Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-01T03:34:30.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simone de Beauvoir and Hannah Arendt on Labor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Andrea Veltman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comparing the typologies of human activities developed by Beauvoir and Arendt, I argue that these philosophers share the same concept of labor as well as a similar insight that labor cannot provide a justification or evaluative measure for human life. But Beauvoir and Arendt think differently about work (as contrasted with labor), and Arendt alone illuminates the inability of constructive work to provide non-utilitarian value for human existence. Beauvoir, on the other hand, exceeds Arendt in examining the ethical implications of our existential need for a plurality of free peers in a public realm.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 25 , Issue 1: Special Issue: FEAST I: Current Work in Feminist Ethics and Social Theory , Winter 2010 , pp. 55 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1941. Nicomachean ethics, Eudemian ethics, and politics. In The basic works of Aristotle, ed. McKeon, Richard. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1948. The ethics of ambiguity. Trans. Bernard Frechtman. New York: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1952/1993. The second sex. Trans. and ed. Parshley, Howard Madison. New York: Random House/Knopf.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1983. Who shall die? Trans. Claude Francis and Frenande Gontier. Florissant, Mo.: River Press.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2004. Pyrrhus and Cineas. Trans. Marybeth Timmermann. In Simone de Beauvoir: philosophical writings, ed. Simons, Margaret and De Beauvoir, Sylvie Le Bon. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 77–150.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2003. The reluctant modernism of Hannah Arendt. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. 1992. Hannah Arendt: A reinterpretation of her political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511521300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, Mary. 2002. Turning operations: Feminism, Arendt, and politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 1972. The origin of the family, private property and the state. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Gurtler, Sabine. 2005. The ethical dimension of work: A feminist perspective. Trans. Andrew Smith. Hypatia 20 (2): 119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1989. Birth and death. Ethics 99 (2): 362–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Alison, and McBride, William. 1985. ‘Reproduction’ as male ideology. Women's Studies International Forum 8 (3): 185–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruks, Sonia. 1998. Beauvoir: The weight of situation. In Simone de Beauvoir: A critical reader, ed. Fallaize, Elizabeth. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 45–71.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1924. Second treatise of government. In Two treatises of government. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Lundgren‐Gothlin, Eva. 1996. Sex and existence: Simone de Beauvoir's the second sex. Trans. Linda Schenck. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1971. Capital, Vol. 3. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1975a. Capital, Vol. 1. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1975b. Theories of surplus value. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Frederick. 1979. The German ideology. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Meiksins, Peter. 1981. Productive and unproductive labor and Marx's theory of class. Review of Radical Political Economics 13 (3): 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Mary. 1981. The politics of reproduction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1981. Justice: On relating private and public. Political Theory 9 (3): 327–52.10.1177/009059178100900304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1937. The wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1899/1971. A theory of the leisure class. New York: A. M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Veltman, Andrea. 2004. The Sisyphean torture of housework. Hypatia 19 (3): 121–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veltman, Andrea. 2006. Transcendence and immanence in the ethics of Simone de Beauvoir. In Simone de Beauvoir: Critical essays, ed. Simons, Margaret. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 113–31.Google Scholar
Veltman, Andrea. 2008. The concept of transcendence in Beauvoir and Sartre. In Beauvoir and Sartre: The riddle of influence, ed. Daigle, Christine and Golomb, Jacob. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 222–40.Google Scholar