Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:12:54.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When training backfires and what can be done about it

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2019

Logan M. Steele*
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Joseph A. Vandello
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
*
*Corresponding author. Email: steele.logan.m@gmail.com

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banyard, V. L., Plante, E. G., & Moynihan, M. M. (2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 6179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, S. G., & Scherer, L. L. (2001). The unexpected effects of a sexual harassment educational program. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37, 125153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowes-Sperry, L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2005). To act or not to act: The dilemma faced by sexual harassment observers. Academy of Management Review, 30, 288306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulgarella, C. (2018, October 18). What happens when women stop protecting me: Understanding the #MeToo’s backlash. Forbes.com. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/caterinabulgarella/2018/10/18/what-happens-when-women-stop-protecting-men-understanding-the-metoos-backlash/#62709ec12088 Google Scholar
Cares, A. C., Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., Williams, L. M., Potter, S. J., & Stapleton, J. G. (2015). Changing attitudes about being a bystander to violence: Translating an in-person sexual violence prevention program to a new campus. Violence Against Women, 21, 165187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, G. L., Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2000). When beliefs yield to evidence: Reducing biased evaluation by affirming the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 11511164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014). The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 333371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., Hsu, L., McGoey, M., & Ross, L. (2007). Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 415430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Critcher, C. R., Dunning, D., & Armor, D. A. (2010). When self-affirmations reduce defensiveness: Timing is key. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 947959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2017, November). Training programs and reporting systems won’t end sexual harassment. Promoting women will. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/11/training-programs-and-reporting-systems-wont-end-sexual-harassment-promoting-more-women-will Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124, 689719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, L. M. (in press). Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Measuring the #MeToo backlash. (2018, October 20). Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/united-states/2018/10/20/measuring-the-metoo-backlash Google Scholar
Medeiros, K., & Griffith, J. (2019). #Ustoo: How I-O psychologists can extend the conversation on sexual harassment and sexual assault through workplace training. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(1), 119.Google Scholar
Petriglieri, J. L. (2011). Under threat: Responses to and the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities. Academy of Management Review, 36, 641662.Google Scholar
Potter, S. J., & Moynihan, M. M. (2011). Bringing in the bystander in-person prevention program to a US military installation: Results from a pilot study. Military Medicine, 176, 870875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawski, S. L. (2016). Understanding employees’ reactions to sexual harassment training: Interactional disruptions, identity threats, and negative training outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.Google Scholar
Rawski, S. L., & Workman-Stark, A. L. (2018). Masculinity contest cultures in policing organizations and recommendations for training interventions. Journal of Social Issues, 74, 607627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 183242). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, D. A. K., Nelson, L. D., & Steele, C. M. (2000). Do messages about health risks threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 10461058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, D. K., & Hartson, K. A. (2011). Reconciling self-protection with self-improvement: Self-affirmation theory. In Alicke, M., and Sedikides, C. (Eds.), The handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp. 128151). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261302). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tinkler, J. E. (2012). Resisting the enforcement of sexual harassment law. Law & Social Inquiry, 37, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinkler, J. E. (2013). How do sexual harassment policies shape gender beliefs? An exploration of the moderating effects of norm adherence and gender. Social Science Research, 42, 12691283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinkler, J. E., Li, Y. E., & Mollborn, S. (2007). Can legal interventions change beliefs? The effect of exposure to sexual harassment policy on men’s gender beliefs. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 480494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar