Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:49:07.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Plural Worlds of Educational Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Ellen Condliffe Lagemann
Ellen Condliffe Lagemann*
Affiliation:
Institute of Philosophy and Politics of Education at Teachers College, Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I have often argued to students, only in part to be perverse, that one cannot understand the history of education in the United States during the twentieth century unless one realizes that Edward L. Thorndike won and John Dewey lost. The statement is too simple, of course, but nevertheless more true than untrue and useful for several reasons. First, it suggests that, even if Thorndike and Dewey both spoke and wrote in the “progressive” idiom, the differences of view that separated them were large and significant. Beyond that, it calls attention to differences in the way each man's ideas were received. If Dewey has been revered among some educators and his thought has had influence across a greater range of scholarly domains—philosophy, sociology, politics, and social psychology, among them—Thorndike's thought has been more influential within education. It helped to shape public school practice as well as scholarship about education. Finally, the observation that Thorndike won and Dewey lost has value because it can open new questions about the Deweyan legacy, which, despite the many extant studies (some of which are excellent), remains richly suggestive and worthy of further exploration.

Type
Articles
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , Summer 1989 , pp. 185 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dewey, John, Leibniz's New Essays Concerning the Human Understanding. A Critical Exposition (1888), in John Dewey: The Early Works, 1882–1898, 5 vols. (Carbondale, Ill., 1969), 1: 255.Google Scholar

2 Dewey, John, “From Absolutism to Experimentalism,“ in Contemporary American Philosophy: Personal Statements, ed. Adams, George P. and Pepperell Montague, William (New York, 1930), 2: 22. See also Wirth, Arthur G., John Dewey as Educator: His Design for Work in Education, 1894–1904 (New York, 1966), preface.Google Scholar

3 Quoted in Max Eastman, “The Hero as Teacher: The Life Story of Dewey, John,” in Heroes I Have Known: Twelve Who Lived Great Lives (New York, 1942), 288.Google Scholar

4 Quoted in Coughlan, Neil, Young John Dewey: An Essay in American Intellectual History (Chicago, 1972), 92.Google Scholar

5 Quoted in ibid, 93.Google Scholar

6 Dewey, Jane M., “Biography of John Dewey,“ in The Philosophy of John Dewey, ed. Arthur Schilpp, Paul (La Salle, Ill., 1939), 21.Google Scholar

7 Quoted in Eastman, Heroes I Have Known, 300.Google Scholar

8 Coughlan, , Young John Dewey 96.Google Scholar

9 Quoted in Willinda Hortense Savage, “The Evolution of John Dewey's Philosophy of Experimentalism as Developed at the University of Michigan” (Ed.D. diss., University of Michigan, 1950), 64–65.Google Scholar

10 Royce, Josiah, “Present Ideals of American University Life,“ Scribner's Magazine 10 (Sept. 1891): 383.Google Scholar

11 Quoted in Savage, “John Dewey's Philosophy of Experimentalism as Developed at the University of Michigan,” 153.Google Scholar

12 Dykhuizen, George, “John Dewey and the University of Michigan,“ Journal of the History of Ideas 23 (Oct.–Dec. 1962): 522.Google Scholar

13 Herbert Mead, George, “The Philosophy of John Dewey,“ International Journal of Ethics 46 (Oct. 1935): 72.Google Scholar

14 Shorey, Paul, “The Spirit of the University of Chicago,“ as quoted in Darnell Rucker, The Chicago Pragmatists (Minneapolis, 1969), 27.Google Scholar

15 Diner, Steven J., A City and Its Universities: Public Policy in Chicago, 1892–1919 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1980), 17–18.Google Scholar

16 Herbert Palmer, George, Gould Schurman, Jacob, and Benjamin Andrews, E. had all refused offers from Harper, and Harper had been cautioned against making an offer to Charles S. Peirce, before, in search of new names, he accepted Dewey's name from Tufts. See George Dykhuizen, The Life and Mind of John Dewey (Carbondale, Ill., 1973), 77.Google Scholar

17 Memorandum, , Tufts, James H. to Rainey Harper, William, [late 1893 or early 1894], Presidents’ Papers, 1889–1925, Department of Special Collections, Joseph Regenstein Library, University of Chicago (hereafter cited as Presidents’ Papers).Google Scholar

18 Dewey, to Harper, , 19 Mar. 1894, Presidents’ Papers.Google Scholar

19 Tufts, James H., “Autobiographical Notes,“ ch. 3, p. 2, James H. Tufts Papers, Department of Special Collections, Joseph Regenstein Library (hereafter cited as Tufts Papers).Google Scholar

20 Dykhuizen, , The Life and Mind of John Dewey ch. 6.Google Scholar

21 Tufts, , “Autobiographical Notes,“ ch. 3, p. 2, Tufts Papers.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., pp. 1 and 4.Google Scholar

23 Herbert Mead, George, “The Philosophies of Royce, James, and Dewey in Their American Setting,“ International Journal of Ethics 40 (Jan. 1930): 231; and Dewey, John, “George Herbert Mead,” Journal of Philosophy 28 (4 June 1931): 310.Google Scholar

24 Herbert Mead, George to Castle Mead, Helen, 12 June 1901, George Herbert Mead Papers, Department of Special Collections, Joseph Regenstein Library.Google Scholar

25 “Author's Note,” The School and Society (1899) 2d ed. (1900) in John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924, ed. Ann Boydston, Jo, 15 vols. (Carbondale, Ill., 1976), 1: 3.Google Scholar

26 Dewey, Jane, “Biography of John Dewey,“ 26.Google Scholar

27 Bulmer, Martin, The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, Diversity, and the Rise of Sociological Research (Chicago, 1984), 35.Google Scholar

28 Small, Albion. W., “Some Demands of Sociology upon Pedagogy,“ American Journal of Sociology 1 (May 1897): 839–51, the quotes are oh pp. 842–43. Compatible views were expressed in Small, Albion W. and Vincent, George E., An Introduction to the Study of Society (New York, 1894), especially 262–64.Google Scholar

29 “A Note on the Texts,” in John Dewey: The Early Works, 5: cxxxiv; and “Pedagogy I B 19. Philosophy of Education. 1898–1899— Winter Quarter,” in ibid., 329.Google Scholar

30 Dewey cited George E. Vincent's The Social Mind and Education (New York, 1897) in his 1898–99 syllabus for Pedagogy I B 19; and one could argue that Vincent's book presented a view of education that was as close to the “Chicago view” at the time as Small's “Some Demands of Sociology upon Pedagogy” or Dewey's “My Pedagogic Creed.” The book is also a testimonial to the close collaboration that existed among scholars at Chicago. There were references to James H. Tufts and Dewey as well as to Francis Parker and his assistant, Jackman, W. S., who were not yet members of the Chicago faculty, although they were in touch with people who were.Google Scholar

31 Pauly, Philip J., Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology (New York, 1987), 68.Google Scholar

32 Dewey, Jane, “Biography of John Dewey,“ 30.Google Scholar

33 Charters Letter, W.W., 10 Apr. 1965, as quoted in Lectures in the Philosophy of Education: 1899 by John Dewey, ed. Archambault, Reginald D. (New York, 1966), xxxiv.Google Scholar

34 This is detailed in Jo Deegan, Mary, Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918 (New Brunswick, N.J., 1988).Google Scholar

35 Merriam's comment was quoted by another admirer of Addams's, Graham Taylor, in his autobiography, Pioneering on Social Frontiers (Chicago, 1930), 303.Google Scholar

36 The similarities between Addams and Dewey are noted and illustrated in Condliffe Lagemann, Ellen, ed., Jane Addams on Education Classics in Education, no. 51 (New York, 1985).Google Scholar

37 John Dewey to Mrs. [James H.] Tufts, 8 Dec. n.y., Tufts Papers.Google Scholar

38 Eastman, , Heroes I Have Known 299.Google Scholar

39 Ibid.Google Scholar

40 “The University Elementary School. History and Character,” University Record 2 (21 May 1897): 75.Google Scholar

41 Not coincidentally, Dewey noted in the Preface to How We Think that “Our schools are troubled with multiplication of studies…. Our teachers find their tasks made heavier in that they have come to deal with pupils individually and not merely in mass…. Some clue of unity, some principle that makes for simplification must be found. This book represents the conviction that the needed steadying and centralizing factor is found in adopting as the end of endeavor that attitude of mind, that habit of thought, which we call scientific,” in John Dewey: The Middle Works, 6: 179.Google Scholar

42 Dewey, John, “The University School,“ 31 Oct. 1896, in John Dewey: The Early Works, 5: 436–37.Google Scholar

43 Dewey, John, “The Need for a Laboratory School. Statement to President William Rainey Harper, n.d. [1896?]“ in John Dewey: The Early Works, 5: 434.Google Scholar

44 Dewey, John, “Pedagogy as a University Discipline [Sept. 1896]“ in John Dewey: The Early Works, 5: 289.Google Scholar

45 Dewey, John, “Introduction,“ Camp Mayhew, Katherine and Camp Edwards, Ann, The Dewey School: The Laboratory School of the University of Chicago, 1896–1903 (New York, 1936), xv.Google Scholar

46 Dewey, John, “Results of Child-Study Applied to Education,“ in John Dewey: The Early Works, 5: 204.Google Scholar

47 The Child and the Curriculum (1902), in John Dewey: The Early Works, 2: 277–78, is also relevant to Dewey's concern for finding through research a balance between child-centeredness and a total lack of adult guidance.Google Scholar

48 Dewey, John, “The Primary-Education Fetich [May 1898]“ in John Dewey: The Early Works, 5: 255.Google Scholar

49 Dewey, John, “My Pedagogic Creed,“ School Journal 54 (Jan. 1897), in John Dewey: The Early Works, 5: 93; and The School and Society (1899), in John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1: 18.Google Scholar

50 The School and Society, in John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1: 19–20.Google Scholar

51 Ibid.Google Scholar

52 Ibid., 44.Google Scholar

53 Mayhew, and Edwards, , The Dewey School 10.Google Scholar

54 Dewey, Jane, “Biography of John Dewey,“ 29; and Ann Boydston, Jo, “John Dewey and the New Feminism,“ Teachers College Record 76 (Feb. 1975): 441–48. See also Flagg Young, Ella, Some Types of Modern Educational Theory, Chicago Contributions to Education, no. 6 (Chicago, 1909), ch. 5 for Young's interpretation of Dewey's conception of educational inquiry.Google Scholar

55 Dewey to Harper, 6 Dec. 1897, Presidents’ Papers.Google Scholar

56 Dewey, John, “The Theory of the Chicago Experiment,“ in Mayhew and Edwards, The Dewey School, 476; and How We Think, in John Dewey: The Middle Works, 6: 179.Google Scholar

57 Eastman, , Heroes I Have Known 306–307.Google Scholar

58 Rugg, Harold, Foundations for American Education (Yonkers-on-Hudson, 1947), 555–56.Google Scholar

59 Dewey, John, “The Primary-Education Fetich [May 1898] “ in John Dewey: The Early Works, 5: 269.Google Scholar

60 Judd, Charles H., “Studies in Principles of Education,“ Elementary School Teacher 13 (Nov. 1912): 152.Google Scholar

61 Judd, C. H. to Counts, George S., 23 June 1930, Charles Hubbard Judd Papers, Department of Special Collections, Joseph Regenstein Library. Hereafter Judd Papers.Google Scholar

62 Counts, George S., “A Humble Autobiography,“ in Leaders in American Education. The Seventieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part 2 (1971), ed. Havinghurst, Robert J., 158–59.Google Scholar

63 Hubbard Judd, Charles, Introduction to the Scientific Study of Education (Boston, 1918), iii.Google Scholar

64 Franklin Bobbitt, John, “The Supervision of City Schools: Some General Principles of Management Applied to the Problems of City School Systems,“ in Twelfth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part 1 (1913), 7–8.Google Scholar

65 For a detailed discussion see Thomas White, Woodie, “The Study of Education at the University of Chicago, 1892–1958“ (Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago, 1977); also Wechsier, Harold, “The Primary Journal of Secondary Education, 1893–1938: Part I of a History of School Review“ American Journal of Education 88 (Nov. 1979): 83–106, and “From Practice to Theory: A History of School Review, Part II,” American Journal of Education 88 (Feb. 1980): 216–44.Google Scholar

66 White, “The Study of Education at the University of Chicago,” 160–65.Google Scholar

67 Rugg, Harold, That Men May Understand: An American in the Long Armistice (New York, 1941), 306. It is interesting to note in this regard that by 1942 Dewey's legacy had virtually been erased from the University of Chicago's “institutional memory.” According to a symposium held in that year, “the impact of scientific method on educational research began to be felt seriously during the decade from 1905 and 1915.” McConnell, T. R., Scates, Douglas E., and Freeman, Frank N., The Conceptual Structure of Educational Research: A Symposium Held in Connection with the Fiftieth Anniversary Celebration of the University of Chicago (Chicago, 1942), preface.Google Scholar

68 Parker, Samuel, General Methods of Teaching in Elementary School (Boston, 1919), 265.Google Scholar

69 White, “The Study of Education at the University of Chicago,” 139.Google Scholar

70 Haskell, Thomas L., “Professionalism versus Capitalism: R. H. Tawney, Emile Durkheim, and C. S. Peirce on the Disinterestedness of Professional Communities “ in The Authority of Experts: Studies in History and Theory, ed. Haskell, Thomas L. (Bloomington, Ind., 1984), 180–225.Google Scholar

71 Willey, Malcolm M. to Will[iam F. Ogburn], n.d. [June 1931], Judd Papers.Google Scholar

72 Lynd, Robert to Judd, C. H., 4 Mar. 1931, and Judd, C. H. to Lynd, Robert, 6 Mar. 1931, Judd Papers. The basis for Lynd's criticism is explained in Smith, Mark C., “Robert Lynd and Consumerism in the 1930's,“ Journal of the History of Sociology 2 (Fall–Winter 1979–80): 99–119.Google Scholar

73 Coffman, L. D. to Judd, Charles H., 26 July 1930, Judd Papers.Google Scholar

74 Judd, Charles H., Problems of Education in the United States (New York, 1933).Google Scholar

75 Buckingham, R. R., “Our First Twenty-Five Years,“ NEA Proceedings (1941), 347 and 348.Google Scholar

76 The continued dominance of “a positivistic approach” to educational research as well as recent calls “to transcend the limits of positivism” are noted in Evelyn Jacob, “Clarifying Qualitative Research: A Focus on Traditions,” Educational Researcher 17 (Jan.–Feb. 1988): 16.Google Scholar

77 Although neither article deals with Judd, see Church, Robert L., “Educational Psychology and Social Reform in the Progressive Era,“ History of Education Quarterly 11 (Winter 1971): 390–405, and Karier, Clarence J., “Elite Views on American Education,” in Education and Social Structure in the Twentieth Century, ed. Laqueur, Walter and Mosse, George L. (New York, 1967), 149–63, for other arguments concerning Thorndike's influence and Dewey's relative lack of influence.Google ScholarPubMed

78 Jonçich, Geraldine, The Sane Positivist: A Biography of Edward L. Thorndike (Middletown, Conn., 1968), 449–50.Google Scholar

79 Cremin, Lawrence A., American Education: The Metropolitan Experience, 1876–1980 (New York, 1988), 189–91.Google Scholar

80 Rucker, , The Chicago Pragmatists 132–42; cf. David Lewis, J. and Smith, Richard L., American Sociology and Pragmatism: Mead, Chicago Sociology, and Symbolic Interactionism (Chicago, 1980).Google Scholar

81 Dollard, John, “Yale's Institute of Human Relations: What Was It?“ Ventures 3 (Winter 1964): 32–40.Google Scholar