Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:03:16.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of Bacteria-Controlled Nursing Units in Preventing Cross-Colonization With Resistant Bacteria in Severely Burned Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Joan M. Weber
Affiliation:
Shriners Burns Hospitals, Sumner Redstone Burn Center, and the Surgery Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Robert L. Sheridan
Affiliation:
Shriners Burn Hospitals, Sumner Redstone Burn Center, and the Surgery Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
John T. Schulz
Affiliation:
Shriners Burn Hospitals, Sumner Redstone Burn Center, and the Surgery Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Ronald G. Tompkins
Affiliation:
Shriners Burn Hospitals, Sumner Redstone Burn Center, and the Surgery Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Colleen M. Ryan*
Affiliation:
Shriners Burn Hospitals, Sumner Redstone Burn Center, and the Surgery Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Bigelow 1302, Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114

Abstract

Bacteria-controlled nursing units (BCNUs) are laminar air-flow patient isolation units. The rate of cross-colonization with resistant organisms in 66 critically ill pediatric burn patients with massive open wounds and ventilators housed in BCNUs during 5 years was examined and found to be extremely low (3.2 cases per 1,000 patient-days)

Type
Concise Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Falk, PS, Winnike, J, Woodmansee, C, Desai, M, Mayhall, CG. Outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a burn unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:575582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Burke, JF, Quinby, WC, Bondoc, CC, Sheehy, EM, Moreno, HC. The contribution of a bacterially isolated environment to the prevention of infection in seriously burned patients. Ann Surg 1977;186:377387.Google Scholar
3.Sheridan, RL, Ryan, CM, Petras, L, Lydon, M, Weber, J, Tompkins, RG. Burns in children younger than two years of age: an experience with 200 consecutive admissions. Pediatrics 1997;100:721723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Berthelot, P, Grattard, F, Mahul, P, et al. Prospective study of nosocomial colonization and infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:503512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Becker, WK, Cioffi, WG, McManus, AT, et al. Fungal burn wound infection: a 10-year experience. Arch Surg 1991;126:4448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Weber, JM. Epidemiology of infections and strategies for control. In: Carrougher, GJ, ed. Epidemiology of Infections and Strategies for Control in Burn Care and Therapy. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1998:191.Google Scholar
7.Montecalvo, MA, Jarvis, WR, Uman, J, et al. Infection-control measures reduce transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in an endemic setting. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:269272.Google Scholar
8.Austin, DJ, Bonten, MJ, Weinstein, RA, Slaughter, S, Anderson, RM. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci in intensive-care hospital settings: transmission dynamics, persistence, and the impact of infection control programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:69086913.Google Scholar