Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:45:56.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Winning the HRM Evidence-Based Impact Award—Lessons Learned: A Conversation With Key Stakeholders to the Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2017

William A. Schiemann  and
Jerry H. Seibert
William A. Schiemann*
Affiliation:
Metrus Group
Jerry H. Seibert
Affiliation:
Metrus Group
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to William Schiemann, Metrus Group, 953 Route 202 N., Somerville, NJ 08876. E-mail: wschiemann@metrus.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) and its Foundation have increasingly focused on linking science to practice, and to that end have partnered with Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) and its Foundation to create the Human Resource Management (HRM) Impact Award for firms demonstrating great practices in evidence-based human capital and management practices. Jack in the Box, the 2016 winner of this award, was so honored because of its integration of surveys and analytic models with leadership practices to understand, predict, and manage the right people drivers of important business outcomes. Instead of a research paper, we have chosen to share their story through conversational interview questions with the various stakeholders who contributed to the journey leading to the award and, in so doing, provide key lessons for others wishing to increase the impact of human capital in their organizations.

Type
Practice Forum
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 314 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blankenship, M. (2015). The future of HR: Will you be ready, willing and able to lead? In Ulrich, D., Schiemann, W., and Sartain, L., (Eds.), The rise of HR: Wisdom from 73 thought leaders (pp. 347–352). Alexandria, VA: HR Certification Institute.Google Scholar
Blankenship, M., Cetti, C., & Schultz, P. (1999, May). New approaches to people measurement. Presented at the Conference Board Performance Measurement Conference, New York.Google Scholar
Borg, I., Groenen, P., Bilsky, W., Jehn, K., & Schwartz, S. (2010, April). Embedding the organizational culture profile into a universal value theory. Poster presented at the 25th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Burke, W., & Litwin, G. (1992). A causal model of organisation performance and change. Journal of Management, 18 (3), 523–545.Google Scholar
Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review, 72 (2), 164–174.Google Scholar
Kostman, J. T., & Schiemann, W. A. (2005, May). People equity: The hidden driver of quality. Quality Progress, 37–42.Google Scholar
Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1997). Competing by design: The power of organizational architecture. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiemann, W. A. (2009). Reinventing talent management: How to maximize performance in the new marketplace. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Google Scholar
Schiemann, W. A. (2012). The ACE advantage: How smart companies unleash talent for optimal performance. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
Schiemann, W. A. (2016). Fulfilled! Critical choices: Work, home, life. Salisbury, MD: Secant Publishing.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar