Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dkgms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T13:57:53.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution. Elisabeth Lloyd. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2005.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Letitia Meynell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Hypatia , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , Summer 2007 , pp. 218 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Elizabeth. 1995. Knowledge, human interests, and objectivity in feminist epistemology. Philosophical Topics 23 (2): 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barash, David. 2005. Let a thousand orgasms bloom. Review of The case of the female orgasm, by Elisabeth Lloyd. Evolutionary Psychology 3: 347–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1993. Subjects, power, and knowledge: Description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science. In Feminist epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, Linda and Potter, Elizabeth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton. N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, Donald. 1979. The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar