdas Doulatram to Patel, 24 Sept. 1947, SPC, iv, p. 373.

49 Baldev Singh to Patel, 6 Oct. 1947, ibid., pp. 348–9.

50 Menon, Ritu and Bhasin, Kamla, Borders and boundaries: women in India's partition (New Delhi, 1998)Google Scholar.

51 E.g. Jeffrey, Robin, ‘The Punjab boundary force and the problem of order, 1947’, Modern Asian Studies, 8 (1974), pp. 491–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kamran, ‘The unfolding crisis’.

52 E.g. Menon and Bhasin, Borders.

53 See for instance, Nehru to Liaquat Ali Khan, 9 Aug. 1947, and Liaquat Ali Khan to Nehru, 22 Aug. 1947, SPC, iv, pp. 247–8.

54 Randhawa, M. S., Out of the ashes: an account of the rehabilitation of refugees from West Pakistan in rural areas of East Punjab (Chandigarh, 1954)Google Scholar.

55 Joya Chatterji, ‘Mutuality and cooperation in South Asia: an alternative history of India–Pakistan relations’ (unpublished lecture, Royal Asiatic Society, Mar. 2012).

56 MEAI/ F.8–15/48/Pak-i (Secret); for Pakistan see memo by A. Rashid Ibrahim dated 25 May 1948, REF No. 315-Cord/48, MEAI/F.8–14/48-Pak-i (Secret); and MEAI/F. 10(9)/Pak (A)/1949.

57 Such cases run into the thousands. See, for instance, MEAI/F.9–10/48-Pak i.

58 See the introduction to the Government of East Punjab Evacuees (Administration of Property) Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947).

59 See for instance, Administration of the Dhar state for 1939–1940 (Dhar, 1940); Ruling princes and chiefs of India: a brief historical record of the leading princes and chiefs in India together with a description of their territories and methods of administration (Bombay, 1930).

60 Zamindar, The long partition, passim; Chatterji, Joya, The spoils of partition. Bengal and India, 1947–1967 (Cambridge, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, ch. 3; Ansari, Sarah, Life after partition: migration, community and strife, 1947–1962 (Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar, passim.

61 For examples from West Bengal, see Government of Bengal Intelligence Bureau (Calcutta) (GB IB), 1838–48(KW) and GB IB 1809–48 (Nadia). For instances in Delhi, see Delhi State Archives (DSA), 16/48/DC, and DSA, DCO/259/47.

62 M. L. Mehra to the district commissioner of Delhi, 9 Oct. 1948, DSA, DC, 16/48.

63 Noor Ahmed to J. M. L. Prabhu (custodian of evacuee property), New Delhi, 13 Nov. 1947, DSA, DC, 191/1947.

64 For an account of one celebrated battle by the refugees of ‘Azadgarh’ squatter colony south of Calcutta, see Guha, B. S., Memoir no. 1, 1954. Studies in social tensions among the refugees from Eastern Pakistan (Calcutta, 1959)Google Scholar; and Chatterji, Joya, ‘“Dispersal” and the failure of rehabilitation: refugee camp-dwellers and squatters in West Bengal’, Modern Asian Studies, 41 (2007), pp. 955–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 Ansari, Life after partition, passim.

66 Engin F. Isin, ‘Theorising acts of citizenship’, in Engin F. Isin and Greg M. Neilson eds., Acts of citizenship (London, 2008), pp. 17, 26.

67 GB IB File No. 1838–48 (KW).

68 Superintendent of police to deputy inspector general of police, Delhi, 20 Dec. 1947, DSA, DC, 259/47.

69 Deputy inspector general of police to the chief commissioner, Delhi, 20 Dec. 1947, DSA, DC, 259/47.

70 Nehru to Patel, 6 Oct. 1947, SPC, iv, p. 400.

71 Ibid.

72 Ordinance xxxiv of 1948, MEAI/ F.26–189/48-Pak i (Secret).

73 ‘Rules regarding permit system introduced between India and Pakistan’, Notification No. ii(55)/48-General, Gazette of India, 14 Sept. 1948.

74 Zamindar, The long partition, p. 82.

75 Ibid., pp. 79–95.

76 V. D. Moray, Bombay CID, to A. Jayaram, 14 Sept. 1948, MEAI/Pak-i Section, F. 26–189/48-Pak i (Secret).

77 See, for instance, the lengthy discussions about whether the permits of Noor Mohamed and Ishaque Khan, two Muslims ‘found’ in Nagpur, were fake or authentic. Ibid.

78 Sadiq, Kamal, Paper citizens: how illegal immigrants acquire citizenship in developing countries (Oxford, 2009)Google Scholar.

79 C. N. Chandra, secretary, ministry of rehabilitation, to all chief secretaries, 9 May 1949, GB IB. 1210–48 (4).

80 AIR 1964 MP 272 Bench: H. Krishnan, P. Sharma.

81 For the difficulties appellants faced in proving their claims, see any of the 6,000-odd cases fought in the Indian courts; e.g. The State of Mysore v. Abdul Salam on 5 July 1951; or Nazir Hussain v. The State on 13 Dec. 1951, in which the judge described the plaintiff's case as ‘balderdash’.

82 ‘An ordinance to provide for the administration of evacuee property and for certain matters connected therewith’, Ordinance No. xxvii of 1949, Gazette of India, 18 Oct. 1949, MEAI, F. 17–39/49-AFRI.

83 The reasons why India excluded West Bengal, Assam, and Tripura from the evacuee property regime are addressed in Chatterji, The disinherited.

84 Ordinance No. xxvii of 1949.

85 T. H. Marshall, ‘Citizenship and social class’ (1950), reprinted in Manza, J. and Sander, M., eds., Inequality and society (New York, NY, 2009)Google Scholar.

86 Kim, Aliens in medieval law, passim; Caitlin Anderson, ‘Britons abroad, aliens at home: nationality law and policy in Britain, 1815–1870’ (doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, 2004), passim.

87 Pakistan promulgated a central Evacuee Property Ordinance in Oct. 1949. ‘The problem of evacuee property and efforts made to solve it’, MEAI/11(21)/49-Pak iii (Secret).

88 (India) Act XXXXIV of 1954, 9 Oct. 1954.

89 Syed, Nazar Abbas, ed., Edition 2008: the citizenship laws with NADRA laws (Lahore, 2008)Google Scholar.

90 Markovits, C.Pouchepadass, J., and Subrahmanyam, S., eds., Society and circulation: mobile people and itinerant cultures in South Asia, 1750–1950 (Delhi, 2003)Google Scholar.

91 Chatterji, The disinherited.

92 Barkat, Abul et al. , Political economy of the Vested Property Act in rural Bangladesh (Dhaka, 1997)Google Scholar; Farooqui, M. I., Law of abandoned property (Dhaka, 2000)Google Scholar; Ghosh, Papiya, Partition and the South Asian diaspora: extending the subcontinent (Delhi, 2007)Google Scholar.

93 Memo by B. F. H. B. Tyabji dated 23 Aug. 1952, MEAI (AFR ii Branch)/aii/53/6491/ 31 (Secret).

94 MEAI/Aii/52/6423/31 (1952) (Secret).

95 File note dated 20 Apr. 1950, MEAI/17–39/49-AFRI (Secret).

96 MEAI/17–39/49-AFRI (Secret) and MEAI/Aii/ 52/6423/31 (1952, Secret).

97 Fischer-Tine, Harald, ‘Indian nationalism and the world forces: transnational and diasporic dimensions of the Indian freedom movement on the eve of the First World War’, Journal of Global History, 2 (2007), pp. 325–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

98 So in 1949, India advised that ‘in the changed political circumstances of the two countries … the best thing would be for all Indians who were qualified to be Ceylon citizens to apply for [Ceylonese] citizenship without hesitation’. MEAI/F.7/49–8Ci (C) (Secret).

99 Syed, ed., The citizenship laws, p. 14.

100 Ong, Aihwa, Flexible citizenship: the cultural logics of transnationality (Durham, NC, 1999)Google Scholar.

101 Brubaker, Rogers, Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany (Cambridge MA, 1992)Google Scholar.