Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T03:16:30.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agility in the workplace: Conceptual analysis, contributing factors, and practical examples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2021

Moritz K. H. Petermann Open the ORCID record for Moritz K. H. Petermann [Opens in a new window]  and
Hannes Zacher Open the ORCID record for Hannes Zacher [Opens in a new window]
Moritz K. H. Petermann*
Affiliation:
Daimler & Leipzig University
Hannes Zacher*
Affiliation:
Leipzig University
*
*Corresponding authors. Emails: moritz.petermann@uni-leipzig.de; hannes.zacher@uni-leipzig.de
*Corresponding authors. Emails: moritz.petermann@uni-leipzig.de; hannes.zacher@uni-leipzig.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the last few years, the concept of agility has become increasingly popular in organizations. Companies are hoping to foster speed, adaptability, and innovation by rolling out an agile strategy, implementing agile methods, and creating an agile mind-set among leaders and employees. There is, however, much ambiguity about what the concept of agility entails and how it can be successfully implemented in an organization. The purpose of this practice-focused paper is to organize the extant agility literature for readers by giving an overview of different definitions of agility; outlining evidence-based factors that contribute to agility at the individual, team, and organizational levels; and describing three practical examples at a large German car company. Finally, the authors suggest steps that organizations can take to increase agility in their workforce.

Keywords

agilityagile workforceadaptabilityinnovation
Type
Practice Forum
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 599 - 609
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghina, W., Ahlbäck, K., De Smet, A., Lackey, G., Lurie, M., Murarka, M., & Handscomb, C. (2017). The 5 trademarks of agile organizations. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/the-five-trademarks-of-agile-organizations Google Scholar
Baran, B. E., & Bible, S. C. (2019). Agility and agile: An introduction for people, teams, and organizations (Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology White Paper Series). https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5a66063790bade65840ba943/t/5d83e4297d51593a02acc632/1568924715737/Ben%27s+SIOP+Paper.pdf Google Scholar
Braun, T. J., Hayes, B. C., DeMuth, R. L. F., & Taran, O. A. (2017). The development, validation, and practical application of an employee agility and resilience measure to facilitate organizational change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10(4), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2017.79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, Y. H., Hsu, C. C., & Shih, H. A. (2017). Extroversion personality, domain knowledge, and the creativity of new product development engineers. Creativity Research Journal, 29(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1376501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chonko, L. B., & Jones, E. (2005). The need for speed: Agility selling. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 25(4), 371–382. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40472226 Google Scholar
Derue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., & Myers, C. G. (2012). Learning agility: In search of conceptual clarity and theoretical grounding. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01444.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doeze Jager-Van Vliet, S. (2017). Proactive and adaptive agility among employees: The relationship with personal and situational factors. [Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam]. Erasmus University Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/103260 Google Scholar
Dyer, L., & Shafer, R. A. (2003). Dynamic organizations: Achieving marketplace and organizational agility with people (CAHRS Working Paper Series). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=cahrswp Google Scholar
Eilers, S., Möckel, K., Rump, J., & Schabel, F. (2018). Hays Studie HR Report 2018—Schwerpunkt: Agile organisation auf dem Prüfungstand, 32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/2 Google Scholar
Engeser, S., & Langens, T. (2010). Mapping explicit social motives of achievement, power, and affiliation onto the five-factor model of personality. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00773.x Google ScholarPubMed
Feist, G. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoda, R., & Noble, J. (2017, May 20–28). Becoming agile: A grounded theory of agile transitions in practice [Paper presentation]. 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Buenos Aires (pp. 141–151). doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2017.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruping, L. M., Venkatesh, V., & Agarwal, R. (2009). A control theory perspective on agile methodology use and changing user requirements. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muduli, A., & Pandya, G. (2018). Psychological empowerment and workforce agility. Psychological Studies, 63(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0456-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonka, F. E. (1997). Developing a lean and agile work force. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 7(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6564(199724)7:1<11:AID- HFM2>3.0.CO;2-J3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragin-Skorecka, K. (2016). Agile enterprise: A human factors perspective. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razmi, B., & Ghasemi, H. M. (2015). Designing a model of organizational agility: A case study of Ardabil Gas Company. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 4(2), 100–117. https://ijol.cikd.ca/article_60224.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2017). The Scrum guide: The definitive guide to Scrum: The rules of the game. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2009.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherehiy, B., & Karwowski, W. (2014). The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(3), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2014). Strategic agility: A state of the art introduction to the special section on strategic agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitworth, E., & Biddle, R. (2007). Motivation and cohesion in agile teams. In Concas, G., Damiani, E., Scotto, M., & Succi, G. (Eds.), Agile processes in software engineering and extreme programming. XP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (vol. 4536, pp. 62–69). Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73101-6_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winby, S., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Management processes for agility, speed, and innovation. Organizational Dynamics, 43(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2014.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., & Sharifi, H. (2000). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(4), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010314818 CrossRefGoogle Scholar