Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:17:18.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Putting successful aging into context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2020

Gretchen A. Petery*
Affiliation:
Curtin University
Lucinda J. Iles
Affiliation:
Curtin University
Sharon K. Parker
Affiliation:
Curtin University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: gretchen.petery@curtin.edu.au

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR; project number CE170100005).

References

Andrei, D. M., Parker, S. K., Constantin, A., Baird, M., Iles, L., Petery, G., Zoszak, L., Williams, A., & Chen, S. (2019). Maximising potential: Findings from the Mature Workers in Organisations Survey (MWOS). (Industry Report). Centre for Excellence in Population Ageing Research Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In Baltes, P. B. & Baltes, M. M. (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 134). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7, 560569.10.5465/amr.1982.4285240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386408.10.5465/amr.2006.20208687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooij, D. A. M., Zacher, H., Wang, M., & Heckhausen, J. (2020). Successful aging at work: A process model to guide future research and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop2020.1 Google Scholar
Pak, K., Kooij, D. T. A. M., De Lange, A. H., & Van Veldhoven, M. J. P. M. (2019). Human resource management and the ability, motivation and opportunity to continue working. Human Resource Management Review, 29, 336352. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S. K., & Andrei, D. M. (2020). Include, individualize, and integrate: Organizational meta-strategies for mature workers. Work, Aging and Retirement, 6, 17. doi: 10.1093/worker/waz009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36, 633–622. doi: 10.1177/0149206308321554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, R. (2019). The value of experience: Age discrimination against older workers persists. AARP Research. https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00177.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35, 158188. doi: 10.1177/014906308318617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37, 12621289. doi: 10.1177/0149206310385943 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 724). Chicago: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar
van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2006). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–41. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://repub.eur.nl/pub/11820/Work_Group_Diversity.pdf&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm3ckz38wswegaim59fWsn9W3z89Zg&nossl=1&oi=scholarr 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546CrossRefGoogle Scholar