Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:40:26.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Learning to Think Intercontinentally: Finding Australian Routes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

This introductory essay argues that it is a mistake to represent Australian feminist philosophy as a kind of discourse theory that is “downstream” of the French post-structuralists or North American postmodernists. Starting with the local—and the specifically Australian modes of racial exclusion, in particular—and exploring some of the byways of philosophy, what we encounter is a range of ontological, ethical, and political models that allow a reconfiguration of self, community, and social change.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, Damien. 1999. Review of Transitions: New Australian feminisms, ed. B. Caine and R. Pringle and Along the faultlines by S. Sheridan. Signs 24 (3): 802–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Michele. 1988. Women's oppression today: The Marxistlfeminist encounter. Revised ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Battersby, Christine. 1998. The phenomenal woman: Feminist metaphysics and the patterns of identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bulbeck, Chilla. 1997. Living feminism: The impact of the women's movement on three generations of Australian women. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caine, Barbara, and Pringle, Rosemary, eds. 1995. Transitions: New Australian feminisms. St Leonards, N.S.W.: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Cavarero, Adriana. 1999. Unique, sexed selves and radical democracy: Janice Richardson interviews Adriana Cavarero. Women's Philosophy Review 21 (Spring): 725.Google Scholar
Cavarero, Adriana. 2000. Relating narratives: Storytelling and selfhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Joseph. 1904. Speech at the Guildhall, 19 Jan. 1904. The Times, 20 January.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 1995. Ethics of eros: Irigaray's rewriting of the philosophers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Curthoys, Jean. 1997. Feminist amnesia: The wake of women's liberation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Spinoza: Practical philosophy. Trans. Hurley, R. San Francisco: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1990. Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. Trans. Joughin, Martin. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1994. What is philosophy? Trans. Burchell, Graham and Tomlinson, Hugh. London: Verso, 1994.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope. 1997. Yielding gender: Feminism, deconstruction and the history of philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1991. Feminism and philosophy. Perspectives on difference and equality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1996a. Imaginary bodies: Ethics, power and corporeality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1996b. Through a Spinozist lens: Ethology, difference, power. In Deleuze: A critical reader, ed. Patton, Paul. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1998. Sociability and inclusion. In Australian feminism: A companion, ed. Caine, Barbaraet al. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira, and Lloyd, Genevieve. 1999. Collective imaginings: Spinoza, past and present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Green, Karen. 1999. A plague on both your houses. The Monist 82 (2): 278303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1989. Sexual subversions: Three French feminists. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1990. Jacques Lacan: A feminist introduction. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth, ed. 1999. Becomings: Explorations in time, memory and futures. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Burke, C. and Gill, G. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Pauline. 1998. Liberation theory, feminism, and utopianism. In Australian feminism: A companion, ed. Caine, Barbaraet al. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Leng, Kwok Wei. 1995. New Australian feminism: Towards a discursive politics of Australian feminist thought. Antithesis 1: 4763.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in western philosophy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1994. Part of nature: Self‐knowledge in Spinoza's Ethics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1996. Spinoza and the Ethics. London: Routledge Philosophy Guidebook.Google Scholar
Moulton, Janice. 1989. A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In Women, knowledge and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy, ed. Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar