Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T03:26:24.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Revolt: A Horizon for Feminist Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

J. Ralph Lindgren
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The suggestion here is that casting the project of feminist ethics in confrontational language, rooted in a rebellion picture of moral epistemology, impedes the further development of that very project. Four commonplace examples are offered to make this suggestion plausible. I urge instead a pluralistic approach to styles of moral thinking and propose that the project of feminist ethics would be better served by casting it in the language of reconciliation.

Type
Comment/Reply
Information
Hypatia , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 1990 , pp. 145 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baier, Annette. 1987. The need for more than justice. In Science, morality and moral theory. See Hanen and Nielsen.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyta. 1987. The generalized and the concrete other. In Women and moral theory. See Kittay and Meyers.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1987. Second persons. In Science, morality & feminist theory. See Hanen and Nielsen.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1987. Beyond caring: the de‐moralization of gender. In Science, morality & feminist theory. See Hanen and Nielsen.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1987. Moral orientation and moral development. In Women and moral theory. See Kittay and Meyers.Google Scholar
Hanen, Marsha and Nielsen, Kai. 1987. Science, morality & feminist theory. Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1987. The curious coincidence of feminine and African moralities: Challenges for feminist theory. In Women and moral theory. See Kittay and Meyers.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1987. Feminism and moral theory. In Women and moral theory. See Kittay and Meyers.Google Scholar
Houston, Barbara. 1987. Rescuing womanly virtues: Some dangers of moral reclamation. In Science, morality & feminist theory. See Hanen and Nielsen.10.1080/00455091.1987.10715937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T. 1987. Women and moral theory. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana. 1987. The socialized individual and individual autonomy: An intersection between philosophy and psychology. In Women and moral theory. See Kittay and Meyers.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A/emmme approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller, 1989. Reason and feeling in thinking about justice. Ethics 99 (2): 229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, Michael. 1987. Duty and friendship: Toward a synthesis of Gilligan's contrastive moral concepts. In Women and moral theory. See Kittay and Meyers.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1989. Moral understandings: Alternative “epistemology” for a feminist ethics. Hypatia 4 (2): 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar