Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:55:19.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What We Don't Know About Justice: Behaviors and Bridging the Scientist–Practitioner Gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Zinta S. Byrne*
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
*
E-mail: Zinta.Byrne@colostate.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 4355.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. E. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should … bridge application and scholarship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 455468.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validity of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386400.Google Scholar
Elkins, T. J., Bozeman, D. P., & Phillips, J. S. (2003). Promotion decisions in an affirmative action environment: Can social accounts change fairness perceptions? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 11111139.Google Scholar
Finkel, N. J. (2000). But it's not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 898952.10.1037/1076-8971.6.4.898Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (2006). Losing sleep over organizational injustice: Attenuating insomniac reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 5869.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (2009). Everybody talks about organizational justice, but nobody does anything about it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice 2, 181195.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G. (2008). Landy is correct: Stereotyping can be moderated by individuating the out-group and by being accountable. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 430435.Google Scholar
Halfhill, T. R., Huff, J. W., Johnson, D. A., Ballentine, R. D., & Beyerlein, M. M. (2002). Interventions that work (and some that don't): An executive summary of the organizational change literature. In Lowman, R. L. (Ed.), The California school of organizational studies handbook of organizational consulting psychology: A comprehensive guide to theory, skills, and techniques (pp. 619644). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should … expand the values of organizational psychology to match the quality of its ethics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 439453.Google Scholar
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Gergen, K., Greenberg, M., & Willis, R. (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 2755). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Mikula, G., Petri, B., & Tanzer, N. (1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 133149.Google Scholar
Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. (1996). Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 161169.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. S. (2001). Reflections on fairness: Continuing the progression of justice research and practice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 243253.Google Scholar
Van den Bos, K. (2001). Fundamental research by means of laboratory experiments is essential for a better understanding of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 254259.Google Scholar