Article contents
Feminist Epistemology at Hypatia's 25th Anniversary1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2020
Abstract
This essay surveys twenty-five years of feminist epistemology in the pages of Hypatia. Feminist contributions have addressed the affective dimensions of knowledge; the natures of justification, rationality, and the cognitive agent; and the nature of truth. They reflect thinking from both analytic and continental philosophical traditions and offer a rich tapestry of ideas from which to continue challenging tradition and forging analytical tools for the problems ahead.
- Type
- Invited Papers
- Information
- Hypatia , Volume 25 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Feminist Legacies/Feminist Futures: The 25th Anniversary Issue , Summer 2010 , pp. 733 - 741
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2010 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Alcoff, Linda, and Potter, Elizabeth, eds. 1996. Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2004. Uses of value judgments in feminist social science: A case study of research on divorce. Hypatia 19 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antony, Louise, and Witt, Charlotte, eds. 19932002. A mind of one's own. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1987. The flight to objectivity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Braaten, Jane. 1990. Towards a reassessment of intellectual virtue. Hypatia 5 (3): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1993. Embodiment, sexual difference, and the nomadic subject. Hypatia 8 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clough, Sharyn. 2004. Having it all: Naturalized normativity in feminist science studies. Hypatia 19 (1): 102–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1987. Epistemic responsibility. Hanover, N.H.: University of New England Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1998. How to think globally: Stretching the limits of imagination. Hypatia 13 (2): 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasswick, Heidi. 2004. Individuals‐in‐communities: The search for a feminist model of epistemic subjects. Hypatia 19 (3): 85–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2009. Panel presentation. Founders on rationality, science, and epistemic humility. Feminist Legacies/Feminist Futures: Hypatia 25th Anniversary Conference. University of Washington. October 22–24, http://www.wiley.com/go/Hypatia‐podcasts (accessed June 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 2009. Founders on rationality, science, and epistemic humility. Feminist Legacies/Feminist Futures: Hypatia 25th Anniversary Conference. University of Washington. October 22–24, http://www.wiley.com/go/Hypatia‐podcasts (accessed June 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Holler, Linda. 1990. Thinking with the weight of the earth: Feminist contributions to an epistemology of concreteness. Hypatia 5 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1987. Le sujet de science: Est‐il sexué?/Is the subject of science sexed? Hypatia 2 (3): 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Alison, and Bordo, Susan, eds. 1989. Gender/body/knowledge. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in western philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, Maria. 1987. Playfulness, “world”‐travelling, and loving perception. Hypatia 2 (2): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugones, Maria, and Spelman, Elizabeth. 1983. Have we got a theory for you! Women's Studies International Forum 6 (6): 573–81. Reprinted in Hypatia Reborn: Essays in Feminist Philosophy, ed. Azizah al‐Hibri and Margaret Simons. 1990. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn. 1995. The very idea of feminist epistemology. Hypatia 10 (3): 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksala, Johanna. 2004. Anarchic bodies: Foucault and the feminist question of experience. Hypatia 19 (4): 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis. 1991. Gendered reason: Sex metaphor and conceptions of reason. Hypatia 6 (2): 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis. 2003. Feminist pragmatist revisionings of reason, knowledge, and philosophy. Hypatia 18 (2): 15–37.Google Scholar
Ruetsche, Laura. 2004. Virtue and contingent history: Possibilities for feminist epistemology. Hypatia 19 (1): 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1993. Though this be method, yet there is madness in it: Liberal epistemology and paranoia. In A mind of one's own, ed. Antony, Louise and Witt, Charlottoe. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 2001. Epistemology resuscitated: Objectivity as trustworthiness. In Engendering rationalities, ed. Tuana, Nancy and Morgan, Sandra. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan. 1991. The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry 17 (4): 773–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone‐Mediatore, Sharon. 1998. Chandra Mohanty and the re‐valuing of experience. Hypatia 13 (2): 116–33.Google Scholar
Tuana, Nancy, and Morgan, Sandra, eds. 2001. Engendering rationalities. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Tuana, Nancy, and Sullivan, Shannon, eds. 2007. Race and epistemologies of ignorance. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- 16
- Cited by