Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:54:08.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partnerships in Leading for Innovation: A Dyadic Model of Collective Leadership

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Samuel T. Hunter ,
Lily Cushenbery ,
Joshua Fairchild  and
Jazmine Boatman
Samuel T. Hunter*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Lily Cushenbery
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Joshua Fairchild
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Jazmine Boatman
Affiliation:
Development Dimensions International
*
E-mail: samhunter@psu.edu, Address: Industrial & Organizational Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, 111 Moore Building, State College, PA 16802
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 424 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235–258. Google Scholar
Baughman, W. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1995). Process-analytic models of creative capacities: Operations influencing the combination-and-reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 37–62. Google Scholar
Bledow, R., Frese, M., & Mueller, V. (2011). Ambidexterous leadership for innovation: The influence of culture. In Mobley, W. H., Li, M., & Wang, Y. (Eds.), Advances in global leadership: Vol. 6, (pp. 41–69). Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing. Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309. Google Scholar
Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Ruark, G. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 933–958. Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (1995). Groves and Oppenheimer: The story of a partnership. The Antioch Review, 53, 482–493. Google Scholar
Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. (2011). Leading for innovation: Direct and indirect influences. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13, 248–265. Google Scholar
Hunter, S. T., Thoroughgood, C. N., Myer, A. T., & Ligon, G. S. (2011). Paradoxes of leading innovative endeavors: Summary, solutions, and future directions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 54–66. Google Scholar
Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve Jobs. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar
Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 2, 325–340. Google Scholar
Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794–813. Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1975). The manager's job: Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review, 53, 100–110. Google Scholar
Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 229–240. Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D. (2006). Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Press. Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., & Hunter, S. T. (2005). Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective on creativity. In Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds.), Research on multi-level issues: Volume IV (pp. 11–74). Oxford, England: Elsevier. Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Hunter, S. T., Eubanks, D. E., Bedell, K. E., & Murphy, S. T. (2007). Developing leaders for creative efforts: A domain-based approach to leadership development. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 402–417.Google Scholar
O’Connor, G. C. (1998). Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 151–166. Google Scholar
Rigby, D. K., Gruver, K., & Allen, J. (2009). Innovation in turbulent times. Harvard Business Review, 87, 79–86. Google Scholar
West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355–424. Google Scholar
Yammarino, F. J., Salas, E., Serban, A., Shirreffs, K., & Shuffler, M. L. (2012). Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the “we” in leadership science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 382–402. Google Scholar