No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Arbitration — Investment dispute — Enforcement of two guarantees — Claimant loaning monies to local statutory corporation — Respondent guaranteeing loans in 1990 and 1993 agreements — Loans for power station improvement project — Applicable law — Whether implied representation by Claimant that project viable and suitable — Whether Claimant owing duty of care to Respondent — Whether breach of duty of care — Whether inequality of bargaining power
Award — Stay of enforcement — Applicable standards — Interpretation — ICSID Convention, Article 52(5) — ICSID Arbitration Rules, Rule 54 — Merits of application — Catastrophic consequences — Recovery of payment — Prejudice to prospects of collecting Award — Provision of security
Annulment — Annulment of Award — Investment dispute — Whether serious departure from fundamental rule of procedure — Whether failure to state reasons — Whether Tribunal exceeding its powers
Interpretation — ICSID Convention, Article 52(1)(b), (d) and (e) — Whether Tribunal manifestly exceeding its powers — Whether serious departure from fundamental rule of procedure — Whether Award failing to state reasons on which based
Costs — ICSID Convention, Article 52(1)(e) — Whether applicable to costs — Allocation — Payment of legal expenses — Interest