Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:42:28.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Links Among Bases of Validation Evidence: Absence of Empirical Evidence Is not Evidence of Absence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Dan J. Putka*
Affiliation:
Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO)
Rodney A. McCloy
Affiliation:
Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO)
Michael Ingerick
Affiliation:
Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO)
Patrick Gavan O’Shea
Affiliation:
Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO)
Deborah L. Whetzel
Affiliation:
Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO)
*
E-mail: dputka@humrro.org, Address: Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO), 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 700, Alexandria, VA 22314

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, W. Jr., & Villado, A. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435442.Google Scholar
Baydoun, R. B., & Neuman, G. A. (1992). The future of the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB) for use in public and private testing. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 8191.Google Scholar
Brown, K. G., Le, H., & Schmidt, F. L. (2006). Specific aptitude theory revisited: Is there incremental validity for training performance? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 87100.Google Scholar
Brown, S. H. (1978). Long-term validity of a personal history item scoring procedure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 673676.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., & Knapp, D. J. (Eds.). (2001). Exploring the limits in personnel selection and classification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In Schmitt, N. & Borman, W. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 3570). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Carrier, M. R., Dalessio, A. T., & Brown, S. H. (1990). Correspondence between estimates of content and criterion-related validity values. Personnel Psychology, 43, 85100.Google Scholar
Hartigan, J. A., & Wigdor, A. K. (1989). Fairness in employment testing: Validity generalization, minority issues, and the general aptitude test battery. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Levine, R., Huberman, M., & Wall, J. (1996). ASVAB career exploration program: Impact on students (DMDC Technical Report 96-006). Seaside, CA: Defense Manpower Data Center.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (2009). Content validation is useful for many things, but validity isn't one of them. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 453464.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (1995). Evaluation of the U.S. Employment Service's workplan for the GATB improvement project. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Putka, D. J., & Sackett, P. R. (in press). Reliability and validity. In Farr, J. L. & Tippins, N. T. (Eds.). Handbook of employee selection. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar