Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:10:53.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing and Scaling Personality Measures: Thurstone Was Right—But So Far, Likert Was Not Wrong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Frederick L. Oswald  and
Kraig L. Schell
Frederick L. Oswald*
Affiliation:
Rice University
Kraig L. Schell
Affiliation:
Angelo State University
*
E-mail: foswald@rice.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, MS 25, Houston, TX 77005
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 481 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, Rice University

**

Department of Psychology and Social Work, Angelo State University.

References

Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, B. W. (2007). Constructing personality scores under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment, 19, 88–106. Google Scholar
Drasgow, F. L., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Stark, S. (2010). 75 years after Likert: Thurstone was right! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 465–476.Google Scholar
Goffin, R. D., Jelley, R. B., Powell, D. M., & Johnson, N. G. (2009). Taking advantage of social comparisons in performance appraisal: The relative percentile method. Human Resource Management, 48, 251–268. Google Scholar
Hernández, A., Drasgow, F., & González-Roma, V. (2004). Investigating the functioning of a middle category by means of a mixed-measurement model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 687–699. Google Scholar
Hogan, R. (1996). A socioanalytic perspective on the five-factor model. In Wiggins, J. S. (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 163–179). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121. Google Scholar
Kulas, J. T., & Stachowski, A. A. (2009). Middle category endorsement in odd-numbered Likert response scales: Associated item characteristics, cognitive demands, and preferred meanings. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 489–493. Google Scholar
Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157. Google Scholar
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268. Google Scholar
Oswald, F. L. (2010). Practical recommendations for trait-level estimation in the Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales (NCAPS). Millington, TN: Navy Personnel Research, Studies, and Technology. Google Scholar
Pitt, M. A., & Myung, I. J. (2002). When a good fit can be bad. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 421–425. Google Scholar
Preacher, K. (2006). Quantifying parsimony in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 227–259. Google Scholar
Roberts, J. S., Laughlin, J. E., & Wedell, D. H. (1999). Validity issues in the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 211–233. Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N., Izard, C. E., & Hollander, E. P. (1955). Middle category response: Reliability and relationship to personality and intelligence variables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 15, 281–290. Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517. Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1935). The vectors of the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar