Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T06:28:05.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward an Ecofeminist New Materialism: Agency and Action in a More-Than-Human World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2025

Ela Tokay Open the ORCID record for Ela Tokay [Opens in a new window]
Ela Tokay*
Affiliation:
Department of History & Philosophy, SUNY Old Westbury, NY, USA
*
Email: tokaye@oldwestbury.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The realities of the Anthropocene, from climate change to pandemics to plastics, necessitate substantially different ways of understanding what it means to act in the world today. In response, feminist scholars within the field of new materialism have attempted to rethink the nature of agency and action. This article focuses on two unresolved challenges with their framework: first, it lacks a way to make distinctions or draw boundaries between different entities and actors and, second, it simplifies the relationship between ontology and ethics, implying that an ontological transformation will lead to more ethical and just relationships with the more-than-human world. I argue that to address these challenges new materialism should look to ecofeminism, particularly the philosophy of Val Plumwood; this pairing is especially pertinent considering the often overlooked or downplayed genealogical connections between them. I also argue, however, that new materialism has something to offer Plumwood: its reconceptualization of agency better responds to contemporary circumstances in ways foreclosed by Plumwood’s more limited account. I conclude that a coalition between new materialism and ecofeminism—a new materialism supplemented and modified by aspects of Plumwood’s account—provides valuable conceptual tools with which to respond to the Anthropocene condition.

Type
Article
Information
Hypatia , First View , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abram, David. 2010. Becoming animal: An earthly cosmology. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Adams, Carol J. 1990. The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2008. Imaginary prohibitions: Some preliminary remarks on the founding gestures of the “new materialism.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 15 (1): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807084854 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alaimo, Stacey. 2008. Trans-corporeal feminisms and the ethical space of nature. In Material feminisms, ed. Alaimo, Stacey and Hekman, Susan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Alaimo, Stacey. 2010. Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Alaimo, Stacey, and Hekman, Susan. 2008. Introduction: Emerging models of materiality in feminist theory. In Material feminisms, ed. Alaimo, Stacey and Hekman, Susan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2008. Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. In Material feminisms, ed. Alaimo, Stacey and Hekman, Susan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Barca, Stefania. 2020. Forces of reproduction: Notes for a counter-hegemonic Anthropocene. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battistoni, Alyssa. 2017. Bringing in the work of nature: From natural capital to hybrid labor. Political Theory 45 (1): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Burkhart, Brian. 2019. Indigenizing philosophy through the land: A trickster methodology for decolonizing environmental ethics and indigenous futures. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casselot, Marie-Anne. 2016. Ecofeminist echoes in new materialism? PhaenEx 11 (1): 73–96, https://doi.org/10.22329/p.v11i1.439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, Diana, and Frost, Samantha. 2010. Introducing the new materialisms. In New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics, ed. Coole, Diana and Frost, Samantha. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Crist, Eileen. 2016. On the poverty of our nomenclature. In Anthropocene or capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism, ed. Jason, W. Moore. Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar
Cuomo, Chris. 2005. Ethics and the eco/feminist self. In Environmental philosophy: From animal rights to radical ecology, ed. Michael, E. Zimmerman, Baird Callicott, J., Karen, J. Warren, Irene, J. Klaver, and Clark, J.. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Curtin, Deane. 1991. Toward an ecological ethic of care. Hypatia 6 (1): 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Heather. 2022. Plastic matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gaard, Greta. 1997. Toward a queer ecofeminism. Hypatia 12 (1): 114–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00174.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaard, Greta. 2011. Ecofeminism revisited: Rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist environmentalism. Feminist Formations 23 (2): 26–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaard, Greta. 2014. Indigenous women, feminism, and the environmental humanities. Resilience: A Journal of the Environmental Humanities 1 (3): 86–99. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/17/article/569974/pdf.Google Scholar
Gaard, Greta. 2017. Critical ecofeminism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Amitav. 2021. The nutmeg’s curse: Parables for a planet in crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraud, Eva Haifa. 2019. What comes after entanglement? Activism, anthropocentrism, and an ethics of exclusion. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, Lori. 2015. Entangled empathy: An alternative ethic for our relationships with animals. Brooklyn, NY: Lantern Publishing & Media.Google Scholar
Gruen, Lori, and Crary, Alice. 2022. Animal crisis: A new critical theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive. 2017. Defiant Earth: The fate of humans in the Anthropocene. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Michael J. 2022. What a mushroom lives for: Matsutake and the worlds they make. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Dale. 2014. Reason in a dark time: Why the struggle against climate change failed—and what it means for our future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karera, Axelle. 2019. Blackness and the pitfalls of Anthropocene ethics. Critical Philosophy of Race 7 (1): 32–56. Project MUSE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmerer, Robin Wall. 2013. Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.Google Scholar
LaDuke, Winona. 1999. All our relations: Native struggles for land and life. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2014. Agency at the time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History 45: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liboiron, Max. 2021. Pollution is colonialism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Macbride, Samantha. 2011. Recycling reconsidered: The present failure and future promise of environmental action in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, Sherilyn. 2020. Making matter great again? Ecofeminism, new materialism and the everyday turn in environmental politics. Environmental Politics 30 (1–2): 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1846954 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malm, Andreas. 2018. The progress of this storm: Nature and society in a warming world. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Mathews, Freya. 2017. The dilemma of dualism. In Routledge handbook of gender and environment, ed. MacGregor, Sherilyn. London: Routledge. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315886572.ch3 Google Scholar
Mellor, Mary. 2018. Care as wealth. In Feminist political ecology and the economics of care, ed. Bauhardt, Christine and Harcourt, Wendy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria, and Shiva, Vandana. 1993. Ecofeminism. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Jason W. 2016. Introduction: Anthropocene or capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. In Anthropocene or capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism, ed. Jason W. Moore. Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar
Naess, Arne. 1973. The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry 16 (1–4): 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppermann, Serpil, and Iovino, Serenella. 2017. The environmental humanities and the challenges of the Anthropocene. In Environmental humanities: Voices from the Anthropocene, ed. Oppermann, Serpil and Iovino, Serenella. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Pellow, David Naguib. 2018. What is critical environmental justice? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Keith R. 2012. Ecosystem services, nonhuman agencies, and diffuse dependence. Environmental Philosophy 9 (2): 1–20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Keith R. 2020. A world not made for us: Topics in critical environmental philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Peterson, Keith R. 2021. The very idea of an ecological worldview. Ethics and the Environment 26 (1): 21–55. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.26.1.01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plumwood, Val. 2001. Nature as agency and the prospects for a progressive naturalism. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 12 (4): 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455750110124522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumwood, Val. 2002a. Decolonizing relationships with nature. Philosophy, Activism, Nature (2): 7–30. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=76263fa841ac5cbae4bd8844a03d6d8abd8d5327 Google Scholar
Plumwood, Val. 2002b. Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plumwood, Val. 2006. The concept of a cultural landscape: Nature, culture and agency in the land. Ethics and the Environment 11 (2): 115–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumwood, Val. 2009. Nature in the active voice. Australian Humanities Review 46. http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-May-2009/plumwood.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Routley, Val, and Routley, Richard. 1980. Social theories, self management, and environmental problems. In Environmental philosophy, ed. Mannison, D. S., McRobbie, M. A., and Routley, R.. Canberra: Australian National University Department of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Salleh, Ariel. 1997. Ecofeminism as politics: Nature, Marx and the postmodern. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Salleh, Ariel. 2009. Nature, woman, labor, capital: Living the deepest contradiction. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 6 (1): 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455759509358619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandilands, Catriona. 1999. The good-natured feminist: Ecofeminism and the quest for democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sandilands, Catriona. 2002. Lesbian separatist communities and the experience of nature: Toward a queer ecology. Organization & Environment 15 (2): 131–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082660201500200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrake, Merlin. 2020. Entangled life: How fungi make our worlds, change our minds and shape our futures. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Simard, Suzanne. 2021. Finding the mother tree: Discovering the wisdom of the forest. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Soper, Kate. 2020. Post-growth living: For an alternative hedonism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Tallbear, Kim. 2019. Caretaking relations, not American dreaming. Kalfou: A Journal of Comparative and Relational Ethnic Studies 6 (1): 24–41. https://doi.org/10.15367/kf.v6i1.228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Sunaura. 2014. Interdependent animals: A feminist disability ethic-of-care. In Ecofeminism: Feminist intersections with other animals and the earth, ed. Carol, J. Adams and Gruen, Lori. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Todd, Zoe. 2017. Fish, kin and hope: Tending to water violations in amiskwaciwâskahikan and treaty six territory. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry 43 (1): 102–07. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.1086/692559 Google Scholar
Tsing, Anna. 2017. The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tsing, Anna. 2022. Forward to What a mushroom lives for: Matsutake and the worlds they make, ed. Michael J. Hathaway. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuana, Nancy. 2008. Viscous porosity: Witnessing Katrina. In Material feminisms, ed. Alaimo, Stacey and Hekman, Susan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Verlie, Blanche. 2022. Climate justice in more-than-human worlds. Environmental Politics 31 (2): 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1981081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Karen. 2000. Ecofeminist philosophy: A Western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen. 2003. The power and promise of ecological feminism. In The environmental ethics and policy book: Philosophy, ecology, economics, ed. Donald Van DeVeer and Christine Pierce. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen. 2005. Ecofeminism and social justice: Introduction. In Environmental philosophy: From animal rights to radical ecology, ed. Michael E. Zimmerman, J. Baird Callicott, Karen J. Warren, Irene J. Klaver, and J. Clark. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Whyte, Kyle. 2020. Indigenous environmental justice: Anti-colonial action through kinship. In Environmental justice, ed. Coolsaet, Brendan. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wingrove, Elizabeth and Washick, Bonnie. 2015. Politics that matter: Thinking about power and justice with the new materialists. Contemporary Political Theory 14 (1): 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2014.19 Google Scholar