Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:41:20.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fedax NV v. Republic of Venezuela

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  09 March 1998 ; 11 July 1997 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Interpretation — Article 25(1) of the icsid Convention — Characterization of a legal dispute — Conflict of rights vs. conflict of interests — Question of legal rights and obligations in connection with investment — Characterization of “investment” — Loans and promissory notes as investment — Purchase and assignment of promissory notes foreseen

Treaties — Bilateral investment treaty — Investment broadly defined under treaty — Standard approach of bilateral and multilateral investment treaties — Practice of State Party consistent in relation to its other bilateral and multilateral investment treaties — State Party has not exercised right under Article 25(1) of the icsid Convention to exclude any class of investment

Municipal law — Promissory notes issued in compliance with Commercial Code and Law on Public Credit — Payments authorized at highest level of government — Budgetary appropriation by Congress to finance payments

Jurisdiction — icsid jurisdiction specifically provided for in bilateral investment treaty — Sources of applicable law including internal law, the Investment Agreement, general principles of international law

Keywords

InterpretationTreatiesMunicipal lawJurisdiction
Type
Case Report
Information
ICSID Reports , Volume 5 , 2002 , pp. 183 - 208
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)