Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:42:22.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Before You Formed in the Womb I Knew You”: Sex Selection and Spaces of Ambiguity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Anna Mudde
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The spaces provided by biotechnologies of sex selection are rich with epistemological, ontological, and ethical considerations that speak to broadly held social values and epistemic frameworks. In much of the discourse about sex selection that is not medically indicated, the figure of the “naturally” conceived (future) child is treated as a problem for parents who want to select the sex of their child. As unknown, that child is ambiguous in terms of sex—“it” is both and neither, and might be the “wrong” sex. Drawing on Beauvoirean thinking about ambiguity and desire, I cast part of the desire to select the sex of a child as bound to an ethic and epistemology of disambiguation, and urge that the space of being-unknown is one to which each person is entitled.

Type
FEMINIST BIOTECHNOLOGIES CLUSTER
Information
Hypatia , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , Summer 2010 , pp. 553 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Assisted Human Reproduction Act (Bill C‐6), S.C. 2004. c.2, online: Canadian Library of Parliament 〈http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Sites/LOP/LEGISINFO/〉Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1948/1976. The ethics of ambiguity, Trans. Bernard Frechtman. New York: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2004a. A review of The Phenomenology of Perception by Maurice Merleau‐Ponty. In Philosophical writings, ed. Simons, Margaret A., Trans. Marybeth Timmermann. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2004b. Pyrrhus and Cineas. In Philosophical writings, ed. Simons, Margaret A., Trans. Marybeth Timmermann. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, J.M. 2000. Two boys and a girl please and hold the mustard. Public Health 114:5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, Jonathan M., and Snyder, Jack W. 1998. Racism and sexism in medically assisted conception. Bioethics 12 (1): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordo, Susan. 1987. The flight to objectivity: Essays in Cartesianism and culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 1997. Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/164.htm (accessed March 10, 2010).Google Scholar
Davis, D.L., Gottlieb, M.B., and Stampnitzky, J.R. 1998. Reduced rate of male to female births in several industrialized countries: A sentinel health indicator? Journal of the American Medical Association 279 (13): 1018–23.Google Scholar
Dickens, B.M. 2002. Can sex‐selection be ethically tolerated? Journal of Medical Ethics 28:335–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. 1999. Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility 72(4):595–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. 2001. Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertility and Sterility 75(5):861–64.Google Scholar
Everett, Jana. 1998. Indian feminists debate the efficacy of policy reform: The Maharashtra ban on sex‐determination tests. Social Politics 5(3):314–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fathalla, M.F. 2000. The girl child. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 70:7–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatens, Moira. 1991. Feminism and philosophy: Perspectives on difference and equality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grazi, Richard V., Wolowelsky, Joel B., and Kreiger, David J. 2008. Sex selection by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for nonmedical reasons in contemporary Israeli regulations. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (3): 293–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, A.S., and Bailey, J.M. 2001. Parental selection of children's sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behaviour 30 (4): 423–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalaça, Cagri, and Akin, Ayse. 1995. The issue of sex selection in Turkey. Human Reproduction 10 (7): 1631–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klasen, Stephan. 1994. Missing women reconsidered. World Development 22:1061–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, P., and Rose, G.A. 1996. Ethics of sex‐selection: The right way forward. Human Reproduction 11 (11): 2343–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1993. The man of reason: ‘Male’ and ‘female’ in western philosophy. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDougall, J., DeWit, D.J., and Ebanks, G.E. 1999. Parental preferences for sex of children in Canada. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 41 (7–8): 615–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overall, Christine. 1987. Ethics and human reproduction: A feminist analysis. Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Pennings, Guido. 1996. Ethics of sex selection for family balancing. Human Reproduction 11 (11): 2339–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powledge, T.M. 1983. Toward a moral policy for sex choice. In Sex selection of children, ed. Bennet, N.G.New York: Academic Press, pp. 201–12.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies in Canada. 1993. Proceed with care: Final report of the Royal Commission. Ottawa: Minister of Government Services.Google Scholar
Savulescu, Julian. 1999. Sex selection: The case for. Medical Journal of Australia 171:373–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scully, J.L., Banks, S., and Shakespeare, T.W. 2006. Chance, choice and control: Lay debate on prenatal social sex selection. Social Science and Medicine 63 (1): 21–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, Amartya. 1992. Missing women. British Medical Journal 304:586–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, Amartya. 2003. Missing women—revisited: Reduction in female mortality has been counterbalanced by sex selective abortion. British Medical Journal 327 (7427): 1297–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statham, H., Green, J., Snowdon, C., and France‐Dawson, M. 1993. Choice of baby's sex. Lancet 341 (8844): 564–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, Mary Anne. 1987. A reply to Holmes on gendercide. Bioethics 1 (2): 189–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, Robert. 1991. The ethics of selecting for fetal sex. Bailliere's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 5 (3): 575–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed