Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:40:46.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seeing Oneself through the Eyes of the Other: Asymmetrical Reciprocity and Self-respect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Marguerite La Caze
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Iris Marion Young argues we cannot understand others’ experiences by imagining ourselves in their place or in terms of symmetrical reciprocity (1997a). For Young, reciprocity expresses moral respect and asymmetry arises from people's greatly varying life histories and social positions. La Caze argues there are problems with Young's articulation of asymmetrical reciprocity in terms of wonder and the gift. By discussing friendship and political representation, she shows how taking self-respect into account complicates asymmetrical reciprocity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 23 , Issue 3: Special Issue: In Honor of Iris Marion Young: Theorist and Practitioner of Justice , September 2008 , pp. 118 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1958/1998. The human condition. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1982. Lectures on Kant's political philosophy. Ed. Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belenky, Mary Field, McVicker Clinchy, Blythe, Rule Goldberger, Nancy, and Tarule, Jill Mattuck. 1986. Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1991. Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina ed. 2001. Feminist interpretations of Emmanuel Levinas. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Damian, La Caze, Marguerite, and Levine, Michael. 2003. Integrity and the fragile self. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1992. Given time: I. Counterfeit money. Trans. Kamuf, Peggy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1649/1989. The passions of the soul. Trans. Voss, Stephen H.Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Dillon, Robin S. 1997. Self‐respect: moral, emotional, political. Ethics 112 (1): 53–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, Robin S. 2004. What's a woman worth? What's life worth? Without self‐respect!”: On the value of evaluative self‐respect. In Moral psychology: Feminist ethics and social theory, ed. DesAutels, Peggy and Walker, Margaret Urban. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1993. What are friends for? Feminist perspectives on personal relationships and moral theory. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 2004. Diversity, trust, and moral understanding. In Setting the moral compass: Essays by women philosophers, ed. Calhoun, Cheshire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1993. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: “What is strong objectivity?” In Feminist epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, Linda and Potter, Elizabeth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminism, and epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1985. Money, sex, and power: Toward a feminist historical materialism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. Speculum of the other woman. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1991. Questions to Emmanuel Levinas. In The Irigaray reader, ed. Whitford, Margaret. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Practical philosophy. Trans. Gregor, Mary J.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
La Caze, Marguerite. 2002a. The analytic imaginary. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
La Caze, Marguerite. 2002b. The encounter between wonder and generosity. Hypatia 17 (3): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Caze, Marguerite. 2005. Love, that indispensable supplement: Irigaray and Kant on love and respect. Hypatia 20 (3): 92–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Caze, Marguerite. 2006. Splitting the difference: Between Young and Fraser on identity politics. In Feminist alliances, ed. Burns, Lynda. New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Le Dœuff, Michèle. 1995. Problèmes d'investiture (De la parité, Etc.). Nouvelles questions féministes 16 (2): 5–80.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1974/1998. Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Trans. Lingis, Alphonso. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Matuštik, Martin J. Beck. 2003. Review of Lorenzo C. Simpson, The unfinished project: Toward a postmetaphysical humanism, New York: Routledge, 2001. Theory, culture & society 20 (4): 143–52.Google Scholar
Perpich, Diane. 2001. From the caress to the word: Transcendence and the feminine in the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. In Chanter, Feminist interpretations of Emmanuel Levinas.Google Scholar
Schrift, Alan D. 1997. The logic of the gift: Toward an ethic of generosity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sikka, Sonia. 2001. The delightful other: Portraits of the feminine in Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and Levinas. In Chanter, Feminist interpretations of Emmanuel Levinas.Google Scholar
Simpson, Lorenzo C. 2001. The unfinished project: Toward a postmetaphysical humanism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stoller, Silvia. 2005. Asymmetrical genders: Phenomenological reflections on sexual difference. Hypatia 20 (2): 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessman, Lisa. 2005. Burdened virtues: Virtue ethics for liberatory struggles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gail. 1995. Creative agency and fluid images: A review of Iris Young's “Throwing like a girl” and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory (1990). Human Studies 17: 471–78.Google Scholar
White, Richard. 1999. Friendship and commitment. 32 33: 79–88.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990a. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990b. “Throwing like a girl” and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1997a. Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1997b. Unruly categories: A critique of Nancy Fraser's dual systems theory. 32 222: 147–60.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2005. On female body experience: “Throwing like a girl” and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziarek, Ewa Plonowska. 2001. The ethical passions of Emmanuel Levinas. In Chanter, Feminist interpretations of Emmanuel Levinas.Google Scholar