Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:52:11.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recommendation: Add a competency on diversity and inclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2020

Sin-Ning Cindy Liu Open the ORCID record for Sin-Ning Cindy Liu [Opens in a new window] ,
Mindy E. Bergman Open the ORCID record for Mindy E. Bergman [Opens in a new window]  and
Theresa R. Hernandez
Sin-Ning Cindy Liu*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Mindy E. Bergman
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Theresa R. Hernandez
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: sinning.cindy.liu@tamu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 84 - 89
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Definitions related to sexual orientation and gender diversity in APA documents. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/sexuality-definitions.pdf.Google Scholar
Bergman, M. E. (2018). Police shootings and race in the United States: Why the perpetrator predation perspective is essential to IO psychology’s role in ending this crisis. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(1), 151–157.10.1017/iop.2017.101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, M. E., & Jean, V. A. (2016). Where have all the “workers” gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial-organizational psychology literature. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 84–113.10.1017/iop.2015.70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019). Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population 25 years and over by educational attainment, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat07.pdf.Google Scholar
Capell, B., Tzafrir, S. S., & Dolan, S. L. (2016). The disclosure of concealable stigmas: Analysis anchored in trust. Cogent Psychology, 3, 1121066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clair, J. A., Beatty, J. E., & MacLean, T. L. (2005). Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 30, 78–95.10.5465/amr.2005.15281431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colella, A., Hebl, M., & King, E. (2017). One hundred years of discrimination research in the Journal of Applied Psychology: A sobering synopsis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 500–513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Follmer, K. B., Sabat, I. E., & Siuta, R. L. (2020). Disclosure of stigmatized identities at work: An interdisciplinary review and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(2), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.10.1017/S0140525X0999152XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holroyd, J., Scaife, R., & Stafford, T. (2017). Responsibility for implicit bias. Philosophy Compass, 12, e12410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medical Journal, 35, 323–324.Google ScholarPubMed
Jordan, T. H. (2011). Moving from diversity to inclusion. Profiles in Diversity Journal. Retrieved from http://www.diversityjournal.com/1471-moving-from-diversity-to-inclusion/Google Scholar
Kezar, A. (2002). Reconstructing static images of leadership: An application of positionality theory. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8, 94–109.10.1177/107179190200800308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, E. B., Avery, D. R., Hebl, M. R., & Cortina, J. M. (2018). Systematic subjectivity: How subtle biases infect the scholarship review process. Journal of Management, 44, 843–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, T., González-Morales, M. G., Banks, G. C., O’Boyle, E., Allen, J. A., Sinha, R., … Gulick, L. M. V. (2020). Supporting robust, rigorous, and reliable reviewing as the cornerstone of our profession: Introducing a competency framework for peer review. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, C. G. (2016). Where in the world are the workers? Cultural underrepresentation in IO research. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabat, I. E., Lindsey, A. P., King, E. B., Ahmad, A. S., Membere, A., & Arena, D. F. (2017). How prior knowledge of LGB identities alters the effects of workplace disclosure. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 103, 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, G. M., & Ross-Sheriff, F. (2008). Identity, oppression, and power: Feminisms and intersectionality theory. Journal of Women and Social Work, 23, 5–9.10.1177/0886109907310475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, R. M., Howe, J., Beazer, J., & Carr, T. (In press). Ethics and positionality in qualitative research with vulnerable and marginal groups. Qualitative Research. doi: 10.1177/1468794119841839.Google Scholar
Thurairajah, K. (2019). Uncloaking the researcher: Boundaries in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 15, 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar