Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:52:22.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnic Identity, Demographic Crises and Xhosa-Khoikhoi Interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014

Robert Ross
Robert Ross*
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit, Leiden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Tribes no longer exist, at least in the writings of Africanists, but they tend to be replaced by very similar looking entities, going under a variety of aliases. Perhaps purely as a result of laziness of thought, there remains a tendency of write of the Zulu, the Tswana, or the whomever, and not to probe the assumption that these units have some actual existence. Nevertheless, like all working assumptions, this has to be continually re-examined. In this paper, therefore, I return to one of the classic problems in southern African history (in the broadest sense), namely that of the relationship between the Khoisan and the Bantu-speaking Africans. It has of course been widely studied, especially by linguists and physical anthropologists, and, to a lesser extent by archeologists. These disciplines show complementary results. Linguistics shows that many loan-words crossed from Khoisan to the Bantu languages - though not, apparently, in the reverse direction - and that this occurred to its greatest extent in the various Nguni languages of the south-east coastal belt. Physical anthropology has shown that the proportion of Khoisan genes in the Bantu speaking population increases from north to south. The archeological evidence is less clear. For eastern Zambia, Phillipson has argued that “the Early Iron Age folk and their late stone age neighbours… can be shown to have existed in several regions” and that “throughout the first millenium the two populations clearly to a large extent maintained their own separate identities”. This situation seems to have lasted until “four or five centuries ago.”

Type
Research Article
Information
History in Africa , Volume 7 , 1980 , pp. 259 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. On this see Westphal, E.O.J., “The Linguistic Prehistory of Southern Africa: Bush, Kwadi, Hottentot and Bantu Linguistic Relationships,” Africa, 33(1963), 237–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and the various works by Ehret, Christopher, notably “Agricultural History in Central and Southern Africa, ca. 1000 B.C. to A.D. 500”. Transafrican Journal of History, 4(1974).Google Scholar

2. Tobias, Philip, “The Biology of the Southern African Negro” in Hammond-Tooke, W. (ed.), The Bantu-Speaking Peoples of Southern Africa (London, 1974), 35.Google Scholar

3. Phillipson, D.W., “Population Movement and Interaction in African Prehistory: Some Examples From the Last Two Thousand Years in Eastern Zambia” in African Historial Demography, (Centre of African Studies, University of Edinburgh, 1977), 127.Google Scholar

4. Idem, The Later Prehistory of Eastern and Southern Africa (London, 1977), ch. 10.

5. See Derricourt, R.M., Prehistoric Man in the Ciskei and Transkei (Cape Town, 1977).Google Scholar

6. For recent accounts of this relationship see Wright, J.B., Bushman Raiders of the Drakensberg (Pietermaritzburg, 1971)Google Scholar and “San history and non-San historians” in Collected Seminar Papers on the Societies of Southern Africa in the 19th and 20th Centuries [Institute of Commonwealth Studies] 8(1977)Google Scholar; Silberbauer, G.B. and Kuper, A.J., “Kgalagari Masters of Bushmen Serfs; Some Observations”, African studies, 25(1966), 171–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Russell, Margot, “Slaves or Workers? Relations between Bushmen. Tswana and Boers in the Kalahari”, Journal of Southern African Studies, 2(1975/1976), 178–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. The advent of writing had two important effects, for the historian, in this connection. First, concrete detailed records provide far better information and secondly, traditions tend to become fixed and the progressive concealment of Khoi origins, which were generally held to be somewhat disreputable, was no longer possible.

8. Sparrman, Anders, A Voyage to the Cape of Good Hope… ed. Forbes, V.S., 2 vols.: (Cape Town, 1976–1977), 2:16.Google Scholar

9. Ibid, 2:13.

10. Molsbergen, E.C. Godée, Reizen in Zuid Afrika in Hollandse Tijd (4 vols.: Hague, 1916–1932), 4:61Google Scholar; Harinck, Gerrit, “Interaction Between Xhosa and Khoi, Emphasis on the Period 1620–1750” in African Societies in Southern Africa, ed. Thompson, Leonard M. (London, 1969), 159.Google Scholar

11. Elphick, Richard, Kraal and Castle: Khoikhoi and the Founding of White South Africa (New Haven, 1977), 229, 231Google Scholar; Molsbergen, Godée, Reizen, 3:292.Google Scholar

12. Ibid., 3:288.

13. Moodie, Donald, The Record… (reprinted, Amsterdam, 1960), 3:91Google Scholar

14. Gilliomee, H., “The Cape Eastern Frontier, 1770–1820” in The Shaping of South African Society, ed. Elphick, Richard and Gilliomee, H. (London, 1978).Google Scholar

15. Moodie, , Record, 5:9.Google Scholar

16. Soga, J.H., The South-Eastern Bantu, (Johannesburg, 1930), 117.Google Scholar The strictures on the use of this work expressed by J.B. Peires would not seem to apply in this case. See Peires, , “The Rise of the Right-hand House” in the History and Historiography of the Xhosa”, History in Africa, 2(1975), 113–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Cited in Soga, , South-Eastern Bantu, 118–19.Google Scholar I am informed by Professor J.A. Louw of UNISA that modern Gqunukhwebe tradition does not reject Khoi ancestry. See also Ngani, A.Z., Ibali Lamagqunukhwebe (Lovedale, 1947).Google Scholar

18. Moodie, , Record, 5:9.Google Scholar

19. Soga, , South-Eastern Bantu, 112Google Scholar and genealogy facing p. 81.

20. Boxer, C.R., The Tragic History of the Sea, 1589–1629 (Cambridge, 1959), 122.Google Scholar

21. Kuper, A.J., “The Structure of the Southern Bantu Kraal”, unpublished paper, 1978.Google Scholar

22. These ideas derive from Leach, Edmund R., Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure, (London, 1964).Google Scholar I have applied them to nineteenth-century southern Africa in my Adam Kok's Griquas, A Study in the Development of Stratification in South Africa (Cambridge, 1976), esp. 9–11.Google Scholar

23. Theal, G. McC., ed. Records of South-Eastern Africa, (8 vols.: Cape Town, 1898–1903), 8:204–05.Google Scholar

24. Wikar, H.J.et al, The Journal of Hendrik Jacob Wikar (1779)… and of Jacob Coetsé (1760) and Willem van Reenen (1791), ed. Mossop, E.E., (Cape Town, 1935), 125.Google Scholar

25. Bergh, Olof and Schrijver, Isaq, Journals of Olof Bergh and Isaq Schrijver, ed. Mossop, E.E., (Cape Town, 1931), 233.Google Scholar

26. Harinck, , “Interaction,” l64.Google Scholar

27. Sparrman, , Voyage, 2:123Google Scholar; Molsbergen, Godée, Reizen, 3:287–89.Google Scholar

28. Bergh, and Schrijver, , Journals, 233Google Scholar; Sparrman, , Voyage, 2:124.Google Scholar

29. See, e.g. the testimony of Galton, Francis in his Narrative of an Explorer in Tropical South Africa (London, 1853), 68–69.Google Scholar

30. Macfarlane, Alan, Resources and Population; a Study of Gurungs of Nepal (Cambridge, 1976).Google Scholar

31. Interesting, if not particularly exact, parallels can be drawn with the variations in political authority in the Pacific. See the classic article by Sahlins, Marshall, “Poor Man, Rich Man, Big Man, Chief: Political Types in Melanesia and Polynesia,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5(1962–1963), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32. Beinart, W., “Economic Change in Pondoland in the Nineteenth Century”, Collected Seminar Papers on the Societies of Southern Africa in the 19th and 20th Centuries [Institute of Commonwealth Studies] 7(1976), 27.Google Scholar

33. Harinck, , “Interaction,” 159.Google Scholar

34. Bertin, J.et al, Atlas of Food Crops, (Paris, 1971)Google Scholar; Wellington, J.H., Southern Africa, A Geographical Study, (2 vols.: (Cambridge, 1955), 1:242–43.Google Scholar

35. Maingard, L.F., “The Brikwa and the Ethnic Origins of the Batlhaping,” South African Journal of Science, 30(1930), 597–60Google Scholar

36. Vedder, H., “The Bergdama” in Hahn, C.H.L., Vedder, H. and Fourie, L., The Native Tribes of South-West Africa, (2d ed.: London, 1966), 37–39.Google Scholar

37. See e.g. Hall, Martin, “Ethnography, Environment and the History of the Nguni in the Eighteenth Centuries,” Collected Seminar Papers on the History of Southern Africa in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries [Institute of Commonwealth Studies] 8(1977) 16–19Google Scholar; Elphick, , Kraal and Castle, 23–43.Google Scholar

38. Hopkins, A.G., An Economic History of West Africa (London, 1973), 10.Google Scholar

39. The references are of course to Braudel, Fernand, La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l'époque de Philippe II (Paris, 1949).Google Scholar For an investigation of these approaches to time in precolonial Africa see Ross, Robert, “Van structuur tot evenement in de Afrikaanse geschiedenis,” Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis, 91(1978).Google Scholar