Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:21:26.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond the Abortion Wars: A Way Forward for a New Generation. Author's Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2017

Charles C. Camosy
Charles C. Camosy*
Affiliation:
Fordham University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium
Information
Horizons , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , June 2017 , pp. 170 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © College Theology Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

23 Camosy, Charles C., “Intellectual Solidarity and Transcending Polarized Discourse,” Journal of Political Theology 15, no. 1 (2014): 40–52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Unless indicated otherwise, this and other quotations from Colb are from her review above (section IV).

25 Savulescu, Julian, “Abortion, Infanticide, and Allowing Babies to Die, Forty Years On,” Journal of Medical Ethics 39, no. 5 (2013): 257–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Colb, Sherry F. and Dorf, Michael C., Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights (New York: Columbia University Press, 2016)Google Scholar.

27 See Camosy, Charles C., Peter Singer and Christian Ethics: Beyond Polarization (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 83–136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 For a fascinating example from Islamic tradition, see McGregor, Richard, The Case of Animals versus Man before the King of Jinn: An English Translation of Epistle 22 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar.

29 Camosy, Charles C., “Other Animals as Persons? A Roman Catholic Inquiry,” in Animals as Religious Subjects: Transdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. Deane-Drummond, Celia et al. . (New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2013)Google Scholar.

30 See, for instance, Traina, Cristina L. H., Feminist Ethics and Natural Law: The End of the Anathemas (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Porter, Jean, Nature as Reason: A Thomistic Theory of Natural Law (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004)Google Scholar; and Cahill, Lisa Sowle, Theological Bioethics: Participation, Justice, and Change (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

31 “Europe's Abortion Rules,” BBC News, February 12, 2007, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6235557.stm.

32 “Country Comparison: Maternal Mortality Rate,” CIA World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2223rank.html.

33 Elard Koch et al., “Women's Education Level, Maternal Health Facilities, Abortion Legislation, and Maternal Deaths: A Natural Experiment in Chile from 1957 to 2007,” PLOS ONE, May 4, 2012, http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036613.

34 Unless indicated otherwise, this and other quotations from Traina are from her review above (section I).

35 See Lysaught's review above (section III).

36 Konieczny, Mary Ellen, Camosy, Charles C., and Bruce, Tricia C., eds., Polarization in the US Catholic Church: Naming the Wounds, Beginning to Heal (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2016)Google Scholar.

37 Charles C. Camosy, “Matthew Dowd: ‘We Need to Create a New Political Movement of Independents,’” Crux, November 28, 2016, https://cruxnow.com/interviews/2016/11/28/matthew-dowd-need-create-new-political-movement-independents/.

38 Inés San Martín, “Pope Francis: Media Should Avoid Indulging Popular Love of Smut,” Crux, December 7, 2016, https://cruxnow.com/vatican/2016/12/07/pope-francis-media-avoid-indulging-popular-love-smut/.