Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:55:00.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence-Based I–O Psychology: What Do We Lose on the Way?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Catherine Cassell*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
*
E-mail: catherine.cassell@mbs.ac.uk, Address: Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Booth Street East, Manchester M15 6PB, United Kingdom

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, N. (1998). The people make the paradigm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 323328. Google Scholar
Austin, J. T., Scherbaum, C. A., & Mahlman, R. A. (2002). History of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology: Measurement, design, analysis. In Rogelberg, S. G. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Briner, R., & Rousseau, D. (2011). Evidence-based psychology: Not there yet. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspective on Science and Practice, 4, 322.Google Scholar
Bryman, A., Becker, S., & Sempik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 261276. Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 10621081. Google Scholar
Cassell, C. M., & Symon, G. (2006). Qualitative research in industrial and organizational psychology. In Hodgkinson, G. & Ford, J. K. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley. Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Gough, D. A., Kiwan, D., Sutcliffe, S., Simpson, D., & Houghton, N. (2003). A systematic map and synthesis review of the effectiveness of personal development planning for improved student learning. Retrieved from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/EPPIWebContent/reel/review_groups/EPPI/LTSN/LTSN_June03.pdf Google Scholar
Joyce, K., Pabayo, R., Critchley, J. A., & Bambra, C. (2010). Flexible working conditions and their effects on employee health and wellbeing. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2), Art. No. CD008009. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008009.pub2.Google Scholar
Learmonth, M. (2011). The relationship between evidence and theory in management research. In Cassell, C. M. & Lee, B. (Eds.), Challenges and controversies in management research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Learmonth, M., & Harding, N. (2006). Evidence-based management: The very idea. Public Administration, 84, 245266. Google Scholar
Leseure, M. J., Bauer, J., Birdi, K., Neely, A., & Denyer, D. (2005). Adoption of promising practices: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3–4, 169190. Google Scholar
Locke, K., & Golden-Biddle, K. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research: Its potential for industrial and organizational psychology. In Rogelberg, S. G. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Symon, G., & Cassell, C. M. (2006). Neglected perspectives in work and organizational psychology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 307314. Google Scholar