Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:43:50.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motor Oil or Snake Oil: Synthetic Validity Is a Tool Not a Panacea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Robert J. Harvey
Robert J. Harvey*
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech
*
E-mail: harveyrj@vt.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0436.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The focal article (Johnson et al., 2010) provides a highly upbeat assessment regarding the potential for job component validation (JCV) and J-coefficient methods to “substantially advance the science and practice of industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology through synthetic validity” (emphasis added). It follows on the heels of earlier, similarly enthusiastic endorsements (Jeanneret, 1992; Jeanneret & Strong, 2003; LaPolice, Carter, & Johnson, 2008). For example, LaPolice et al. claimed that the JCV Rs they obtained “are all very close to the maximum correlation for each dependent variable, suggesting that our models are approaching the best possible prediction” (p. 435, emphasis added).

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 351 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fleishman, E. A., Wetrogan, L. I., Uhlman, C. E., & Marshall-Mies, J. C. (1995). Abilities. In Development of prototype occupational analysis network (O*NET) content model: Volume I: Report. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah Department of Employment Security.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. J. (2009). O*NET job-component validation (JCV) Rs > .80 do not guarantee consequential validity . Unpublished manuscript.+.80+do+not+guarantee+consequential+validity+.+Unpublished+manuscript.>Google Scholar
Harvey, R. J., & Hollander, E. (2002, April). Assessing interrater agreement in the O*NET. In Wilson, M. A. (Chair), The O*NET: Mend it, or end it? Symposium presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. J., & Wilson, M. A. (2010, April). Discriminant validity concerns with the O*NET holistic rating scales . Paper presented at the 25th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219–229.Google Scholar
Jeanneret, P. R. (1992). Applications of job component/synthetic validity to construct validity. Human Performance, 5, 81–96.Google Scholar
Jeanneret, P. R., & Strong, M. H. (2003). Linking O*NET job analysis information to job require predictors: An O*NET application. Personnel Psychology, 56, 465–492.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. W., Steel, P., Scherbaum, C. A., Hoffman, C. C., Jeanneret, P. R., & Foster, J. (2010). Validation is like motor oil: Synthetic is better. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 305–328.Google Scholar
LaPolice, C. C., Carter, G. W., & Johnson, J. W. (2008). Linking O*NET descriptors to occupational literacy requirements using job component validation. Personnel Psychology, 61, 405–441.Google Scholar
Snake Oil (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2010, from www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_oil.Google Scholar
Wagner, T. A., & Harvey, R. J. (2004, April). Job-component validation using CMQ and O*NET: Assessing the additivity assumption . Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago.Google Scholar