Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:16:41.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  22 May 2012 ; 17 May 2012 ; 03 February 2014 ; 20 February 2015 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Fair and equitable treatment — Minimum standard of treatment — NAFTA, Article 1105 — Customary international law — Legitimate expectation — Legal stability — Whether the minimum standard protected an investor’s legitimate expectations — Whether the minimum standard protects an investor from changes in the legal and business framework — Whether the State made any promise or representation of a contractual nature — Whether the measures constituted egregious behaviour

Performance requirements — NAFTA, Article 1106 — Interpretation — Meaning of “services” — Whether research and development qualified as services — Whether the measure required the investor to prefer local goods and services

Defence — Exclusions and reservations — NAFTA, Article 1108 — Subordinate measures — Whether a subordinate measure was adopted under the authority of and consistent with the reserved measure — Whether new subordinate measures should be assessed for consistency with existing subordinate measures

Remedies — Future damages — NAFTA, Article 1116 — Whether a tribunal may award compensation for future damages

Remedies — Standard of proof — Customary international law — Whether compensation could be made for obligations incurred but not yet paid — Whether uncertainty was to be construed against the wrongdoer

Remedies — Quantum — Customary international law — Whether a tribunal may increase compensation to offset an investor’s future tax liability

Remedies — Quantum — Whether losses represented expenditure undertaken pursuant to the measure or would have been made in the ordinary course of business — Whether compensation should be decreased to reflect tax benefits and royalty payment deductions enjoyed by an investor

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)