Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-zc66z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-03T19:26:03.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ditching the defaults: Assessing the impact of default duration removal on antibiotic prescriptions originating in the emergency department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2025

Amy L. Van Abel*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Ryan W. Stevens
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Sara Ausman
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI, USA
Kellie Arensman Hannan
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Dan Ilges
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
Kirstin Kooda
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Sarah Lessard
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic Health System, Lacrosse, WI, USA
Courtney M. Willis
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
Christina G. Rivera
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Kelsey Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic Health System, Austin, MN, USA
*
Corresponding author: Amy L. Van Abel; Email: VanAbel.Amy@mayo.edu

Abstract

Reducing antimicrobial exposure by limiting the duration of therapy is an effective antimicrobial stewardship strategy. In this article, we describe the impact of modification of the electronic health record to remove default durations of therapy on ambulatory antibiotic prescriptions issued from emergency departments in a large, multicenter health system.

Type
Concise Communication
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Duffy, E, Ritchie, S, Metcalfe, S, Van Bakel, B, Thomas, MG. Antibacterials dispensed in the community comprise 85%-95% of total human antibacterial consumption. J Clin Pharm 2018;43:5964.Google ScholarPubMed
Sanchez, GV, Fleming-Dutra, KE, Roberts, RM, Hicks, LA. Core elements of outpatient antibiotic stewardship. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65:112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naghavi, M, Vollset, SE, Ikuta, KS, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet 2024;404:11991226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spellberg, B. The new antibiotic mantra—“shorter is better”. JAMA internal medicine, 2016;176:12541255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCormick, JZ, Cardwell, SM, Wheelock, C, Wong, CM, Vander Weide, LA. Impact of ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship on prescribing patterns for urinary tract infections. J Clin Pharm Ther 2020;45:13121319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrenn, RH, Slaton, CN, Diez, T, et al. The devil’s in the defaults: an interrupted time-series analysis of the impact of default duration elimination on exposure to fluoroquinolone therapy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2024;45:733739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jia, J, Linder, JA. Default nudges in medicine—designing the right choice. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e222437e222437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jachimowicz, JM, Duncan, S, Weber, EU, Johnson, EJ. When and why defaults influence decisions: A meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy 2019;3:159186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilges, D, Jensen, K, Draper, E, et al. Evaluation of multisite programmatic bundle to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections: A retrospective cohort study. In Open Forum Infect Dis 2023;45:550552.Google Scholar
Stevens, RW, Manz, J, Mathre, M, et al. Cracking the code (s): Optimization of encounter-level diagnosis coding to inform outpatient antimicrobial stewardship data modeling. Infect Control Hospital Epidemiol 2024;45:550552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Van Abel et al. supplementary material

Van Abel et al. supplementary material
Download Van Abel et al. supplementary material(File)
File 20.7 KB