Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:12:42.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

V. Mechanics' Institutes and the Working Classes, 1840–1860

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Edward Royle
Edward Royle
Affiliation:
Selwyn College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The history of mechanics’ institutes ‘is at once beautiful and terrible to read', Christopher Charles Cattell, the Birmingham radical republican, told the members of his Eclectic Institute in 1854. Contemporaries of the mechanics’ institute movement in the mid-nineteenth century were acutely aware of this terrible history. ‘The banquet was prepared for guests who did not come …,’ wrote Robert Elliott in 1861. J. W. Hudson referred to ‘The universal complaint that Mechanics’ Institutions are attended by persons of a higher rank than those for whom they were designed…’ The Westminster Review continued the lament, Samuel Smiles, Lloyd Jones and J. M. Ludlow joined the chorus, and later historians have followed the tune. E. P. Thompson, for example, writes: ‘After the mid-Twenties the tendency was general for the custom of artisans to give way to that of the lower middle class, and for orthodox political economy to come into the syllabus.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 1971 , pp. 305 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cattell, C. C., Mechanics’ Institutes in their relation to the industrious classes … (Birmingham [1854]), p. 5.Google Scholar

2 Elliott, Robert, ‘On the Working Men's Reading Rooms, as established in 1848 at Carlisle’, Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science (1861), p. 676Google Scholar; Hudson, J. W., The History of Adult Education … (London, 1851), p. viiGoogle Scholar; Westminster Review, XLI, 2 (1844), p. 427Google Scholar; Smiles, Samuel, evidence to the Select Committee on Public Libraries (1849), Qs. 1956, 1968, 1983, 2000Google Scholar; Ludlow, J. M. and Jones, Lloyd, Progress of the Wording Class, 1832–1867 (London, 1867), p. 86.Google Scholar The principal contemporary sources used and referred to in this article are [Coates, Thomas], Report of the State of Literary, Scientific, and Mechanics’ Institutions … (London, 1841)Google Scholar; Hudson, J. W., op. cit.Google Scholar; and Hole, James, An Essay on the History and Management of Literary, Scientific and Mechanics’ Institutions … (London, 1853).Google Scholar

3 Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Wording Class (London, 1963), p. 745Google Scholar; see also Altick, R. D., The English Common Reader (Chicago, 1957)Google Scholar, Simon, B., Studies in the History of Education, 1780–1870 (London, 1960)Google Scholar, Silver, H., The Concept of Popular Education … (London, 1965)Google Scholar, and Kuczynski, J., The Rise of the Wording Class (London, 1967).Google Scholar

4 Langley, J. B., evidence to the S.C. on Public Libraries (1849), app. IIIGoogle Scholar; Coates, p. 11; Hole, p. 19; see also Hudson, pp. 52, 97–8, 153–4.

5 Coates, pp. 14–15, 22; Ludlow, and Jones, , op. cit. p. 174Google Scholar; Hole, p. 24; Dawson, George, evidence to the S.C. on Public Libraries (1849), Q. 1220Google Scholar; Holyoake, G. J., Literary Institutions … (London, 1849), p. 12.Google Scholar

6 Engels, F., The Condition of the Wording Class in England in 1844 (as published in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels on Britain (2nd ed., London, 1962) ), pp. 274–5.Google Scholar

7 Simon, B., op. cit. p. 216Google Scholar; Salt, John, ‘The Creation of the Sheffield Mechanics’ Institute’, The Vocational Aspect, XVIII, 40 (Summer 1966)Google Scholar; see also Altick, R. D., op. cit. p. 188.Google Scholar

8 Holt, G., A Complete Exposure of the Abuses of the Leicester Mechanics’ Institute … (Leicester, 1835), introduction.Google Scholar

9 This question is raised by Harrison, J. F. C., Learning and Living, 1790–1960 (London, 1961), p. 58.Google Scholar

10 Hole, pp. 17, 11; Tylecote, M., in her admirable and judicious study, The Mechanics’ Institutes of Lancashire and Yorkshire before 1851 (Manchester, 1957), p. 292, reaches this same conclusion.Google Scholar

11 Blake, Barnett, ‘The Mechanics’ Institutes of Yorkshire’, T.N.A.P.S.S. (1859), p. 335.Google Scholar

12 J. V. Godwin, ‘The Bradford Mechanics’ Institute’, ibid. pp. 344–5. The most generous estimate of the work of the mechanics’ institutes is that in Kelly, Thomas, George Birkbeck (Liverpool, 1957). pp. 207–77.Google Scholar

13 Review, Westminster, loc. cit. pp. 417–18.Google Scholar

14 Traice, W. H. J., Handbook of Mechanics’ Institutions … (London, 1856), p. 21Google Scholar; Blake, Barnett, loc. cit. p. 338Google Scholar; Hole, p. 29, also p. 31 ff.; Kelly, , op. cit. p. 240.Google Scholar

15 Smith, W. Hawkes, ‘On the tendency and prospects of Mechanics’ Institutions’, Analyst, II, 11 (06, 1835), p. 337.Google Scholar

16 Sandford, H. R., ‘Evening Classes and the Associations for promoting them’, T.N.A.P.S.S. (1864), p. 426Google Scholar; Barnett Blake, ibid. (1859), p. 336.

17 Traice, , op. cit. pp. 6–7.Google Scholar

18 Curzon, F., ‘Some Statistics of the Huddersfield Mechanics’ Institute’, T.N.A.P.S.S. (1859), pp. 346–7Google Scholar; J. W. Hudson, p. 133; Tylecote, M., op. cit. p. 255Google Scholar; Blake, B., loc. cit. pp. 335–6Google Scholar; Review, Westminster, loc. cit. pp. 429–30.Google Scholar

19 Report of the West Riding Union of Mechanics’ Institutes, April 1840-quoted by Coates, p. 23 (this is used as evidence of the failure of mechanics’ institutes by Tylecote, pp. 74–5, and by Simon, p. 254); see also note 29 below.

20 Annual Report of the Yorkshire Union of Mechanics’ Institutes (1859), quoted by Curtis, S. J., History of Education in Great Britain (5th ed., London, 1963), pp. 473–4Google Scholar; see also Blake, B., loc. cit. p. 335Google Scholar

21 Hudson, p. 130.

22 Ibid. p. 135.

23 Coates, pp. 19–20; also Review, Westminster, loc. cit. pp. 428–9Google Scholar; Hudson, pp. 92, 131, 87, 61; also Hole, p. 18.

24 Hudson, pp. 94, 88; Tylecote, , op. cit. pp. 192, 210, 242.Google Scholar

25 Ludlow, and Jones, , op. cit. p. 3Google Scholar; they also excluded the agricultural labourer—ibid. pp. 4–5. The same distinction between the ‘working classes’ and ‘the poor’ appears in Chambers's Journal, XI (1840)—citedGoogle Scholar by Altick, R. D., op. cit. p. 337Google Scholar; and in the Quarterly Review (1863)—cited by Harrison, J. F. C., op. cit. pp. 6–7.Google Scholar

26 Cole, G. D. H., A Century of Co-operation (Manchester, 1945), pp. 9–10Google Scholar; Holyoake, G. J., The History of Co-operation, 2 vols. (London, 1906), I, p. 101.Google Scholar For the Unions, see, for example, Harriet Martineau to Henry Reeve, 14 Mar. 1859—quoted by Webb, R. K., Harriet Martineau (London, 1960), p. 352.Google Scholar On the Secularists, see Barker, J. to Garrison, Lloyd, printed in the Reasoner, XIX, 30 09. 1855, pp. 209–10.Google Scholar On Weitling and Bakunin, see Joll, James, The Anarchists (London, 1964), pp. 56–7.Google Scholar

27 Leyhe, John, Fifteenth Report of the Ministry to the Poor (Manchester, 1849), pp. 16–18.Google Scholar

28 Smiles, S., evidence to the S.C. on Public Libraries (1849), Q. 1981.Google Scholar On the original institute in Glasgow, see Kelly, , op. cit. pp. 244–5Google Scholar; and Curtis, , op. cit. p. 474.Google Scholar

29 Coates, pp. 19–20. His figure is 46 per cent of the total. But, according to the slightly more detailed Appendix III (pp. 96–103), in the five Yorkshire societies for which a breakdown of occupation is given, only 32 per cent of the members were mechanics. If this was so, then as the Y.U.M.I. expanded between 1840 and i860, there must have been a considerable increase in the numbers of mechanics involved, both relatively and absolutely. This would explain the differences between the Annual Reports for 1840 and 1859, quoted above.

30 Hudson, pp. 86–7.

31 Ibid. p. 131; see also his comments on p. vii.

32 Tylecote, , op. cit. app. III, p. 297Google Scholar; see also p. 139 and app. 11, p. 296.

33 Ibid. p. 230.

34 Bamford, S., Early Days (London, 1893), pp. 162–4.Google Scholar

35 Baines was quoting Hudson. I take the reference here from Ludlow and Jones, op. cit. p. 173.

36 Chadwick, D., On the Rate of Wages in Two Hundred Trades and Branches of Labour in Manchester … (1860)Google Scholar–quoted by Gillespie, F. E., Labor and Politics in England, 1850–1867 (Durham, N. Carolina, 1927), p. 197Google Scholar; Smiles, S., evidence to the S.C. on Public Libraries (1849). Q. 1981.Google Scholar

37 Kelly, T., op. cit. pp. 244–5.Google Scholar

38 Sixth Annual Report of the Y.U.M.I. (1843), quoted in Review, Westminster, loc. cit. pp. 429–30.Google Scholar

39 Hole, p. 18; Tylecote, , op. cit. pp. 75, 210, 229Google Scholar

40 Simon, B., op. cit. p. 158.Google Scholar

41 Hole, p. iv.

42 Tylecote, , op. cit. pp. 249–51, 254, 110.Google Scholar

43 Ibid. pp. 242, 112–13.

44 Williams, G. A., Rowland Detrosier … (York, 1965), p. 16.Google Scholar

45 Notes to the People, II, 584–8Google Scholar, quoted by Christensen, T., The Origin and History of Christian Socialism, 1848–1854 (Universitetsforlaget i Aarhus, 1962), p. 234.Google Scholar

46 Lovett, W., The Life and Struggles of William Lovett (London, 1876), pp. 319–21.Google Scholar For Holyoake's identity, see James Watson to Holyoake, 12 and 27 Feb. 1846; S. D. Collet to Holyoake, 17 Feb. 1846, Holyoake Papers, nos. 156, 159, 157, Co-operative Union, Manchester. For the West Bromwich and Handsworth Mechanics’ Institution, see below.

47 Harrison, J. F. C., op. cit. pp. 61–2Google Scholar; Tylecote, M., op. cit. p. 227.Google Scholar

48 Smith, W. Hawkes, op. cit. Analyst, II (06 1835), 333Google Scholar; ‘The Birmingham Mechanics’ Institution’, ibid. pp. 280–2.

49 Holyoake, G. J., Practical Grammar (1844) (8th ed., London, 1870), p. 7Google Scholar; see also his speech at the opening of the South London Oddfellows’ Literary Institution–Reasoner, IV, 5 Jan. 1848, p. 79.

50 Brierley, B., Failsworth: my native village … (Oldham, 1895), pp. 15–16Google Scholar; Movement, I, 30 10. 1844, p. 408Google Scholar and 18 Dec. 1844, p. 464.

51 Williams, G. A., op. cit. passim, esp. pp. 20–21.Google Scholar For another example of a working-class leader who, in traditional language, deserted ‘the cause’, see Harrison, B. and Hollis, P., ‘Chartism, Liberalism and the Life of Robert Lowery’, English Historical Review (July 1967), pp. 503–35.Google Scholar

52 Harrison, J. F. C., op. cit. p. 148.Google Scholar

53 Hudson, pp. 50–1; Holyoake, , The Last Trial for Alleged Atheism in England (London, 1851), pp. 6, 8Google Scholar; Kelly, T., op. cit. pp. 251–2Google Scholar; T. Coates, pp. 60–1.

54 Simon, B., op. cit. pp. 238–9.Google Scholar

58 Coates was writing during the peak of Socialist activity, which could explain why he is the most pessimistic of the writers on mechanics’ institutes–e.g. pp. 29–30.

56 Isaac Ironside to G. J. Holyoake, 5 Apr. 1841, Holyoake Papers, Letter Book, p. 31, Bishopsgate Institute, London.

57 J. Walter Newall to Holyoake, 15 July 1841, ibid. p. 33.

58 Harrison, J. F. C., op. cit. pp. 113–14Google Scholar; Reasoner, I, 29 07 1846, p. 136Google Scholar; ibid. 3 June 1846, p. 16; ibid. x, 30 Oct. 1850, p. 35; Utilitarian Record, 19 May 1847, p. 49Google Scholar; Reasoner, VII, 3 10. 1849, p. 223Google Scholar; G. S. Phillips to Holyoake, 12 Jan. 1854, Holyoake Papers, no. 631, Co-operative Union.

59 New Moral World (third series), I, 18 07 1840, p. 41.Google Scholar Professor Simon also uses this example, but draws a different conclusion–op. cit. p. 239; also Silver, H., op. cit. p. 223Google Scholar. One Socialist product of the Coventry Mechanics’ Institute was Dr John Watts (1818–87), the son of a weaver, assistant secretary and librarian at the institute, 1831–8. He then moved to Manchester, became an Owenite lecturer, and devoted the rest of his life to education and Co-operation–McCabe, J., A Biographical Dictionary of Modern Rationalists (London, 1920), s.v.Google Scholar

60 Cf. Cole, G. D. H., The Life of Robert Owen (3rd ed., London, 1965), pp. 253–4Google Scholar; also Traice, , op. cit. p. 11–though he hoped the political opinions thus produced would be moderate ones.Google Scholar

61 I do not know of a separate history of the Birmingham Mechanics’ Institution. This summary is taken from Buckley, J. K., Joseph Parses of Birmingham … (London, 1926), pp. 21–5.Google Scholar

62 T. Coates, app. III, pp. 96–7; Hudson, p. 63.

63 What follows is based largely on Holyoake's Log Book no. 1 in the Bishopsgate Institute. This book contains Holyoake's own extracts from diaries which he later destroyed.

64 Report of the Birmingham Mechanics’ Institute (1840), Birmingham Public Library, Birmingham Institutes, vol. C.I.

65 Hollick to Holyoake, 19 Jan. 1840, Holyoake Papers, Letter Book p. 13, Bishopsgate Institute, Holyoake to the Central Board (Owenites), 3 June 1841, ibid. p. 41.

66 Hollick to Holyoake, 12 Dec. 1839, ibid. p. 11; see also Holyoake to J. Toulmin Smith, 25 Mar. 1867, Holyoake Papers, no. 1728, Co-operative Union.

67 Hollick to Holyoake, 5 Feb. 1837, Holyoake Papers, Letter Book p. 3, Bishopsgate Institute.

68 Press cutting of the letter, in ibid. p. 5.

69 Holyoake to J. Walter Newall, 31 Aug. 1840, ibid. p. 18.