Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-r4mrb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-04T04:31:40.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of a Pulsed-Xenon Ultraviolet Room Disinfection Device for Impact on Hospital Operations and Microbial Reduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Mark Stibich ,
Julie Stachowiak ,
Benjamin Tanner ,
Matthew Berkheiser ,
Linette Moore ,
Issam Raad  and
Roy F. Chemaly
Mark Stibich*
Affiliation:
Xenex Healthcare Services, Austin, Texas
Julie Stachowiak
Affiliation:
Xenex Healthcare Services, Austin, Texas
Benjamin Tanner
Affiliation:
Antimicrobial Test Laboratories, Round Rock, Texas
Matthew Berkheiser
Affiliation:
Environmental Health and Safety, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Linette Moore
Affiliation:
Environmental Health and Safety, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Issam Raad
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Roy F. Chemaly
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
*
1250 South Capital of Texas Highway, Austin, TX 78746 (mark.stibich@xenex.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study evaluated the use of pulsed-xenon ultraviolet (PX-UV) room disinfection by sampling frequently touched surfaces in vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) isolation rooms. The PX-UV system showed a statistically significant reduction in microbial load and eliminated VRE on sampled surfaces when using a 12-minute multiposition treatment cycle.

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , March 2011 , pp. 286 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Carling, PC, Von Beheren, S, Kim, P, Woods, C. Intensive care unit environmental cleaning: an evaluation in sixteen hospitals using a novel assessment tool. J Hosp Infec 2008;68(1):39–44.Google Scholar
2.Huang, SS, Datta, R, Platt, R. Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants. Arch Intern Med 2006;166(18):1945–1951.Google Scholar
3.Drees, M, Snydman, DR, Schmid, CH, et al.Prior environmental contamination increases the risk of acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46(5):678–685.Google Scholar
4.Eckstein, BC, Adams, DA, Eckstein, EC, Sethi, AK, Yadavalli, G, Donskey, GJ. Reduction of Clostridium difficile and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus contamination of environmental surfaces after an intervention to improve cleaning methods. BMC Infect Dis 2007;7:61.Google Scholar
5.Mayfield, JL, Leet, T, Miller, J, Mundy, LM. Environmental control to reduce transmission of Clostridium difficile. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31(4):995–1000.Google Scholar
6.Wener, K, Willey, S, Eyre-Kelly, J, Duncan, R. Reduction in nosocomial Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates after terminal hypochlorite room cleaning. In: Program and abstracts of the Fifth Decennial International Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection; March 18-22, 2010; Atlanta, GA. Abstract 200.Google Scholar
7.Kowalski, W. UVGI deactivation theory. In: Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation Handbook. New York: Springer; 2009:17–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kowalski, W. Pulsed UV systems. In: Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation Handbook. New York: Springer; 2009:383–398.Google Scholar
9.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests: Approved Standards—10th Edition. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2009. CLSI document M02-A10.Google Scholar