Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
The early American colleges were smaller and poorer counterparts of the universities of Great Britain, rather than indigenous institutions, and the mother country was the source of their curriculum. At Cambridge University, which became the intellectual center of the Puritan movement, the curriculum of studies had evolved from the medieval trivium (grammar, rhetoric, logic) and quadrivium (arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, music) and from the three philosophies (natural, moral, mental). But interest in mathematics had dwindled by 1700, and the study of classical authors was revived. The universities were still governed by the Elizabethan statutes of 1561, which required that each student be proficient in rhetoric, logic, and philosophy, and that they be tested in these subjects by public disputations before being admitted to a degree. Beyond these requirements, the subjects to be studied were determined by a tutor, who was responsible for the four or five students assigned to him.
1. Costello, William T., The Scholastic Curriculum at Early Seventeenth-Century Cambridge (Cambridge, Mass., 1948), 42–43; S. E. Morison, The Founding of Harvard College (Cambridge, Mass., 1935), 62–72.Google Scholar
2. Morison, S. E., Harvard College in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge, Mass.), 139–284.Google Scholar
3. Dexter, Franklin B., ed., Documentary History of Yale College (New Haven, 1916), 32–33.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, Thomas H., “Jonathan Edwards' Background of Reading,” Colonial Society of Massachusetts, Publications, XXVIII (1935), 193–222.Google Scholar
5. Dexter, Franklin B., ed., Biographical Sketches of the Graduates of Yale College with Annals of the College (New York, 1885), II, 5–6.Google Scholar
6. Broderick, Francis L., “Pulpit, Physics, and Politics: the Curriculum of the College of New Jersey, 1746–1794,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd Ser., VI (1949), 42–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Snow, Louis F., The College Curriculum in the United States (New York, 1951), 39.Google Scholar
8. Cheyney, E. P., History of the University of Pennsylvania, 1740–1940 (Pittsburgh, 1940), 82.Google Scholar
9. Smith, William, Account of the College, Academy, and Charitable School of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, 1951), 22–23.Google Scholar
10. Van Amringe, J. H. and others, A History of Columbia University 1754–1904 (New York, 1904), 448–51.Google Scholar
11. Tyler, Lyon G., “Early Courses and Professors at William and Mary College,” William and Mary College Quarterly, 1st Ser., XIV (1905), 72.Google Scholar
12. Meriwether, Colyer, Our Colonial Curriculum, 1607–1776 (Washington, 1907), 238–47; David Potter, Debating in the Colonial Chartered Colleges (New York, 1944), 125–45.Google Scholar
13. Castenado, C. E., Modern Language Instruction in American Colleges, 1779–1800 (Washington, 1925), 4.Google Scholar
14. Norton, Arthur O., “Harvard Text-books and Reference Books of the Seventeenth Century,” Colonial Society of Massachusetts, Publications, XXVIII (1935), 361–438; G. Stanley Hall, “On the History of American College Textbooks and Teaching in Logic, Ethics, Psychology, and Allied Subjects,” American Antiquarian Society, Proceedings, IX (1894), 137–74.Google Scholar
15. Hornberger, Theodore, Scientific Thought in the American Colleges, 1638–1800 (Austin, 1945), 22–34.Google Scholar
16. Cohen, I. B., Some Early Tools of American Science (Cambridge, Mass., 1950), 66–70.Google Scholar
17. Haddow, Anna, Political Science in American Colleges and Universities, 1636–1900 (New York, 1939), 14.Google Scholar