Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:23:35.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  08 February 2005 ; 06 September 2005 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Jurisdiction — Energy Charter Treaty, 1994, Article 26 — ICSID Convention, Article 25 — Whether ICSID Tribunal having jurisdiction to decide on merits of Claimant’s claims for alleged breaches of Part III of Energy Charter Treaty — Consent to arbitration — Relevance of Article 17(1) of Energy Charter Treaty — Burden of proof — Whether allegation of treaty violation sufficient to establish jurisdiction — Whether jurisdictional requirements of Articles 1 and 26 of Energy Charter Treaty satisfied

Jurisdiction — Bulgaria-Cyprus Bilateral Investment Treaty, 1987 — Consent to arbitration — Most-favoured-nation provision — Interpretation — Scope — Reading of MFN provision with other BITs to which Bulgaria Contracting Party — Whether providing Respondent’s consent to ICSID arbitration — Whether entitling Claimant to rely on dispute settlement provisions in these other BITs

Treaties — Energy Charter Treaty, 1994 — Article 17(1) — Whether State’s exercise of right of denial under Article 17(1) having retrospective effect — Whether Claimant company having substantial business activity in Cyprus — Ownership or control of Claimant

Provisional measures — ICSID Convention, Article 47 — ICSID Arbitration Rule 39(1) — Preservation of rights relating to dispute — Urgent need for relief — Irreparable harm

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)