Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T18:20:55.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Girl Talk: Understanding Negative Reactions to Female Vocal Fry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2021

Monika Chao  and
Julia R. S. Bursten Open the ORCID record for Julia R. S. Bursten [Opens in a new window]
Monika Chao*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of California–Berkeley, 314 Moses Hall #2390, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Julia R. S. Bursten
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Kentucky, 1415 Patterson Office Tower, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
*
Corresponding author mchaos@berkeley.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vocal fry is a phonation, or voicing, in which an individual drops their voice below its natural register and consequently emits a low, growly, creaky tone of voice. Media outlets have widely acknowledged it as a generational vocal style characteristic of millennial women. Critics of vocal fry often claim that it is an exclusively female vocal pattern, and some say that the voicing is so distracting that they cannot understand what is being said under the phonation. Claiming that a phonation is so distracting as to prevent uptake of the semantic content of an utterance associated with it is an extreme reaction, especially when accompanied by demands for women to change their phonation. We argue that this reaction limits women's communicative autonomy. We analyze the extreme reaction to female vocal fry, which we characterize as a non-content-based response, from the perspectives of philosophy of language, feminist epistemology, and linguistics. We argue that when fry is heard as annoying and distracting, it is because the hearer interprets the speaker as echoing an utterance from a position of authority to which she is not entitled. We show that this reaction encodes conscious or unconscious sexist attitudes toward women's voices.

Type
Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , Winter 2021 , pp. 42 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Rindy, and Klofstad, Casey. 2012. Preference for leaders with masculine voices holds in the case of feminine leadership roles. PLoS One 7 (12).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Rindy, Klofstad, Casey, Mayew, William, and Venkatachalam, Mohan. 2014. Vocal fry may undermine the success of young women in the labor market. PLoS One 9 (5).Google ScholarPubMed
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Jeannine. 2006. Stylistic variation and the construction of masculinity in dynamic conversational settings. American Dialect Society Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
Catford, John. 1964. Phonation types: The classification of some laryngeal components of speech production. In In honor of Daniel Jones: Papers contributed on the occasion of his eightieth birthday, 12 September 1961, ed. Abercrombie, D., Fry, D., MacCarthy, P., Scott, N., and Trim, J.. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2011. Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia 26 (2): 236–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2014. Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology 28 (2): 115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2018. Accumulating epistemic power: A problem with epistemology. Philosophical Topics 46 (1): 129–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esling, John. 1978. Voice quality in Edinburgh: a sociolinguistic and phonetic Study. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 2003. Chicano English in context. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfield, Bob, and Vuolo, Mike. 2013. Get your creak on. Lexicon Valley Ep. 24, January. https://podbay.fm/podcast/500673866/e/1356931800.Google Scholar
Glass, Ira. 2015. Freedom fries. In “If you don't have anything nice to say, SAY IT IN ALL CAPS,” This American Life Ep. 545. WBEZ Chicago, Jan. 23. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/545/if-you-dont-have-anything-nice-to-say-say-it-in-all-caps.Google Scholar
Gobl, Christer, and Chasaide, Ailbhe. 2003. The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude. Speech Communication 40 (1): 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, and Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29 (4): 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grose, Jessica. 2015. From upspeak to vocal fry: Are we “policing” young women's voices? National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2015/07/23/425608745/from-upspeak-to-vocal-fry-are-we-policing-young-womens-voices.Google Scholar
Hollien, Harry, Moore, Paul, Wendahl, Ronald W., and Michel, John F. 1966. On the nature of vocal fry. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 9 (2): 245–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornsby, Jennifer. 1995. Disempowered speech. Philosophical Topics 23 (2): 127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer, and Langton, Rae. 1998. Free speech and illocution. Legal Theory 4 (1): 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Emily. 2014. Vocal fry, made famous by Kim Kardashian, is making young women “less hirable.” Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/vocal-fry_n_6082220.Google Scholar
Khazan, Olga. 2014. Vocal fry may hurt women's job prospects. The Atlantic, May.Google Scholar
Kukla, (Quill) Rebecca. 2012. Performative force, convention, and discursive injustice. Hypatia 29 (2): 440–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukla, ( Quill) Rebecca, and Lance, Mark. 2009. ‘Yo!’and ‘Lo!’: The pragmatic topography of the space of reasons. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. 1993. Speech acts and unspeakable acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (4): 293–330.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, Daniel, and Sicoli, Mark. 2007. Creaky voice: Constructions of gender and authority in American English conversation. In 106th annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC. Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Loss, Sara, and Zold, Elizabeth. 2014. Use and perception of creaky voice quality in U.S. women's speech. New Ways of Analyzing Variation 43. http://www.nwav43.illinois.edu/program/documents/LossZold-LongAbstract_2014_09_13_23_27_30_153.pdf.Google Scholar
Maitra, Ishani. 2018. New words for old wrongs. Episteme 15 (3): 345–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2011. The semiotic hitchhiker's guide to creaky voice: Circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21 (2): 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Sound Symbolism, ed. Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, and Ohala, John J.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pisanski, Katarzyna, and Feinberg, David. 2017. Vocal attractiveness. In The Oxford handbook of voice perception, ed. Frühholz, Sascha and Belin, Pascal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert. 2013. Gender and the social meaning of non-modal phonation types. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Speck, Barry. 2006. Voice and the construction of identity and meaning. In In-roads of language: Essays in English studies. Castelló, Spain: Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane. 1999. Glasgow: Accent and voice quality. In Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles, ed. Foulkes, Paul and Docherty, Gerard. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Edwards, Vanessa. n.d. Vocal fry: What it is and how to get rid of it. In Science of People, https://www.scienceofpeople.com/vocal-fry/.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Sperber, Dan. 2012. Meaning and relevance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Naomi. 2015. Young women, give up the vocal fry and reclaim your strong voice. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/24/vocal-fry-strong-female-voice.Google Scholar
Yuasa, Ikuko. 2010. Creaky voice: A new feminine voice quality for young urban-oriented upwardly mobile American women? American Speech 85 (3): 315–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chao and Bursten supplementary material

Chao and Bursten supplementary material

Download Chao and Bursten supplementary material(File)
File 16 KB