Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-28T04:59:05.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moving the boundaries of I-O, or of work itself?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2023

Ishbel McWha-Hermann Open the ORCID record for Ishbel McWha-Hermann [Opens in a new window] ,
Ines Meyer ,
Stuart C. Carr  and
Rosalind Searle
Ishbel McWha-Hermann*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Ines Meyer
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Stuart C. Carr
Affiliation:
Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand
Rosalind Searle
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
*
Corresponding author: Ishbel McWha-Hermann; Email: Ishbel.McWha@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 2023 , pp. 504 - 507
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aust, I., Matthews, B., & Muller-Camen, M. (2020). Common good HRM: A paradigm shift in sustainable HRM? Human. Resource Management, 30(3), 100705.Google Scholar
Blustein, D. L., & Flores, L. Y. (Eds.) (2023). Rethinking work: Essays on building a better workplace. Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blustein, D. L., Olle, C., Connors-Kellgren, A., & Diamonti, A. J. (2016). Decent work: A psychological perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, S. C. (2023, May). Closing plenary keynote. In What makes a livelihood sustainable? EAWOP (European Association of Work and Organisational Psychology).Google Scholar
Carr, S. C., Hodgetts, D. J., Potgieter, J., & Meyer, I. (2021). Macropsychology for decent work: Sustainable livelihood. In Macropsychology: A population science for sustainable development goals (pp. 213–231). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, S. C., Hopner, V., Hodgetts, D., & Young, M. (Eds.) (2023). Tackling precarious work: Toward sustainable livelihoods. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, S. C., MacLachlan, M., & Furnham, A. (Eds.) (2012). Humanitarian work psychology. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiFabio, A. (2017). The psychology of sustainability and sustainable development for well-being in organizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elley-Brown, M. J., & Pringle, J. K. (2021). Sorge, Heideggerian ethic of care: Creating more caring organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, T., Pais, L., Rebelo Dos Santos, N., & Moreira, J. M. (2018). The Decent Work Questionnaire: Development and validation in two samples of knowledge workers. International Labour Review, 157(2), 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haar, J., Carr, S. C., Arrowsmith, J., Parker, J., Hodgetts, D., & Alefaio-Tugia, S. (2018). Escape from working poverty: Steps toward sustainable livelihood. Sustainability, 10(11), 4144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Office (ILO). (2012). From precarious work to decent work: Outcome document to the workers’ symposium on policies and regulations to combat precarious employment. International Labour Office; Bureau for Workers' Activities.Google Scholar
International Labour Office (ILO). (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook 2021: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. Author.Google Scholar
International Labour Office (ILO). (2022). Setting adequate wages: The question of living wages. Author.Google Scholar
Limki, R. (2018). On the coloniality of work: Commercial surrogacy in India. Gender, Work & Organization, 25(4), 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWha-Hermann, I., Maynard, D. C., & Berry, M. O. N. (Eds.) (2015). Humanitarian work psychology and the global development agenda: Case studies and interventions. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, M., & Olson-Buchanan, J. (2023). Moving boundaries on what I-O has been and what I-O can be: The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals as an organizing framework. Industrial-Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson-Buchanan, J. B., Bryan, L. L. K., & Thompson, L. F. (Eds.) (2013). Using industrial-organizational psychology for the greater good: Helping those who help others. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2023a). Informality and globalisation: In search of a new social contract. Author.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2023b). 21st-century governance. Author.Google Scholar
Reichman, W. (Ed.) (2014). Industrial and organizational psychology help the vulnerable: Serving the underserved. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, A., Schafheitle, S., & van der Werff, L. (2023). Smart tech is all around us—bridging employee vulnerability with organizational active trust-building. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12940 CrossRefGoogle Scholar