Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:30:03.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is it Time to Voluntarily Turn Over Theories of Voluntary Turnover?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Craig J. Russell
Craig J. Russell*
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
*
E-mail: cruss@ou.edu, Address: Price College of Business, University of Oklahoma, 307 W. Brooks Drive, Norman, OK 73019
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current research literature on voluntary employee turnover exhibits at least four shortcomings: low predictive validity, excessive exuberance with predictors, low rigor, and little relevance. Existing theories of voluntary employee turnover research are under specified, as none contains the full range of variables originally hypothesized by March and Simon as contributing to individual employees' decisions to quit their jobs. March and Simon (1958) contributed to the current state of affairs by making at least one assumption that subsequent results do not support. Subsequent efforts to expand theory and to detect and integrate new explanatory constructs have led to a much deeper understanding of the same small portion of turnover variance explained in employee decisions to quit. Deficiencies in current approaches and what a nondeficient model of voluntary employee turnover might look like are described. Directions for future voluntary turnover research are identified, as are past trends that need to be discontinued.

Type
Focal Article
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 156 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashton, R., & Brown, P. (1980). Descriptive modeling of auditors' internal control judgments: Replication and extension. Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 1–15.Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R. & Zimmerman, R. D. (2005). Reducing voluntary, avoidable turnover through selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 159–166.Google Scholar
Bauer, T., & Erdogan, B. (2012). Organizational socialization outcomes: Now and into the future. In Wanberg, C. R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational socialization (pp. 97–112). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beach, L. R. (1990). Image theory: Decision making in personal and organizational contexts. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bolino, M. C., Harvey, J., & Bachrach, D. G. (2012). A self-regulation approach to understanding citizenship behavior in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 126–139.Google Scholar
Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217.Google Scholar
Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Carte, T. A., & Russell, C. J. (2003). In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27, 479–501.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (1976). Turnover, biographical data, and fair employment practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 576–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95–106.Google Scholar
Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., Heckman, D. R., Lee, T. W., Holtmon, B. C., & Harman, W. S. (2009). Turnover contagion: How coworker's' job embeddedness and job search behaviors influence quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 545–561.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (2012). Drive turnover down. HR Magazine, 57, 22–27.Google Scholar
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. M., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlated of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 180–190.Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R. & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 259–286.Google Scholar
Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hoffman, P. J. (1960). The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 116–131.Google Scholar
Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Eberly, M. B. (2008). Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 231–274.Google Scholar
Hom, P. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (1991). A structural equations modeling test of turnover theory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 350–366.Google Scholar
Hom, P. W., Mitchell, T., Lee, T. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (2012). Reviewing employee turnover: Focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 831–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, A., & Bray, D. W. (1988). Managerial lives in transition: Advancing age and changing times. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, K., Liu, D., McKay, P. F., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2012). When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1077–1096.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Wanberg, C. R., Glomb, T. M., & Ahlburg, D. (2005). The role of temporal shifts in turnover processes: It's about time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 644–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1994). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Review, 19, 51–89.Google Scholar
Lee, T. H., Gerhart, B., Weller, I., & Trevor, C. O. (2008). Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 651–671.Google Scholar
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., McDaniel, L. S., & Hill, J. W. (1999). The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 5–36.Google Scholar
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Wise, L., & Fireman, S. (1996). An unfolding model of employee voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 5–36.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1945). The Research Center for Group Dynamics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sociometry, 8, 126–136.Google Scholar
Lord, R. G., Diefendorff, J. M., Schmidt, A. M., & Hall, R. J. (2010). Self-regulation at work. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 543–568.Google Scholar
Maertz, C. P. Jr., & Campion, M. A. (2004). Profiles in quitting: Integrating process and content turnover theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 566–582.Google Scholar
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
McClelland, C. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Expectancy models of job satisfaction, occupational preference and effort: A theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1053–1077.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102–1121.Google Scholar
Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237–240.Google Scholar
Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493–522.Google Scholar
Mossholder, K. W., Settoon, R. P., & Henagan, S. C. (2005). A relational perspective on turnover: Examining structural, attitudinal, and behavioral predictors. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 607–618.Google Scholar
Mowen, J. C., & Gaeth, G. J. (1992). The evaluation stage in marketing decision making. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Spring, 177–188.Google Scholar
Muchinsky, P. M. (1985). Some new criterion variables for I/O psychology. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 23(1), 9–11.Google Scholar
Muchinsky, P. M., & Morrow, P. C. (1980). A multidisciplinary model of voluntary employee turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 263–290.Google Scholar
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1981). Professional turnover: The case of nurses. New York, NY: SP Medical & Scientific Books.Google Scholar
Russell, C. J. (2009). Establishing the usefulness of strategic management research: On inverted Lewinians and naked strategy scholars. In Ketchen, D., & Bergh, D. (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 5, pp. 55–74). Bingley, England: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Russell, C. J. (2010, August). The unfolding model of turnover, research design, and analysis choices: A Monte Carlo study. “Best paper” research methods division award winner presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Russell, C. J. (2011). Evidence-based human resources management. San Diego, CA: Cognella/University Readers.Google Scholar
Russell, C. J. (2012, April). Consequences of working at a job you want to quit: Voluntary turnover vs. involuntary employment. Presented at the annual meetings of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Russell, C. J., & Van Sell, M. (1986). Modeling individual differences in nursing turnover decision processes. Awarded the Ghiselli Award for Research Design by the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology at their meeting in Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Russell, C. J., & Van Sell, M. (2011). A closer look at decisions to quit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 125–137.Google Scholar
Schaubroeck, J., & Green, S. G. (1989). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for assessing change during organizational entry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 892–900.Google Scholar
Shaw, J., Delery, J., Jenkins, G., & Gupta, N. (1998). An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 511–525.Google Scholar
Steel, R. P. (2002). Turnover theory at the empirical interface: Problems of fit and function. Academy of Management Review, 27, 346–360.Google Scholar
Westaby, J. D. (2005). Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, 98, 97–120.Google Scholar