Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:25:31.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emancipation as a Three‐Dimensional Process for the Twenty‐First Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

This article elicits two overlapping frameworks in which emancipation has been understood and applied to women. The first distinguishes between a) an original definition grounded in Roman Law and defined as release from slavery and b) an Enlightenment sense in which an emancipatory process is associated with a critical ethos. I derive this latter meaning from an analysis of Kant's and Foucault's respective essays on enlightenment. Although they agree that emancipation is an ongoing critical task, I emphasize two aspects of Foucault's version: his attention to practices of liberty that entail bodily as well as subjective reconstruction and his inclusion, among topics for critique, of modernity's ontology of the human subject. In the case of women's emancipation, I argue that both aspects of emancipation must proceed simultaneously because of the distinctive nature of their oppression. For second‐wave feminism, I note a continued, although reoriented, equation between women and slaves. But now I identify a further framework whereby emancipation emerges as a threefold although systemic undertaking in which legal, subjectivist, and economic dimensions are at stake. I argue in conclusion that each entails unfinished emancipatory projects that represent timely ways to revive emancipation in the twenty‐first century.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, Michèle. 1980. Women's oppression today: Problems in Marxist feminist analysis. London: Verso.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1949/1972. The second sex. Trans. H. M. Parshley. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant matter. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, Diana. 2013. Agentic capacities and capacious historical materialism: Thinking with new materialisms in the political sciences. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (3): 451–69.Google Scholar
Coole, Diana, and Frost, Samantha, eds. 2010. The new materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Angela. 1982. Women, race and class. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1982. The subject and power. In Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, ed. Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. What is enlightenment? In The Foucault reader, ed. Rabinow, Paul. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1987. The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984. Conducted by Raúl Fornet‐Betancourt, Helmut Becker, and Alfredo Gomez‐Müller. Trans. Gauthier, J. D. Philosophy and Social Criticism 12 (2–3): 112–31.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2011. The courage of truth: Lectures at the Collège de France 1983–1984. Trans. Graham Burchell. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Fortunes of feminism. From state‐managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1986. What is wrong with slavery? In Applied ethics, ed. Singer, Peter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1784/1991. An answer to the question: “What is enlightenment?” In Kant: Political writings, ed. Reiss, H. S. Trans. H. B. Nesbit. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1869/1991. The subjection of women. In John Stuart Mill: On liberty and other essays, ed. Gray, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Juliet. 1971. Woman's estate. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar