We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Campbell, J. P. (2012). Behavior, performance, and effectiveness in the twenty-first century. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 159–196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In Schmitt, N., & Borman, W. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
LeBreton, J. M., Scherer, K. T., & James, L. R. (2014). Corrections for criterion reliability in validity generalization: A false prophet in a land of suspended judgment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(4), 478–500.Google Scholar
Mosier, C. I. (1943). On the reliability of a weighted composite. Psychometrika, 8, 161–168.Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 216–226.Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557–574.Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2005). Is there a general factor in job performance ratings? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 108–131.Google Scholar