Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:14:50.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Psychology of Corporate Social Responsibility and Humanitarian Work: A Person-Centric Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Deborah E. Rupp ,
Daniel Skarlicki  and
Ruodan Shao
Deborah E. Rupp*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Daniel Skarlicki
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Ruodan Shao
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
*
E-mail: ruppd@purdue.edu, Address: Department of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2081
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The field of industrial–organizational (I–O) psychology has and will continue to experience periods of growth and change. Our field has shifted and transformed along with society, through the industrial revolution, the human relations movement, the globalization of business, and the information age. And here we are, in 2013, at the cusp of what seems to be the beginning of a new stage in our development, this time evidenced by the marked attention that both the science and practice arms of I–O psychology are placing on issues of corporate social responsibility (CSR, Aguinis, 2011; Cruse, 2010; Scott et al. 2013)

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 361 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267–299). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 855–879). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2013). Embedded versus peripheral corporate social responsibility: Psychological foundations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6(4), 314–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. I. I. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.Google Scholar
Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2001). How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 52–59.Google Scholar
Atkins, S. G., & Thompson, L. F. (2012). Online volunteers and smart aid. In Carr, S. C., MacLachlan, M., & Furnham, A. (Eds.), Humanitarian work psychology (pp. 266–292). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, M., Reichman, W., MacLachlan, M., Klobas, J., Hui, H. C., & Carr, S. C. (2011). Humanitarian work psychology: The contributions of organizational psychology to poverty reduction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2005). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701–1719.Google Scholar
Carr, S. C., MacLachlan, M., & Furnham, A. (Eds.) (2012). Humanitarian work psychology. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 164–209.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Chrobot-Mason, D., Rupp, D. E., & Prehar, C. (2004). Accountability for corporate injustice. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 107–133.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Mohler, C. J., & Schminke, M. (2001). Three roads to organizational justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 1–113.Google Scholar
Cruse, S. (2010). Corporate social responsibility has gone global: The UN global compact. Pro-Social I-O-Quo Vadis? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 48(2), 99–102.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In Dienstbier, R. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.Google Scholar
Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate social responsibility programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.Google Scholar
Evans, W. R., & Davis, W. D. (2011). An examination of perceived corporate citizenship, job applicant attraction, and CSR work role definition. Business and Society, 50(3), 456–480.Google Scholar
Folger, R. (1998). Fairness as a moral virtue. In Schminke, M. (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (pp. 12–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In Gilliland, S., Steiner, D. D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.), Research in social issues in management (pp. 3–31). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1–55). Lexington, MA: New Lexington.Google Scholar
Frankental, P. (2001). Corporate social responsibility—A PR invention. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(1), 18–23.Google Scholar
Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, R. L., Folger, R., & Ford, R. (2011). Moral contracts. In Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on organizational justice and ethics. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business Society, 39(3), 254–280.Google Scholar
Gully, S. M., Phillips, J. M., Castellano, W. G., Han, K., & Kim, A. (in press). A mediated moderation model of recruiting socially and environmentally responsible job applicants. Personnel Psychology.Google Scholar
Guo, J., Rupp, D. R., Weiss, H. M., & Trougakos, J. P. (2011). Justice in organizations: A person-centric approach. In Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on organizational justice and ethics (Vol. 7, pp. 3–32). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
Hansen, S. S., Dunford, B., Boss, A., Boss, R. R., & Angermeier, I. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and the benefits of employee trust: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 29–45.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: International cooperation and its importance for survival (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The globe study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Huffman, A. H., & Klein, S. R. (2013). Green organizations: Driving change with I-O psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
International Labor Organization. (2013). World report on child labour: Economic vulnerability, social protection and the fight against child labour. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/washington/WCMS_178184/lang--en/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. E., Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2012). Managing human resources for environmental sustainability. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Jones, D. A., Willness, C., & Madey, S. (in press). Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal.Google Scholar
Kim, H., Lee, M., Lee, H., & Kim, N. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 557–569.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2010). Can professions contribute to the reduction of world-wide poverty? A case in point: Organizational psychology and pay diversity. International Journal of Psychology, 45(5), 371–375.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2012). From humanitarian to humanistic work psychology: The morality of business. In Carr, S. C., MacLachlan, M., & Furnham, A. (Eds.), Humanitarian work psychology (pp. 103–128). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Liao, H., & Rupp, D. E. (2005). The impact of justice climate, climate strength, and justice orientation on work outcomes: A multilevel-multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, S., & Phillips, J. (2008). Embedding CSR values: The global footwear industry's evolving governance structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 143–156.Google Scholar
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, J., & Aquino, K. (2011). A model of third parties' morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Academy of Manage Review, 36(3), 526–543.Google Scholar
Ormiston, M., & Wong, E. M. (in press). License to ill: The effects of corporate social responsibility and CEO moral identity on corporate irresponsibility. Personnel Psychology.Google Scholar
Olson-Buchanan, J. B., Bryan, L. L. K., & Thompson, L. F. (2013). Using industrial organizational psychology for the greater good: Helping those who help others. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
Pandey, N., Rupp, D. E., & Thornton, M. (2013). The morality of corporate environment sustainability: A psychological and philosophical perspective. In Huffman, A. H., & Klein, S. R. (Eds.), Green organizations: Driving change with I-O psychology (pp. 69–92). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business and Society, 43(3), 296–319.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E. (2011). An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(1), 72–94.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537–543.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Skarlicki, D. P., Paddock, E. L., Kim, T. Y., & Nadisic, T. (2013, August). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The role of self-autonomy and individualism. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Orlando, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Thornton, M. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (in press). Applicants' and employees' reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psychology.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., & Williams, C. A. (2011). The efficacy of regulation as a function of psychological fit: Reexamining the hard law/soft law continuum. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 12, 581–602.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Aguilera, R. V. (2011). Increasing corporate social responsibility through stakeholder value internalization (and the catalyzing effect of new governance): An application of organizational justice, self-determination, and social influence theories. In Schminke, M. (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Managing the psychology of morality (pp. 71–90). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.Google Scholar
Schlösser, O., Frese, M., Heintze, A. M., Al-Najjar, M., Arciszewski, T., Besevegis, E., … & Zhang, K. (2013). Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: A validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(4), 535–551.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (2011). SIOP granted NGO status with the United Nations. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 49, 111–113.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C., Aguinis, H., McWha, I., Rupp, D. E., Thompson, L. F., & Cruse, S. (2013). News from the SIOP-United Nations team: SIOP has joined the global compact and so can you! The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 50(4), 65–68.Google Scholar
Skarlicki, D. P., & Kulik, C. T. (2005). Third-party reactions to employee (mis)treatment: A justice perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 183–229.Google Scholar
Sun, W., Stewart, J., & Pollard, D. (2010). Reframing corporate social responsibility: Lessons from the global financial crisis. Bingley, England: Emerald.Google Scholar
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.Google Scholar
Turillo, C. J., Folger, R., Lavelle, J. J., Umphress, E. E., & Gee, J. O. (2002). Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 839–865.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2010). Experiencing work: An essay on a person-centric work psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(1), 83–97.Google Scholar