Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:48:50.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expanding the Vision of Industrial–Organizational Psychology Contributions to Environmental Sustainability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Cathy L. Z. Dubois  and
David A. Dubois
Cathy L. Z. Dubois*
Affiliation:
Kent State University
David A. Dubois
Affiliation:
The Social Design Group
*
E-mail: cdubois@kent.edu, Address: Management & Information Systems Department, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242-0001
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 480 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, developments, applications. New York, NY: Braziller. Google Scholar
Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8, 30–35. Google Scholar
D’Mello, S., Ones, D. S., Klein, R. M., Wiernik, B. M., & Dilchert, S. (2011, April). Green company rankings and reporting of pre-environmental efforts in organizations. Poster session presented at the 26th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
DuBois, C. L. Z. (2012). EcoVision at Sherwin-Williams: Leadership at all levels. In Jackson, S. E., Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (Eds.), Managing HR for Environmental Sustainability. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley. Google Scholar
DuBois, C. L. Z., & DuBois, D. A. (2012). Strategic human resource management for environmental sustainability in organizations. Human Resource Management, 51(6).Google Scholar
Gibbs & Soell (2011). Sense & Sustainability® Study: Perspectives on corporate sustainability among consumers and Fortune 1000 executives. Retrieved from http://www.gibbs-soell.com/home/pulse-check/2011-gibbs-soell-sense-sustainability-study/ Google Scholar
Hart, S. L., & Christensen, C. M. (2002). The great leap: Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 51–56. Google Scholar
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make competition irrelevant. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School. Google Scholar
Laszlo, C., & Zhexembayeva, N. (2011). Embedded sustainability: The next big competitive advantage. Sheffield, England: Greenleaf. Google Scholar
Mohrman, S. A., & Lawler, E. E. (2012). Generating knowledge that drives change. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 41–51. Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2012). Environmental sustainability at work: A call to action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 444–466.Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E. (2012). The psychology of competitive advantage: An adjacent possibility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 62–81.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77. Google Scholar
Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Johnson, D., Sandholtz, K., & Younger, J. (2008). HR competencies: Mastery at the intersection of people and business. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management. Google Scholar
Wishik, S. M., & VanDerVynckt, S. (1976). The use of nutritional “Positive Deviants” to identify approaches for modification of dietary practices. American Journal of Public Health, 66, 37–42. Google Scholar