Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:52:30.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender and Coloniality: From Low-Intensity Communal Patriarchy to High-Intensity Colonial-Modern Patriarchy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2021

Rita Laura Segato  and
Pedro Monque
Rita Laura Segato
Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus, Graduate Program in Bioethics, University of Brasília, Campus Universitário, Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, 70.910-000, Brasília - DF, Brazil and Chair of the Cátedra Rita Segato de Pensamiento Incómodo, Programa Lectura Mundi, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, Campus Miguelete, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Pedro Monque*
Affiliation:
Translated by Pedro Monque, Philosophy Program, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY10016, USA
*
Corresponding author. monque.pedro@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay collects four decades of my own reflections, as an anthropologist and feminist, on gender and coloniality across various contexts in Latin America. It also highlights the decolonial methodology and vocabulary that I have had to develop in my various roles as scholar, public intellectual, and expert witness over the years. Briefly, what I present here is a decolonial feminist perspective that argues for the existence of a patriarchal political order in communal societies before colonization. Yet, in my view, precolonial gender has a dual structure that is plural in essence and differs markedly from the binary gender structure of colonial-modern societies, which works in terms of a One and its marginalized others. As I argue, the capturing and transformation of precolonial dual gender structures by the modern gender system exacerbates inequality, increases violence against women, and disempowers them politically. For that reason, I speak of “low-intensity” and “high-intensity” patriarchal systems.

Type
Translation
Information
Hypatia , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , Fall 2021 , pp. 781 - 799
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, Lila, ed. 1998. Remaking women: Feminism and modernity in the Middle East. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400831203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An-Na'im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 1995. Toward a cross cultural approach to defining international standards of human rights: The meaning of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. In Human rights in cross-cultural perspectives: A quest for consensus, ed. An-Na'im, Abdullahi Ahmed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Assis Clímaco, Danilo de. 2009. Tráfico de mulheres, negócios de homens: Leituras feministas e anti-coloniais sobre os homens, as masculinidades e/ou o masculino. Master's thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cal y Mayor, Araceli Burguete. 2002. Ciudadanas en la etnicidad: Campos del proceso de ciudadanización de las mujeres indígenas en los altos de Chiapas: Desafíos y oportunidades. Anuario del Centro de Estudios Superiores de Mexico and Centro America. Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas, Centro de Estudios Superiores de México y Centroamérica.Google Scholar
Campuzano, Giuseppe. 2006. Reclaiming travesti histories. IDS Bulletin 37 (5): 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campuzano, Giuseppe. 2009. Contemporary travesti encounters with gender and sexuality in Latin America. Development 52 (1): 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carcedo, Ana, ed. 2010. No olvidamos ni aceptamos: Feminicidio en Centroamérica 2000–2006. San José de Costa Rica: Asociación Centro Feminista de Información y Acción (CEFEMINA).Google Scholar
Castro-Gómez, Santiago. 2005. La hybris del punto cero: Ciencia, raza e ilustración en la Nueva Granada 1750–1816. Bogotá: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.Google Scholar
Clastres, Pierre. 1969. The bow and the basket. Social Science Information 8 (3): 145–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1998. At the heart of freedom: Feminism, sex, and equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400822553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, Arlette. 2005. Mujeres y colonialismo. In El libro negro del colonialismo: Siglos XVI al XXI: Del exterminio al arrepentimiento, ed. Ferro, Marc. Madrid: La Esfera de los Libros.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, Margarita, and Palomo, Nellys. 1999. Autonomía con mirada de mujer. In MÉXICO: Experiencias de autonomía indígena. Guatemala: International Working Group on Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA).Google Scholar
Hernández, Rosalva Aída, and Sierra, Maria Teresa. 2005. Repensar los derechos colectivos desde el género. In La doble mirada: Voces e historias de mujeres indígenas latinoamericanas, ed. Néstor, Martha Sánchez. Ciudad de México: Instituto de Liderazgo Simone de Beauvoir.Google Scholar
Hernández Castillo, Rosalva Aída. 2003. Re-pensar el multiculturalismo desde el género: Las luchas por el reconocimiento cultural y los feminismos de la diversidad. La Ventana: Revista de Estudios de Género 18: 7–39.Google Scholar
Khader, Serene J. 2018. Decolonizing universalism: A transnational feminist ethic. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khader, Serene J. 2021. Doing nonideal theory about gender in global contexts: A reply to McLaren, Meyers, and Monque. Metaphilosophy 52 (1): 142–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, Ruth. 1953. Negro slavery and female status. African Affairs 52 (206): 54–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugones, María. 2007. Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia 22 (1): 186–209.Google Scholar
Maia, Cláudia de Jesus. 2011. A invenção da solteirona: Conjugalidade moderna e terror moral (Minas Gerais 1890–1948). Ilha de Santa Catarina: Mulheres.Google Scholar
McLaren, Margaret. 2021. Decolonizing feminism through intersectional praxis: On Serene Khader's Decolonizing Universalism. Metaphilosophy 52 (1): 93–110.10.1111/meta.12465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 2021. Reflections on non-imperialist, feminist values. Metaphilosophy 52 (1): 111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignolo, Walter. 2000. Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Monque, Pedro. 2021. On decolonizing social ontology and the feminist canon for transnational feminisms: Comments on Serene J. Khader's Decolonizing Universalism. Metaphilosophy 52 (1): 127–41.Google Scholar
Oyèwùmí, Oyèrónkẹ́. 1997. The invention of women: Making an African sense of western gender discourses. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Paredes, Julieta. 2010. Hilando fino desde el feminismo comunitario. La Paz: CEDEC y Mujeres Creando Comunidad.Google Scholar
Pasinato, Wânia. 2016. The Maria da Penha law: 10 years on. SUR 24: 155.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Quijano, Aníbal. 1992/2007. Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 168–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quijano, Aníbal, and Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1992. Americanity as a concept, or the Americas in the modern world-system. International Journal of Social Science 134: 549–57.Google Scholar
Rivière, Peter. 1969. Marriage among the Trio: A principle of social organization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Segato, Rita Laura. 1986/1997. Inventing nature: Family, sex and gender in the Xangô cult of Recife, Brazil. Acta Americana 5 (1): 21–60.Google Scholar
Segato, Rita Laura. 2003. Las estructuras elementales de la violencia: Ensayos sobre género entre la antropología, el psicoanálisis y los derechos humanos. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar
Segato, Rita Laura. 2006. Antropologia e direitos humanos: Alteridade e ética no movimento de expansão dos direitos universais. Mana 12 (1): 207–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segato, Rita Laura. 2007. La nación y sus otros: Raza, etnicidad y diversidad religiosa en tiempos de políticas de la identidad. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar
Segato, Rita Laura. 2010a. Los cauces profundos de la raza latinoamericana: Una relectura del mestizaje. Crítica y Emancipación 2 (3): 11–44.Google Scholar
Segato, Rita Laura. 2010b. Femi-geno-cidio como crimen en el fuero internacional de los derechos humanos: El derecho a nombrar el sufrimiento en el derecho. In Terror de género, ed. Fregoso, Rosa-Linda and Bejarano, Cinthia. México: Centro de Investigaciones de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Segato, Rita Laura. 2015. La crítica de la colonialidad en ocho ensayos y una antropología por demanda. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar
Segato, Rita Laura. 2018a. La guerra contra las mujeres. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar
Segato, Rita Laura. 2018b. Contra-pedagogías de la crueldad. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar
Segato, Rita Laura. 2018c. A manifesto in four themes. Trans. Ramsey McGlazer. Critical Times 1 (1): 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segato, Rita Laura. 2020. La politicidad de las mujeres no reconoce vanguardias. Catarsis 2: 55–65.Google Scholar
Spieler, Paula. 2011. The Maria de Penha case and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights: Contributions to the debate on domestic violence against women in Brazil. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 18: 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael. 1990. The letters of the republic: Publication and the public sphere in eighteenth-century America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
West, Robin. 1988. Jurisprudence and gender. University of Chicago Law Review 55 (1): 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar