Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:24:31.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Era of Large-Scale Data Sharing: A Test Publisher's Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

John W. Jones
Affiliation:
Vangent, A General Dynamics Company
Kelly D. Dages*
Affiliation:
Vangent, A General Dynamics Company
*
E-mail: kelly.dages@gdit.comAddress: Vangent, A General Dynamics Company, 1 North Dearborn Street, Suite 1150, Chicago, IL 60602

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dages, K. D., Ones, D., Jones, J. W., Sackett, P., Barrett, G., & Brasher, E. (2013, April). Five perspectives on sharing data for large scale meta-analyses. Panel discussion at the 2013 Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology Annual Conference, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
Harris, W. G., Jones, J. W., Klion, R., Arnold, D. W., Camara, W., & Cunningham, M. R. (2012). Test publisher perspective on “An Updated Meta-analysis”: Comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 531536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepes, S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). How trustworthy is the scientific literature in I-O psychology? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6(3), 252268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, A. & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012, October 1). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/2012/10/big-data-the-management-revolution/ar/1Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 679703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Raymark, P. H., & Odle-Dusseau, H. N. (2012). The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 499530.Google Scholar