Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:52:18.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Criterion Problem in Executive Coaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Ian M. Smith ,
Matthew J. Borneman ,
Bradley J. Brummel  and
Brian S. Connelly
Ian M. Smith*
Affiliation:
The University of Tulsa
Matthew J. Borneman
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Bradley J. Brummel
Affiliation:
The University of Tulsa
Brian S. Connelly
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
*
E-mail: ian-smith@utulsa.edu, Address: Ian M. Smith, Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Lorton Hall 308, 800 South Tucker Drive, Tulsa, OK 74104.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 288 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, N218 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455

**

Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Lorton Hall 308, 800 South Tucker Drive, Tulsa, OK 74104

***

Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Road, Unit 1020, Storrs, CT 06269.

*

Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript; order of authorship is arbitrary.

References

Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917–1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836–874.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., & Kuncel, N. R. (2002). Individual and team training. In Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 278–312). London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In Schmitt, N. & Borman, W. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1976). Evaluation of training. In Craig, R. L. (Ed.), Training and development handbook (pp. 18–27). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kombarakaran, F. A., Yang, J. A., Baker, M. N., & Fernandes, P. B. (2008). Executive coaching: It works! Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60, 78–90.10.1037/1065-9293.60.1.78Google Scholar
Kraiger, K. (2002). Decision-based evaluation. In Kraiger, K. (Ed.) Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development: State-of-the-art lessons for practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
McKenna, D. D., & Davis, S. L. (2009). Hidden in plain sight: The active ingredients of executive coaching. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 244–260.Google Scholar
Strupp, H. H., & Hadley, S. W. (1977). A tripartite model of mental health and therapeutic outcomes. American Psychologist, 32, 187–196.10.1037/0003-066X.32.3.187Google Scholar