Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:48:20.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interval, Sexual Difference: Luce Irigaray and Henri Bergson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Rebecca Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Henri Bergson's philosophy has attracted increasing feminist attention in recent years as a fruitful locus for re-theorizing temporality. Drawing on Luce Irigaray's well-known critical description of metaphysics as phallocentrism, Hill argues that Bergson's deduction of duration is predicated upon the disavowal of a sexed hierarchy. She concludes the article by proposing a way to move beyond Bergson's phallocentrism to articulate duration as a sensible and transcendental difference that articulates a nonhierarchical qualitative relation between the sexes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 119 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, . 1984. The complete works of Aristotle. Ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Volume 1. Rev. Trans. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1889/1913. Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness. Trans. Pogson, F. L.London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1896/1981. Matter and memory. Trans. Paul, Nancy Margaret and Scott Palmer, W.New York: Zone.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1807/1983. Creative evolution. Trans. Mitchell, Arthur. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1919/1920. Mind‐energy. Trans. Wildon Carr, H.New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1932/1977. Two sources of morality and religion. Trans. Ashley Audra, R. and Brereton, Cloudsley. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1933/1992. The creative mind: An introduction to metaphysics. Trans. Andison, Mabelle L.New York: Citadel.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1959. Oeuvres. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Breeur, Roland. 2001. Bergson and Sartre's account of the self in relation to the transcendental ego. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (2): 177–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1966/1991. Bergsonism. Trans. Tomlinson, Hugh and Habberjam, Barbara. New York: Zone.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2004. The nick of time: Politics, evolution, and the untimely. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Rebecca. 2006. Interval, sexual difference: Irigaray, Aristotle, and Bergson. Ph.D. diss., Monash University.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985a. Speculum of the other woman. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. This sex which is not one. Trans. Porter, Catherine and Burke, Carolyn. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1991. The Irigaray reader. Ed. Whitford, Margaret. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in Western philosophy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Olkowski, Dorothea. 1999. Gilles Deleuze and the ruin of representation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Olkowski, Dorothea. 2000. The end of phenomenology: Bergson's interval in Irigaray. Hypatia 15 (2): 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar