Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:20:26.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sounds of Silence: A Perspective on Applied Research on Organizational Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Mark Somers
Mark Somers*
Affiliation:
New Jersey Institute of Technology and Rutgers Business School
*
E-mail: Somers@adm.njit.edu, Address: New Jersey Institute of Technology and Rutgers Business School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 215 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Greenberg, J. (2009). Everybody talks about organizational justice, but nobody does anything about it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 181–195.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2008). To prosper organizational psychology should … expand the value of organizational psychology to match the quality of its ethics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 439–453.Google Scholar
Milliken, F. J. Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. E. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1453–1476.Google Scholar
Near, J., & Miceli, M. (1986). Retaliation against whistle-blowers: Predictors and effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 137–145.Google Scholar